This should start ~ 25 seconds before she makes reference to the $50 test not being economical.jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Apr 17, 2020 12:24 pmDepends on who in the administration/cabinet/donor list is and what their ROI needs to be.PhDhawk wrote: ↑Fri Apr 17, 2020 12:17 pmI heard her say that. She said at $50 a test it wasn't economical, but at $100 a test it was, because that was what was needed to pay the technicians.jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Apr 17, 2020 11:18 am
If only the Stimulus packages in some way could help.
There's something completely fucked up about those numbers if the testing is at all fast or high-throughput.
Now, finding and hiring enough qualified people to administer the tests, I could believe that to be a bottle-neck. But the numbers she quoted seem like complete nonsense to me.
If it doesn't, fwd to ~ 1:07:40 mark.