F the NCAA
-
- Posts: 5032
- Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2023 11:35 pm
Re: F the NCAA
Fwiw, I wasn't trying to be rude or combative.
Re: F the NCAA
I know you weren't, my frustration with this subject shows up in text as aggressively towards the posters in response. It's not meant that way, it's aggressive in my dislike of the entire decline of the game I've loved for 40+ years.
Just Ledoux it
Re: F the NCAA
when do we get our Final Four banner back too?
https://www.espn.com/college-football/s ... y-returned
https://www.espn.com/college-football/s ... y-returned
Re: F the NCAA
I’m sure soon but not long after we won’t be in the NCAA anymore and then our kids kids will laugh at those titles like we laugh at Helms.ousdahl wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 4:55 am when do we get our Final Four banner back too?
https://www.espn.com/college-football/s ... y-returned
Re: F the NCAA
I dunno bro…the thing about the ncaa banners is, they were actual games we won
Re: F the NCAA
What about all the CFB seasons 1990s and before?
Re: F the NCAA
Did Silvio de Sousa play in them?
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13879
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: F the NCAA
football-related, but i think it belongs here
Big 12, and likely ACC, football programs are beginning to see a new dirty trick being played on the recruiting trail. Recruits are now saying that some coaches from the Big Ten and SEC are telling recruits that Big 12 schools soon won't be playing college football at the highest level. In reality, no one knows if a super division will be created, what schools will be included, and how long before the settling of law suits even clears the path for this new semi-pro division of college football...
(247)
Big 12, and likely ACC, football programs are beginning to see a new dirty trick being played on the recruiting trail. Recruits are now saying that some coaches from the Big Ten and SEC are telling recruits that Big 12 schools soon won't be playing college football at the highest level. In reality, no one knows if a super division will be created, what schools will be included, and how long before the settling of law suits even clears the path for this new semi-pro division of college football...
(247)
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
-
- Posts: 5032
- Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2023 11:35 pm
Re: F the NCAA
KU will be fine either way. The SEC wants KU.
Re: F the NCAA
I mean, no objections from me. But at some point the SEC and the Big Ten are going to align and rebrand (and if it's not made explicit when that happens, rest assured that the point will be to kill off the NCAA as regarding D-I football and basketball).
Re: F the NCAA
“ But at some point the SEC and the Big Ten are going to align and rebrand”
It’s gonna RULE!!!
It’s gonna RULE!!!
Re: F the NCAA
This should be interesting, the "beginning of the end" of the NCAA as we have discussed ad nauseum on these boards for the major conferences. A whole new movement of realignment and consolidation?
A long read, but worthwhile for opening a whole new round of shit...
"Looking ahead to this week's House v. NCAA settlement votes"
https://www.espn.com/college-sports/sto ... ment-votes
A long read, but worthwhile for opening a whole new round of shit...
"Looking ahead to this week's House v. NCAA settlement votes"
https://www.espn.com/college-sports/sto ... ment-votes
Re: F the NCAA
"The power conferences would agree to a forward-looking revenue-sharing structure that would give schools the ability to spend a maximum of roughly $20 million per year on direct payments to athletes. The $20 million figure could grow larger every few years if school revenue grows"