ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Oct 18, 2023 1:41 pm
Man, how am I an example of the consequences of irresponsible reporting?
Cuz I tried for a “roll with it” floating the idea that maybe the nation that even mjl and DC don’t deny bombs hospitals, might suddenly NOT be the ones who bombed a hospital?
And what’s the evidence of Israel’s regard for civilian casualties? That the offer a warning before doing things like bomb hospitals?
(And residences. And UN schools. And pay no mind to all the civilians who say they never received any warning.)
Fish what’s your reaction to the ICC and UN stuff?
On this topic and on Ukraine, you do this thing where you kick up a cloud of dust as a way to avoid or obscure a very simple point.
Yesterday, you said this:
ousdahl wrote: ↑Tue Oct 17, 2023 1:43 pm
Man, all that “hospital damage was Hamas” seems once again pretty gaslighty. as if Israel is NOT indiscriminately bombing the fuck out of Gaza either way.
By describing the notion of Hamas' potential role in damaging the hospital as something that "seems once again pretty gaslighty," you (once again, if you like that phrase) adopt unsubstantiated talking points that are favorable to the aggressor's side of the conflict.
That's the same thing as what you do on Ukraine things, when people (correctly) point out that you routinely adopt pro-Putin talking points (for example, leaving room for at least
partial justification for Russia's aggression, because nazis or something).
And then today, you said this:
ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Oct 18, 2023 7:59 am
It’d be nice if journalists would do more actual journalism here, rather than taking these “well one (obviously biased) source says…” sorts of hot takes and running with it.
Can you not see that
you fell yesterday for the "sorts of hot takes" that today you are warning us against?
