DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Sat May 02, 2020 4:43 pm
Meanwhile, back at YOUR base:
An asshole Democrat? Really? OMG! Who knew they existed?
EEEK? lolz? oUtrAge?
I think you were probably addressing Geezer and not me by saying "YOUR base". If I was included in that - Just to reiterate, I'm the guy who doesn't just think there are assholes in both the Republican and Democratic parties, I know there are.
You’ve been one of my most loyal supporters in Making America Great Again and because of you - we’re winning!
But to keep winning, we have to Make Michigan RED Again and keep the Senate Majority out of Democrats hands. That’s why I’m emailing you today.
With election day coming up, the DC Democratic money machine - and their liberal puppet Gary Peters - sees Michigan as their best shot to stop US. They’re pouring millions into this race to defeat John James and WE HAVE TO FIGHT BACK.
(MY NAME) will you join me fighting back and supporting a great patriot like John?
>> Help John $10 <<
>> Help John $25 <<
>> Help John $50 <<
>> Help John $100 <<
>> Help John $250 <<
The Do nothing Democrat, Gary Peters, already has $8 million on hand to defeat John James and Cryin’ Chuck Schumer has already started pouring in MILLIONS more. That’s why I’m emailing you, personally, to ask for your support of John.
>> I’M WITH JOHN <<
John is West Point graduate, served 8 years in uniform in service to our country, including flying missions over Baghdad during Operation Iraqi Freedom, and then came home to serve his community as a small business owner - and we NEED John in the Senate.
Our nation’s future is resting in the balance of what happens in Michigan this year. If the Democrats can win this race and grab control of the Senate - it will fuel their efforts to undo all the progress that our conservative movement has made in the last three years.
Friend, I wouldn’t be emailing you if this race wasn’t important. I told John I would check in with him later today to see if YOU have stepped up.
We need just 132 great American patriots to give
in the next 6 hours to help save our Senate Majority.
>> I’M WITH JOHN <<
I’m counting on your help to save our Senate Majority.
Its fun to watch some twist and turn to allow Bidens transgressions to be ok while blasting trumps same issues for 3.5 years as completely and totally unacceptable (they are unacceptable. But that goes for both of them).
How, after all the anger of the past4 years, is Joe Biden the horse you want to ride in on?
TDub wrote: ↑Sun May 03, 2020 3:14 pm
Its fun to watch some twist and turn to allow Bidens transgressions to be ok while blasting trumps same issues for 3.5 years as completely and totally unacceptable (they are unacceptable. But that goes for both of them).
How, after all the anger of the past4 years, is Joe Biden the horse you want to ride in on?
Geezer wrote: ↑Wed Sep 19, 2018 9:11 pm
Need the truth, anyone?
So says you.
Perhaps it is "ridiculous". Perhaps it's not "ridiculous".
Do you feel it's "ridiculous" that a man who is being nominated for the highest court in the land is now being accused of inappropriate sexual behavior by another woman?
Or do you feel, "ridiculous" is a women making false allegations? - Assuming they are false.
Maybe "ridiculous" is people refusing to believe a woman or absolutely believing a woman who is telling a true or a false story - because they don't like or they do like that she is accusing someone they choose to feel is innocent or guilty. - ASSUMING the allegations are true or false.
seahawk wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:21 am
Seems like there's another allegation surfacing. Perhaps we could remember that this is not a trial, but a job interview. One which seems to be revealing that the would be employee is a high functioning alcoholic who has a gambling problem and some past unpleasant behavior with women.
ousdahl wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 9:56 pm
Kavanaugh doesn't even have the job yet.
how often can a candidate be interviewed, the employer calls the references, allegations of sex assault come up and the employer reacts, meh just conjecture and questionable memories
ousdahl wrote: ↑Tue Sep 25, 2018 9:26 am
Could you imagine how OuTrAgEd psych would be if libtards were trying to ram through a scotus judge instead of investigating credible allegations of assault?
ousdahl wrote: ↑Tue Sep 25, 2018 9:42 am
This dude could be a violent sexual predator convicted how many times over, but so long as he was also a “conservative constitutionalist” who made psych feel like he’s on the side that’s “winning,” he would still want him confirmed ASAP
seahawk wrote: ↑Tue Sep 25, 2018 12:09 pm
One of my least favorite news person talking heads is Chuck Todd. But, he stated the simplest and probably most true thing about sexual assault and all kinds of behavior that usually isn't talked about in public last week, saying, "You really don't know anyone, you really can't say what goes on with them."
DrPepper wrote: ↑Tue Sep 25, 2018 3:24 pm
If you don't think that Dr. Ford's memories from high school should carry any weight, then you haven't been paying any attention to the MeToo movement.
In my book, it is a completely plausible story.
I'm 49 years old, so similar to Dr. Ford in age.
* Stuff from several decades ago comes up in a recent therapy session? Yep. Check. MeToo!
* Been sexually assaulted in college and never told anyone about it? Yep. Check. MeToo! (well, until just now)
For people to so brazenly pronounce Dr. Ford's claims as categorically impossible is shocking to me. If you missed the lesson during the heyday of the MeToo movement, open your eyes.
Sexual assault is not ok (even if people are drunk; even if people are teens). If any of you were in college right now, you would know this from the mandatory training.
Lawyers and Judges are held to a higher bar than anyone else.
