In this thread, the "experts" own Lobs

[chiknbut]

But it's safe to assume that anyone who denies a black person for any reason, is racist? That's the inconsistency problem. It's not racist to turn down a Jew or Asian, but it is racist anytime in involves blacks.

Is this rambling mess in regards to some specific event or just a general collection of words? What are you talking about?

I believe it is poor attempt at making an argument by making an appeal to the extremes. Which is a logical fallacy. Then did a really effective job of making himself look like an asshole by punctuating it with an emoji.

I feel it's my duty to point out to you that this is no way to "earn" a response from Lobby/Walrus.

[Walrus]

Good stuff.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7S_Xl2eOeeY

[Deleted User 289]

I'm wondering if Lobster realizes the Governor of Maryland is a Republican and if Lobster feels he (the Governor) bears any responsibility for the plight of Baltimore.
I'm also wondering if Lobster realizes how contradictory his sharing the video is in terms of his claim of "systemic racism" not existing.

[ousdahl]

if you're really wondering if Lobster realizes, keep wondering.

[PhDhawk]

"If you're wondering if I want you to, I want you to"

-Rivers Cuomo

[ousdahl]

I loved that guy in the Verizon commercials.

[PhDhawk]

he was great in stand by me.

[Deleted User 310]

https://youtu.be/o7A-MLVEeMA

[Walrus]

Haha, more good stuff! That guy has a good channel.

[twocoach]

So dumb.

[Deleted User 310]

So dumb.

It is dumb...but it is also pretty accurate for a lot of people from both sides.

[twocoach]

So dumb.

It is dumb...but it is also pretty accurate for a lot of people from both sides.

No, it's a tired generalization that occurs in some instances. I watch people here over and over take the stupid ass information that Lobster shares, go out and research it and then provide the results of that research.

[TDub]

It occurs here daily.

[Walrus]

"In Defense of Looting"

Today's batshit crazy article from NPR...

https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch ... of-looting

[Deleted User 89]

how silly

the npr writer/s interviewed the author of a book, which they point out as being controversial and provocative, that just happened to come out in the midst of social unrest

why is that batshit crazy?

you could argue that the author of the book, which i’m sure you haven’t read, is batshit crazy...or that the premise that looting is defensible is batshit crazy, but why is interviewing the author batshit crazy?

honest question, if you’d care to answer

[ousdahl]

well he didn't even bother to mention the actual headline starts with, "One author's controversial view..."

[Walrus]

A very famous podcaster yesterday said "Why go pay for this book? Just go out and loot it."

[Deleted User 89]

thanks for answering my question

you really do have reading issues, don’t you?

[Walrus]

You have to earn my time.

Look at how Illy or Jfish communicate if you need examples...

[Deleted User 89]

you aren’t worth it anymore

i tried in the past

you aren’t interested in legitimate conversation/discussion as evidenced by your continued ignorance about systemic racism. a number of us genuinely interacted with you on the topic, providing both examples and definitions. they didn’t fit your narrative, so you dismissed them and continue to do childish things like posting systemic racism in quotes...similar to 911 conspiracy bs. same story, different day

you link to 4chan for christ’s sake

it’s incredibly transparent, but whatever. hope you made a “killing” with the masks you horded