F the NCAA
Re: F the NCAA
Chamberlain clearly gambled that basketball might pay off. It was that or genetics. He and Genghis Khan might be related to half the planet in any event.
Re: F the NCAA
John Wooden was a good coach.jfish26 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 23, 2022 8:52 amIt seems fairly clear that, at no time anyone now alive was, well, alive...has college basketball been anything remotely close to financially or academically pure.KUTradition wrote: ↑Thu Dec 22, 2022 11:46 am
At Kansas, the Dipper's focus was not on the classroom. Discus thrower Al Oerter, winner of gold medals for four consecutive Olympics from 1956 to 1968, shared a business class with Chamberlain at KU. He always noticed when Chamberlain was there, which by Oerter's estimate was "one out of ten [classes]." Oerter looked up from his final examination and saw a small white student signing his name on the exam as "Wilt Chamberlain." Oerter whispered to the student, "Somehow you don't look like Wilt."..
And that people obsessed over retconning to the contrary...should really, really, really think about what interests, of third parties, are served by that obsession. More plainly: people who are NOT, themselves, motivated by very bad shit...are being used by people who are.
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Re: F the NCAA
it seems to me that what i'm saying and what you're saying aren't all that different. my main question/issue/whatever is why continue the charade - i.e. to your point, whose interests are being served by it? it started with NIL, so let's peel back the facade, make everything transparent, disentangle athletics from academics (which you just said has been a well-known farce for decades anyways), and revealed preferences will be made clear.jfish26 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 23, 2022 8:52 amIt seems fairly clear that, at no time anyone now alive was, well, alive...has college basketball been anything remotely close to financially or academically pure.KUTradition wrote: ↑Thu Dec 22, 2022 11:46 am
At Kansas, the Dipper's focus was not on the classroom. Discus thrower Al Oerter, winner of gold medals for four consecutive Olympics from 1956 to 1968, shared a business class with Chamberlain at KU. He always noticed when Chamberlain was there, which by Oerter's estimate was "one out of ten [classes]." Oerter looked up from his final examination and saw a small white student signing his name on the exam as "Wilt Chamberlain." Oerter whispered to the student, "Somehow you don't look like Wilt."..
And that people obsessed over retconning to the contrary...should really, really, really think about what interests, of third parties, are served by that obsession. More plainly: people who are NOT, themselves, motivated by very bad shit...are being used by people who are.
but clearly that wouldn't go well and ignorance is bliss so lets all keep our mouths shut and eyes closed...
Re: F the NCAA
I don’t have a problem at all with academics being part of the deal about playing college basketball. But it should make some goddamn sense; if academics are a check-the-box thing that don’t at all relate to why the kids are in school…then of course the programs and kids are going to find ways around it.hoopla wrote: ↑Sat Dec 24, 2022 7:36 amit seems to me that what i'm saying and what you're saying aren't all that different. my main question/issue/whatever is why continue the charade - i.e. to your point, whose interests are being served by it? it started with NIL, so let's peel back the facade, make everything transparent, disentangle athletics from academics (which you just said has been a well-known farce for decades anyways), and revealed preferences will be made clear.jfish26 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 23, 2022 8:52 amIt seems fairly clear that, at no time anyone now alive was, well, alive...has college basketball been anything remotely close to financially or academically pure.KUTradition wrote: ↑Thu Dec 22, 2022 11:46 am
At Kansas, the Dipper's focus was not on the classroom. Discus thrower Al Oerter, winner of gold medals for four consecutive Olympics from 1956 to 1968, shared a business class with Chamberlain at KU. He always noticed when Chamberlain was there, which by Oerter's estimate was "one out of ten [classes]." Oerter looked up from his final examination and saw a small white student signing his name on the exam as "Wilt Chamberlain." Oerter whispered to the student, "Somehow you don't look like Wilt."..
And that people obsessed over retconning to the contrary...should really, really, really think about what interests, of third parties, are served by that obsession. More plainly: people who are NOT, themselves, motivated by very bad shit...are being used by people who are.
but clearly that wouldn't go well and ignorance is bliss so lets all keep our mouths shut and eyes closed...
You could EASILY fill a four-year major with gen ed prereqs and an Athletics & Administration major, something like that, that makes a hell of a lot more sense than funneling athletes through nonsense academic paths.
Re: F the NCAA
It kinda seems like the moneyed brass, as much as anyone else, has some interest in NOT making the academic side of things too difficult for student ath-o-letes.
More time studying means less time practicing sports, which means a lesser product on the court, which means reduced fan interest, which means less lucrative media deals, and so on
More time studying means less time practicing sports, which means a lesser product on the court, which means reduced fan interest, which means less lucrative media deals, and so on
Re: F the NCAA
Things that generate big money always create these issues. If it was art or music that generated big money for the school similar things would be going on with those programs.
Re: F the NCAA
Music, in particular, is worse than athletics. Generally everything else is shunted aside by the best. And the best often come from families that can indulge high end instruments or lessons like golfers.
Re: F the NCAA
One of the bigger structural impediments to college athletics being more fair to the athletes who generate revenue…is that one of the first things on the chopping block would, logically, be need-blind scholarships for non-revenue sports.
Re: F the NCAA
Yes. KU B-ball has been supporting nearly the entirety of KU Athletics for years. NIL has allowed other entities to be legally involved in funding, so hopefully non-revenue sports won't have to be cut.jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 26, 2022 12:07 pmOne of the bigger structural impediments to college athletics being more fair to the athletes who generate revenue…is that one of the first things on the chopping block would, logically, be need-blind scholarships for non-revenue sports.
Re: F the NCAA
I think there are ways to chart a middle course on a lot of this stuff, but the latent issue with this is there are a lot of people in the donor class who…have become accustomed to little Jaxtylnn and Brinterly being able to get scholarships for non-revenue sports. One of the reasons change is so hard here.AlOerter wrote: ↑Mon Dec 26, 2022 1:13 pmYes. KU B-ball has been supporting nearly the entirety of KU Athletics for years. NIL has allowed other entities to be legally involved in funding, so hopefully non-revenue sports won't have to be cut.
Re: F the NCAA
Jaxtylnn and Brinterly?jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 26, 2022 1:38 pmI think there are ways to chart a middle course on a lot of this stuff, but the latent issue with this is there are a lot of people in the donor class who…have become accustomed to little Jaxtylnn and Brinterly being able to get scholarships for non-revenue sports. One of the reasons change is so hard here.
Re: F the NCAA
There's some strange one's on that list for sure but Jaxtlynn and Brinterly would be pretty close to the top of that one as well.jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 26, 2022 4:44 pm For example:
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-puck- ... 48319.html
Re: F the NCAA
It's where we're headed. If you have kids in youth sports right now...there are some WEIRD names out there.
A few real ones on my own kids' teams:
Garrick
Caden
Palmer
Draden
Teague
Bodhe
Gentry
Jaxton
A few real ones on my own kids' teams:
Garrick
Caden
Palmer
Draden
Teague
Bodhe
Gentry
Jaxton
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13911
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: F the NCAA
i can understand wanting to be unique, but if it’s pronounced the same way why make it difficult with crazy spellings?
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
Re: F the NCAA
Call me Isthis'ell.
Re: F the NCAA
Pretty much. I like to think of it, in Spanish-speaking-soccer-announcer-voice, like, "Jaden passes to Braden, who passes to Kaden! And now KADEN finds JAYDEN, who sends it ahead to...DRADEN!!! And on to BRAYDEN, for the GOOOOOAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
Re: F the NCAA
Jepson, Keyfob and Breitling walk into a juice bar. . . .
Re: F the NCAA
Yea but that’s still way too exciting to be soccer.jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 27, 2022 12:22 pmPretty much. I like to think of it, in Spanish-speaking-soccer-announcer-voice, like, "Jaden passes to Braden, who passes to Kaden! And now KADEN finds JAYDEN, who sends it ahead to...DRADEN!!! And on to BRAYDEN, for the GOOOOOAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
It’s more like, “Brayden passes to Draden! Back to Brayden! Brayden holds it! Holds it!!! HOLDS ITTTTTT!!!!!!!”