Chefs
Re: Chefs
The O-line wasn't spotless, but Mahomes is best when breaks contain. He stood around listlessly much of the day. The late 8-point rally was too little, too late, but showed the flashes that should have been there all day. You can always sense when the refs are on something of a revisionist tear with the Chiefs. They made some dubious calls that impacted the game. They called a PI to keep a Raider drive going and passed on two pretty blatant calls that would have helped KC. The team was down like it had been against the Chargers and needed the calls yesterday. Could have had 18-more First Half points on a hot day. But no excuse to just piss down the leg on defense. That was embarrassing.
Re: Chefs
This^^^holidaysmore wrote: ↑Sun Oct 11, 2020 3:48 pm Both sides of the ball upfront got whipped. Zero pressure on Carr and Mahomes never looked comfortable. The word is out. Rush three or four, which you can still get pressure especially in his face and then drop seven or eight.
Chiefs haven't looked sharp since the Ravens game and something like this was just a matter of time.
Re: Chefs
I think this shitty loss will end up costing us the bye.
“Las Vegas blitzed only three times, or on 6% of Mahomes' dropbacks (Mahomes went 3-for-3 for 85 yards on those plays). That's the second-lowest blitz rate he has faced in his career. Still, the Raiders got pressure on Mahomes 28 times in 48 dropbacks (57%) -- the second-highest pressure rate of Mahomes' career.”
“Las Vegas blitzed only three times, or on 6% of Mahomes' dropbacks (Mahomes went 3-for-3 for 85 yards on those plays). That's the second-lowest blitz rate he has faced in his career. Still, the Raiders got pressure on Mahomes 28 times in 48 dropbacks (57%) -- the second-highest pressure rate of Mahomes' career.”
- holidaysmore
- Posts: 3186
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2018 11:18 am
Re: Chefs
Remember last year when the Chiefs dropped consecutive home losses to the Colts and Texans. We all thought the house was falling down. What we learned last year was that a season is a marathon and not a sprint and most importantly that the core make up of this team thrives in adversity.
We were led to believe that this Chiefs team was the 97, 72-10 Bulls when in reality they probably aren't. Like you pointed out they have some glaring issues and most of the time the team, and really 15 is good enough to hide them. Nothing that happened against the Raiders was a new thing. Winning in the NFL is a hard thing to do and us as fans have been spoiled by success ever since 15 became the starter. I trust they will address the errors and my belief is that as long as 15 is upright then the Chiefs have a chance against anyone.
We were led to believe that this Chiefs team was the 97, 72-10 Bulls when in reality they probably aren't. Like you pointed out they have some glaring issues and most of the time the team, and really 15 is good enough to hide them. Nothing that happened against the Raiders was a new thing. Winning in the NFL is a hard thing to do and us as fans have been spoiled by success ever since 15 became the starter. I trust they will address the errors and my belief is that as long as 15 is upright then the Chiefs have a chance against anyone.
Holidaysmore - 2005
Re: Chefs
Not all losses are created equal.pdub wrote: ↑Tue Oct 13, 2020 6:52 am I think this shitty loss will end up costing us the bye.
“Las Vegas blitzed only three times, or on 6% of Mahomes' dropbacks (Mahomes went 3-for-3 for 85 yards on those plays). That's the second-lowest blitz rate he has faced in his career. Still, the Raiders got pressure on Mahomes 28 times in 48 dropbacks (57%) -- the second-highest pressure rate of Mahomes' career.”
If you would have told me the Chiefs would be 4-1 right now, I would have guessed the 1 was at Baltimore.
And in that scenario, the loss would mean the Chiefs needed help.
As things stand, they do not.
- NewtonHawk11
- Posts: 12826
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:48 am
- Location: Kansas
Re: Chefs
Someone talk me out of taking Chiefs -5.5
I think they smoke Buffalo today.
I think they smoke Buffalo today.
“I don’t remember anything he said, but it was a very memorable speech.” Julian Wright on a speech Michael Jordan gave to a group he was in
"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
- NewtonHawk11
- Posts: 12826
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:48 am
- Location: Kansas
Re: Chefs
I think Chiefs win something like 35-24 or something along those lines.
Here's the thing, I think they do have the defense for that. Just had a bad game. But other than that, they owned Baltimore, kept Watson in check, and has done pretty good for most part. 22 ppg allowed on defense. That'll do it.
Here's the thing, I think they do have the defense for that. Just had a bad game. But other than that, they owned Baltimore, kept Watson in check, and has done pretty good for most part. 22 ppg allowed on defense. That'll do it.
“I don’t remember anything he said, but it was a very memorable speech.” Julian Wright on a speech Michael Jordan gave to a group he was in
"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG