Chiefs 2023
Re: Chiefs 2023
SaLArY CaPS dOnT wORk!!
Re: Chiefs 2023
No idea how to measure "most popular".
Smallest NFL markets:
1) Green Bay
2) Buffalo
3) New Orleans
4) Jacksonville
5) Las Vegas
6) Cincinnati
7) Kansas City
8) Baltimore
9) Pittsburgh
10) Nashville
11) Indianapolis
12) Charlotte
13) Cleveland
14) Miami
15) Denver
16) Minneapolis
17) Detroit
18) Seattle
19) Tampa
20) Phoenix
21) San Fran
22) DC
23) Boston
24) Atlanta
25) Houston
26) Dallas
27) Philly
28) Chicago
29/30) Los Angeles
31/32) New York
Smallest NFL markets:
1) Green Bay
2) Buffalo
3) New Orleans
4) Jacksonville
5) Las Vegas
6) Cincinnati
7) Kansas City
8) Baltimore
9) Pittsburgh
10) Nashville
11) Indianapolis
12) Charlotte
13) Cleveland
14) Miami
15) Denver
16) Minneapolis
17) Detroit
18) Seattle
19) Tampa
20) Phoenix
21) San Fran
22) DC
23) Boston
24) Atlanta
25) Houston
26) Dallas
27) Philly
28) Chicago
29/30) Los Angeles
31/32) New York
Re: Chiefs 2023
Dolphins-Chiefs Playoff Game on Peacock Sets Streaming Record With Average of 23 Million Viewers
Saturday night's AFC wild-card playoff game between the Miami Dolphins and Kansas City Chiefs on Peacock set a record for the most-watched event on a streaming service.
According to Nielsen, the Chiefs' 26-7 victory in frigid temperatures averaged 23 million viewers on Peacock, NFL+ and on NBC affiliates in Kansas City and Miami. Nielsen also reported Sunday night that the game had a total reach of 27.6 million.
Fans had to pay for a Peacock subscription, which starts at $5.99, to watch the game, making it the NFL's first playoff game behind a paywall — a move by the league that generated no shortage of complaints from fans.
Nonetheless, the average viewership easily surpassed the previous record of 15.3 million for the Nov. 30 matchup between the Seattle Seahawks and Dallas Cowboys on Amazon Prime Video. It also surpassed the audiences for the Saturday night wild-card playoff games that were shown on NBC in two of the last three years.
Last year’s first-round playoff game between the Los Angeles Chargers and Jacksonville Jaguars averaged 20.61 million viewers.
According to various reports, NBCUniversal paid $110 million for the rights to the game. Although the final score wasn't close, the Dolphins-Chiefs game had the novelty of being one of the coldest in NFL history — and Taylor Swift was in attendance to watch her boyfriend, Travis Kelce.
Judging by the audience, Saturday's game is unlikely to be the last playoff matchup shown on a streaming service.
Hans Schroeder, the NFL's executive vice president of media distribution, said viewership would be one factor in deciding if a wild card game would continue to be exclusively streamed in the future.
Under the NFL’s contract, each of its four broadcast partners — NBC, CBS, Fox and ESPN/ABC — gets at least one wild-card game. Of the two remaining games, one rotates each year between NBC, CBS and Fox, while the other will likely be up for bid each year. That means Peacock, Paramount+, Amazon or ESPN+ could eventually be in the running.
[...]
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Frank Wilhoit
Frank Wilhoit
Re: Chiefs 2023
I think the truth lies in between.
The limping Chargers and Jacksonville Jaguars of last year aren't nearly the draw as Mahomes, Kelce, Tua and Tyreek Hill...so we can can chug salt with that tidbit.
If you're getting 51 million for KC/Buffalo, you could assume you could break 30 for KC/Miami.
They didn't get that so certainly they lost a lot of eyeballs...but we also didn't do our jobs and knock that down to a 'oh shit' number.
I didn't pay for it. I did my part.
In the future I will continue to do so whether that is finding free trials or streaming it 'illegally'.
The limping Chargers and Jacksonville Jaguars of last year aren't nearly the draw as Mahomes, Kelce, Tua and Tyreek Hill...so we can can chug salt with that tidbit.
If you're getting 51 million for KC/Buffalo, you could assume you could break 30 for KC/Miami.
They didn't get that so certainly they lost a lot of eyeballs...but we also didn't do our jobs and knock that down to a 'oh shit' number.
I didn't pay for it. I did my part.
In the future I will continue to do so whether that is finding free trials or streaming it 'illegally'.
Re: Chiefs 2023
I gathered with a group of people who watched together at a home where they utilized the free Instacart+ trial and then cancelled the day after the game.pdub wrote: ↑Tue Jan 23, 2024 2:31 pm I think the truth lies in between.
The limping Chargers and Jacksonville Jaguars of last year aren't nearly the draw as Mahomes, Kelce, Tua and Tyreek Hill...so we can can chug salt with that tidbit.
If you're getting 51 million for KC/Buffalo, you could assume you could break 30 for KC/Miami.
They didn't get that so certainly they lost a lot of eyeballs...but we also didn't do our jobs and knock that down to a 'oh shit' number.
I didn't pay for it. I did my part.
In the future I will continue to do so whether that is finding free trials or streaming it 'illegally'.
I already pay for Amazon as they have enough content and benefits to be worth what I pay so games there don't cost me more.
I am not paying for Peacock. They have nothing else I want.
Re: Chiefs 2023
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Frank Wilhoit
Frank Wilhoit
Re: Chiefs 2023
The Chiefs were hugely popular in the 90s and have grown fan bases worldwide ever since. Jayhawks too.
Everyone loves a winna. Mr. Peaceful, Mr. Happy, that's what they long to be
Everyone loves a winna. Mr. Peaceful, Mr. Happy, that's what they long to be
Re: Chiefs 2023
Just a reminder, the Bills traded the 10th pick to the Chiefs in 2017. We picked Mahomes.
-
RainbowsandUnicorns
- Contributor
- Posts: 12501
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
Re: Chiefs 2023
That trade actually worked out pretty good for the Bills too. Player wise.
Gutter wrote: Fri Nov 8th 2:16pm
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
Re: Chiefs 2023
No doubt.
But it’s also largely been the reason for their failures in the postseason.
And now Allen’s contract balloons.
But it’s also largely been the reason for their failures in the postseason.
And now Allen’s contract balloons.
Re: Chiefs 2023
Allen is like Phil Rivers in that he can turn some freakish plays. But his legacy will be the same.
Re: Chiefs 2023
Thuney looking like a long shot to play.
Against Baltimore's defense? Ouch.
Against Baltimore's defense? Ouch.
Re: Chiefs 2023
tHeY woULdnT WoRk FOr BaSEBaLL fOr SOme REasoN!!!
Re: Chiefs 2023
Mostly just kIdDiNg.
I'm not gonna be the one to derail this thread anymore ( I was original derailer ) - not days before what could be another masterpiece from Mahomes.
If Skyy Moore and Kadarius Toney are both healthy enough to play, do we even bother?
I'm not gonna be the one to derail this thread anymore ( I was original derailer ) - not days before what could be another masterpiece from Mahomes.
If Skyy Moore and Kadarius Toney are both healthy enough to play, do we even bother?
Re: Chiefs 2023
(handshake)
Bother activating them? I'm afraid the answer is yes - wasn't it just last year we were a twisted ankle away from like running corners out there at WR in the AFC Championship?
Re: Chiefs 2023
It would be nice if we are going to be down Thuney, Gay, Edwards if Baltimore could oblige and be down Marlon Humphrey, starting CB, and Mark Andrews, a top 5 TE in the league when healthy.
-
DeletedUser
- Posts: 5049
- Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2023 11:35 pm