That's true, but measures as great in scale as those that are and will be imposed are not about ensuring there is ZERO spread; that's impossible. They're about slowing spread - flattening the curve, as they say.Grandma wrote: ↑Wed Mar 11, 2020 12:48 pmI agree it's different but how do you control the "environments" in terms of holding NCAA Tournament games? You are talking travel exposure, lodging exposure, food exposure, venue exposure, and is every single player and coach going to be tested before and during the tournament on a daily basis? What about those they come in contact with? ZERO way to completely "control" all the environments they will/would be exposed to.NewtonHawk11 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 11, 2020 12:41 pmA mass of classes and dorms are A LOT different than a team of 15 guys, 10 coaches/staff and essential arena personnel.
I get why colleges are sending kids home. There's a mass of humanity everywhere at universities, a basketball team in multiple controlled environments is different.
In that light, it is hard to imagine the NCAA voluntarily canceling (since that would, I presume, threaten the TV revenue). Would state and local governments do it for them?
Indications are no, at least as of yet; restrictions on public events with 1,000 people would be easy to meet. Even 250 seems plausible, and that's the most restrictive one yet in the US.