oh i know...wasn’t trying to call you out or anythingGqcolorado wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2020 6:27 pmagree. the (,right,) was suppose to indicate what your reply said.TraditionKU wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2020 5:31 pmthe bolded is utter bsGqcolorado wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2020 5:14 pm Probably no one doubts that China has suppressed numbers. Had they reported correctly, our government would have better prepared for the inevitable spread to the US, right, because our experts only respond to the actual numbers China reports.
Fuck that deflection nonsense.
“we” got caught with our pants down, period
we were never going to be prepared, and still aren’t even though the reality is right in front of us
COVID-19 numbers
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Re: COVID-19 numbers
lulz @v geezer still running interference for the CCP.
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Re: COVID-19 numbers
i think it’s fair bet that the chinese haven't been entirely transparent...their not allowing international experts in originally is proof enough for me
presuming that, had they been transparent, the US response would’ve been substantially different is a whole other story
presuming that, had they been transparent, the US response would’ve been substantially different is a whole other story
Re: COVID-19 numbers
They were far worse than not transparent. They actively and purposefully hid data, arrested whistleblowers, manipulated the WHO, and falsified information about the virus -- and that's just the stuff that can be proven with no effort at all.TraditionKU wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2020 6:36 pm i think it’s fair bet that the chinese haven't been entirely transparent...their not allowing international experts in originally is proof enough for me
presuming that, had they been transparent, the US response would’ve been substantially different is a whole other story
And yes, that is a separate and distinct question from whether or not we were properly prepared or took the early warnings seriously.
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Re: COVID-19 numbers
268 reported deaths yesterday in US. If Ms. Owen's numbers are correct, then that means that 3.6% of deaths in America are due to COVID-19.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Not surprised:
“The Electoral College is DEI for rural white folks.”
Derek Cressman
Derek Cressman
Re: COVID-19 numbers
So kinda how we are artificially keeping numbers down by refusing to test people who have been sick or have died?DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2020 6:48 pmThey were far worse than not transparent. They actively and purposefully hid data, arrested whistleblowers, manipulated the WHO, and falsified information about the virus -- and that's just the stuff that can be proven with no effort at all.TraditionKU wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2020 6:36 pm i think it’s fair bet that the chinese haven't been entirely transparent...their not allowing international experts in originally is proof enough for me
presuming that, had they been transparent, the US response would’ve been substantially different is a whole other story
And yes, that is a separate and distinct question from whether or not we were properly prepared or took the early warnings seriously.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
As long as you all (all of us) are arguing the semantics from home, It’s about all the average schmuck can do, so keep on keepin on.twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Mar 27, 2020 10:57 amSo kinda how we are artificially keeping numbers down by refusing to test people who have been sick or have died?DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2020 6:48 pmThey were far worse than not transparent. They actively and purposefully hid data, arrested whistleblowers, manipulated the WHO, and falsified information about the virus -- and that's just the stuff that can be proven with no effort at all.TraditionKU wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2020 6:36 pm i think it’s fair bet that the chinese haven't been entirely transparent...their not allowing international experts in originally is proof enough for me
presuming that, had they been transparent, the US response would’ve been substantially different is a whole other story
And yes, that is a separate and distinct question from whether or not we were properly prepared or took the early warnings seriously.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
What her numbers really mean are,
A. We don't take the threat of infectious diseases seriously enough prior to this
B. We've been really lucky in the past with things like H1N1
Every time I hear someone try to downplay it by comparing it to the flu, I'm like, yeah, the flu is really fucking bad, it kills half a million people every year, and that's in years when the vaccine is really good. This is significantly worse and there's no vaccine and no treatement.
I only came to kick some ass...
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Fun fact, I got H1N1 at KU. My classmate was like person #3 to be diagnosed at KU for it (there were hundreds), and we were in the middle of a massive project together before and after she was diagnosed.
That one hit me hard.
That one hit me hard.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Yep, havent left the house for anything other than a walk around the block in a days now. One trip to Target and one trip to the grocery store are the only times I have been in a car in a week.Gqcolorado wrote: ↑Fri Mar 27, 2020 11:12 amAs long as you all (all of us) are arguing the semantics from home, It’s about all the average schmuck can do, so keep on keepin on.twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Mar 27, 2020 10:57 amSo kinda how we are artificially keeping numbers down by refusing to test people who have been sick or have died?DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2020 6:48 pm
They were far worse than not transparent. They actively and purposefully hid data, arrested whistleblowers, manipulated the WHO, and falsified information about the virus -- and that's just the stuff that can be proven with no effort at all.
And yes, that is a separate and distinct question from whether or not we were properly prepared or took the early warnings seriously.
As bug as the official numbers are, it does make me wonder what the real numbers are.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
The good news, as it were, is that if you've pretty aggressively shut things down for a week or more, you're past the point where you'd expect to show symptoms. Of course there are exceptions (and those tend to be publicized!), but the math is in your favor.twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Mar 27, 2020 2:40 pmYep, havent left the house for anything other than a walk around the block in a days now. One trip to Target and one trip to the grocery store are the only times I have been in a car in a week.Gqcolorado wrote: ↑Fri Mar 27, 2020 11:12 amAs long as you all (all of us) are arguing the semantics from home, It’s about all the average schmuck can do, so keep on keepin on.
As bug as the official numbers are, it does make me wonder what the real numbers are.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
My guess is less than 30% the people who will get it haven't gotten it yet. I sure hope I'm wrong.jfish26 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 27, 2020 4:03 pmThe good news, as it were, is that if you've pretty aggressively shut things down for a week or more, you're past the point where you'd expect to show symptoms. Of course there are exceptions (and those tend to be publicized!), but the math is in your favor.twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Mar 27, 2020 2:40 pmYep, havent left the house for anything other than a walk around the block in a days now. One trip to Target and one trip to the grocery store are the only times I have been in a car in a week.Gqcolorado wrote: ↑Fri Mar 27, 2020 11:12 am
As long as you all (all of us) are arguing the semantics from home, It’s about all the average schmuck can do, so keep on keepin on.
As bug as the official numbers are, it does make me wonder what the real numbers are.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
That's actually a very optimistic number.Grandma wrote: ↑Fri Mar 27, 2020 4:48 pmMy guess is less than 30% the people who will get it haven't gotten it yet. I sure hope I'm wrong.jfish26 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 27, 2020 4:03 pmThe good news, as it were, is that if you've pretty aggressively shut things down for a week or more, you're past the point where you'd expect to show symptoms. Of course there are exceptions (and those tend to be publicized!), but the math is in your favor.twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Mar 27, 2020 2:40 pm
Yep, havent left the house for anything other than a walk around the block in a days now. One trip to Target and one trip to the grocery store are the only times I have been in a car in a week.
As bug as the official numbers are, it does make me wonder what the real numbers are.
I only came to kick some ass...
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
But the clock re-sets every time you have to run to the grocery store, or any other trip out.jfish26 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 27, 2020 4:03 pmThe good news, as it were, is that if you've pretty aggressively shut things down for a week or more, you're past the point where you'd expect to show symptoms. Of course there are exceptions (and those tend to be publicized!), but the math is in your favor.twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Mar 27, 2020 2:40 pmYep, havent left the house for anything other than a walk around the block in a days now. One trip to Target and one trip to the grocery store are the only times I have been in a car in a week.Gqcolorado wrote: ↑Fri Mar 27, 2020 11:12 am
As long as you all (all of us) are arguing the semantics from home, It’s about all the average schmuck can do, so keep on keepin on.
As bug as the official numbers are, it does make me wonder what the real numbers are.
I only came to kick some ass...
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
^^^^^
And that is the creepiest thing about this virus.
And that is the creepiest thing about this virus.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
The clock resets, yes, but the likelihood is significantly less than when you were just going about your days as normal.PhDhawk wrote: ↑Fri Mar 27, 2020 4:52 pmBut the clock re-sets every time you have to run to the grocery store, or any other trip out.jfish26 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 27, 2020 4:03 pmThe good news, as it were, is that if you've pretty aggressively shut things down for a week or more, you're past the point where you'd expect to show symptoms. Of course there are exceptions (and those tend to be publicized!), but the math is in your favor.twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Mar 27, 2020 2:40 pm
Yep, havent left the house for anything other than a walk around the block in a days now. One trip to Target and one trip to the grocery store are the only times I have been in a car in a week.
As bug as the official numbers are, it does make me wonder what the real numbers are.