Fox and Friends

[Deleted User 318]

Not Nice.

[Deleted User 289]

Exposed for being the __________ that she is?

[Shirley]

[quote=Grandma post_id=120912 time=1591281139 user_id=289]
Exposed for being the __________ that she is?

-----------------

I wish democrats hadn't caused our fellow Americans to fall for crap like that.

[japhy]

https://mashable.com/article/fox-news-f ... thon-joke/

When you are desperate to paint a movement as radical, any source will do.

[Deleted User 289]

Is Hannity eating his words tonight or his he too busy sucking Trump's dick?

[Deleted User 289]

Tucker vs. Tammy. It's one thing and fine not to agree with her. It's another to become a complete asshole in regards to what you say about her.
Is he really that big of a piece of shit that he has no remorse in saying what he's said about her?
Let's see if Fox shows any morals and makes a statement regarding him. I predict they do.

[ousdahl]

I almost bumped this the other day when Fox News aired a photo of Epstein and Maxwell and “mistakenly” cropped out Trump

[Geezer]

Tucker is that big an asshole. Just another run of the mill conservative.

[seahawk]

When did Republicans become against the military?

[twocoach]

When did Republicans become against the military?

When the mitary became against Trump.

[sdoyel]

Oh?

[ousdahl]

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tucker-car ... -backlash/

Tucker Carlson draws backlash after saying 17-year-old Kenosha shooting suspect "maintain[ed] order when no one else would"

[sdoyel]

He’s the biggest shit bag on television.

[jhawks99]

2nd biggest.

[Deleted User 89]

https://theatlantic.com/culture/archive ... ax/616309/

[ousdahl]

You Literally Can't Believe The Facts Tucker Carlson Tells You. So Say Fox's Lawyers

https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/91774712 ... ox-s-lawye

Just read U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil's opinion, leaning heavily on the arguments of Fox's lawyers: The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "

She wrote: "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."

Vyskocil, an appointee of President Trump's, added, "Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as 'exaggeration,' 'non-literal commentary,' or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same — the statements are not actionable."

[Deleted User 310]

You Literally Can't Believe The Facts Tucker Carlson Tells You. So Say Fox's Lawyers

https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/91774712 ... ox-s-lawye

Just read U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil's opinion, leaning heavily on the arguments of Fox's lawyers: The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "

She wrote: "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."

Vyskocil, an appointee of President Trump's, added, "Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as 'exaggeration,' 'non-literal commentary,' or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same — the statements are not actionable."

It is entertainment television.

[ousdahl]

do Fox News viewers know that?

[Deleted User 310]

do Fox News viewers know that?

Many probably don't.

CNN isn't much better...and I watch a lot of CNN.

[ousdahl]

death, taxes, and illy bothsidesing.