Redskins
Re: Redskins
Yea, it sucks, it's the opposite of LolzDC.
- NewtonHawk11
- Posts: 12826
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:48 am
- Location: Kansas
Re: Redskins
Name is officially done. New name not released yet due to pending trademarks.
“I don’t remember anything he said, but it was a very memorable speech.” Julian Wright on a speech Michael Jordan gave to a group he was in
"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
- NewtonHawk11
- Posts: 12826
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:48 am
- Location: Kansas
Re: Redskins
Why the trademark issues..?
“I don’t remember anything he said, but it was a very memorable speech.” Julian Wright on a speech Michael Jordan gave to a group he was in
"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
Re: Redskins
Would seem to suggest Warriors is the desired play.
Re: Redskins
I saw a suggestion that, when this bill comes due for "Chiefs," that, among other things, "Pioneers" and "Cavalry" should be considered.
Those are...um...hilariously and specifically not the idea here.
Those are...um...hilariously and specifically not the idea here.
Re: Redskins
Chiefs should change to Kings if forced to change.
Or, just be the first team to drop the dopey ‘mascots’ and go with Kansas City.
Or, just be the first team to drop the dopey ‘mascots’ and go with Kansas City.
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: Redskins
Chiefs will follow the Braves's lead, which seems sensible. Keep the innocuous nickname, but get rid of the caricature encouraging.
Re: Redskins
Warriors is kinda lame, cuz there’s already a pro team by the same name. Sure there’s already other pro teams that share names, and lord knows too many tigers and eagles and wildcats at the college level, but you get to pick a whole new name. Pick something new.
I kinda like cascadia’s suggestion, even though the wizards kinda did it already.
But I also like the mascots being the “Mascots.” Kinda undermines the whole thing.
I kinda like cascadia’s suggestion, even though the wizards kinda did it already.
But I also like the mascots being the “Mascots.” Kinda undermines the whole thing.
Re: Redskins
We shouldn’t be telling KC fans how to root for their beloved.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:01 am Chiefs will follow the Braves's lead, which seems sensible. Keep the innocuous nickname, but get rid of the caricature encouraging.
Re: Redskins
I tend to agree.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:01 am Chiefs will follow the Braves's lead, which seems sensible. Keep the innocuous nickname, but get rid of the caricature encouraging.
I also think one of the Washington possibilities - Redtails - just puts them on the same level as Chiefs and Braves and Seminoles and Blackhawks.
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: Redskins
I thought Redtails was a nod to a US military outfit?
A little perspective I saw on twitter this morning: I guess the Chiefs used to have a mascot that was someone dressed in full "Native American" garb with headdress, paint, etc. That was replaced with KC Wolf, who is now beloved amongst Chiefs fans. At the time, there was backlash for the replacement--same kind of "PC" arguments. Vast majority of the fans just want football.
A little perspective I saw on twitter this morning: I guess the Chiefs used to have a mascot that was someone dressed in full "Native American" garb with headdress, paint, etc. That was replaced with KC Wolf, who is now beloved amongst Chiefs fans. At the time, there was backlash for the replacement--same kind of "PC" arguments. Vast majority of the fans just want football.
Re: Redskins
Some dude filed a ton of trademarks to squat on potential name changes in like 2014. Word is they are negotiating with him on the rights, or at the very least, consulting with the Washington Football Club's lawyers to make sure no infringement.
Re: Redskins
It was an all-black fighter group from WW2. They made a movie about it. I could see there being trademark issues with the name.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:33 am I thought Redtails was a nod to a US military outfit?
A little perspective I saw on twitter this morning: I guess the Chiefs used to have a mascot that was someone dressed in full "Native American" garb with headdress, paint, etc. That was replaced with KC Wolf, who is now beloved amongst Chiefs fans. At the time, there was backlash for the replacement--same kind of "PC" arguments. Vast majority of the fans just want football.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_Airmen
Re: Redskins
Right - the name would be a nod to a group that was its own group only because of segregation. It seems to me that that's not so far removed from the issue here.NiceDC wrote: ↑Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:37 amIt was an all-black fighter group from WW2. They made a movie about it. I could see there being trademark issues with the name.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:33 am I thought Redtails was a nod to a US military outfit?
A little perspective I saw on twitter this morning: I guess the Chiefs used to have a mascot that was someone dressed in full "Native American" garb with headdress, paint, etc. That was replaced with KC Wolf, who is now beloved amongst Chiefs fans. At the time, there was backlash for the replacement--same kind of "PC" arguments. Vast majority of the fans just want football.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_Airmen
- holidaysmore
- Posts: 3186
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2018 11:18 am
Re: Redskins
If they want to honor Native Peoples and the military they should be the Washington Code Talkers.
Holidaysmore - 2005
Re: Redskins
CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:33 am I thought Redtails was a nod to a US military outfit?
A little perspective I saw on twitter this morning: I guess the Chiefs used to have a mascot that was someone dressed in full "Native American" garb with headdress, paint, etc. That was replaced with KC Wolf, who is now beloved amongst Chiefs fans. At the time, there was backlash for the replacement--same kind of "PC" arguments. Vast majority of the fans just want football.
That’s the problem with using sports as any type of platform for outrage. We go to sports to avoid such things, generally speaking. So, sure, use the spotlight to get your issues noticed, but don’t linger, or the escapism is compromised.
Problem this time is a lot of this is echoed in the employee/ownership/leadership hierarchy of the leagues. Will be curious if real inroads are made.
Re: Redskins
It's so sad how we let a small minority of people decide that racism is in everything. If they must find a new name, Washington Warriors is probably the best way to go.
"This whole thing was a big dick-waving contest, it's just that my dick was bigger than yours."