who ya got?
Re: who ya got?
(You’ve fallen right into the trap.)
Re: who ya got?
I haven't fallen into any trap. I have already voted for Biden and would do so regardless.
I simply asked if they have been confirmed as real by someone in the emails... surely one of those always reliable "anonymous sources".
Even the Washington Post has an article out titled "insisting that the hunter biden laptop is fake is a trap, so is insisting that it is real".
Nobody knows much of anything at this point....but shockingly one side "knows" it is real, and the other side "knows" it is a fake russian disinformation campaign. It is so predictable, and the truth doesn't even really matter.
Re: who ya got?
The source saying the emails are real is apparently some guy named Tony Bobulinski, a former business partner of Hunter, according to Rep Jim Jordan.
At least this unreliable(?) source isn't anonymous
BBC summary from a few days ago...
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-54553132
At least this unreliable(?) source isn't anonymous
BBC summary from a few days ago...
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-54553132
Re: who ya got?
Teal.....is it blue or is it green?
discuss
discuss
Nero is an angler in the lake of darkness
Re: who ya got?
I wonder how much of the Hunter investigation is some sorta...projection?
“I know you are but what am I?”
“I know you are but what am I?”
Re: who ya got?
The FBI had been warning that Guiliani was the focus of disinformation ops by the FSB. Borat makes him seem more than gullible. Classic rat-f$&king, from the party who pre-scandalizes every likely opponent. And Trump was rightly impeached for trying to build this scandal already. They just didn’t have any other ideas.
Re: who ya got?
Even FoxNews has discredited his account of things.IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:10 am The source saying the emails are real is apparently some guy named Tony Bobulinski, a former business partner of Hunter, according to Rep Jim Jordan.
At least this unreliable(?) source isn't anonymous
BBC summary from a few days ago...
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-54553132
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hunter ... -questions
Re: who ya got?
Did you read the entire article or just the headline?twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:36 amEven FoxNews has discredited his account of things.IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:10 am The source saying the emails are real is apparently some guy named Tony Bobulinski, a former business partner of Hunter, according to Rep Jim Jordan.
At least this unreliable(?) source isn't anonymous
BBC summary from a few days ago...
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-54553132
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hunter ... -questions
Re: who ya got?
The entire thing.IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:46 amDid you read the entire article or just the headline?twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:36 amEven FoxNews has discredited his account of things.IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:10 am The source saying the emails are real is apparently some guy named Tony Bobulinski, a former business partner of Hunter, according to Rep Jim Jordan.
At least this unreliable(?) source isn't anonymous
BBC summary from a few days ago...
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-54553132
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hunter ... -questions
Re: who ya got?
But the whole point of this foreign meddling is to get people to talk about Biden corruption. That's the game.IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:02 amI haven't fallen into any trap. I have already voted for Biden and would do so regardless.
I simply asked if they have been confirmed as real by someone in the emails... surely one of those always reliable "anonymous sources".
Even the Washington Post has an article out titled "insisting that the hunter biden laptop is fake is a trap, so is insisting that it is real".
Nobody knows much of anything at this point....but shockingly one side "knows" it is real, and the other side "knows" it is a fake russian disinformation campaign. It is so predictable, and the truth doesn't even really matter.
Re: who ya got?
I call BS, or your reading comprehension isn't great.twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:51 amThe entire thing.IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:46 amDid you read the entire article or just the headline?twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:36 am
Even FoxNews has discredited his account of things.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hunter ... -questions
It doesn't discredit his "account of things" or discredit the emails being real. It simply said the stuff he turned over doesn't show proof of the things about Joe Biden being involved in the business dealings.
That isn't the same.
Re: who ya got?
Even CNN says there is no evidence to support that this was a russian disinformation campaign.jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:58 amBut the whole point of this foreign meddling is to get people to talk about Biden corruption. That's the game.IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:02 amI haven't fallen into any trap. I have already voted for Biden and would do so regardless.
I simply asked if they have been confirmed as real by someone in the emails... surely one of those always reliable "anonymous sources".
Even the Washington Post has an article out titled "insisting that the hunter biden laptop is fake is a trap, so is insisting that it is real".
Nobody knows much of anything at this point....but shockingly one side "knows" it is real, and the other side "knows" it is a fake russian disinformation campaign. It is so predictable, and the truth doesn't even really matter.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/21/politics ... index.html
Re: who ya got?
That's not CNN saying anything. That's...the FBI not entering the political fray (which the DNI should not have done in the first place).
Again: this is exactly the point.
Again: this is exactly the point.
Re: who ya got?
If what the DNI said was untrue the FBI would have said so rather than saying they have nothing further to add.
Re: who ya got?
Eh, that's not what that says at all. "Nothing to add" isnt an agreement.IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:01 pmEven CNN says there is no evidence to support that this was a russian disinformation campaign.jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:58 amBut the whole point of this foreign meddling is to get people to talk about Biden corruption. That's the game.IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:02 am
I haven't fallen into any trap. I have already voted for Biden and would do so regardless.
I simply asked if they have been confirmed as real by someone in the emails... surely one of those always reliable "anonymous sources".
Even the Washington Post has an article out titled "insisting that the hunter biden laptop is fake is a trap, so is insisting that it is real".
Nobody knows much of anything at this point....but shockingly one side "knows" it is real, and the other side "knows" it is a fake russian disinformation campaign. It is so predictable, and the truth doesn't even really matter.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/21/politics ... index.html
Re: who ya got?
Thats not true at all. If their investigation is still ongoing then I would expect them not to add anything since their standard policy is to not comment on ongoing investigations.IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:15 pm If what the DNI said was untrue the FBI would have said so rather than saying they have nothing further to add.
Re: who ya got?
It's a miracle! The dirt Trump was impeached trying to dig up turns out to be here in time for the election.
Or: This is kind of what happened last time with emails. Let's try it again. It's not like Trump's former campaign manager went to jail or had anything to do with sleazy elements in Ukraine.
Or: This is kind of what happened last time with emails. Let's try it again. It's not like Trump's former campaign manager went to jail or had anything to do with sleazy elements in Ukraine.
Re: who ya got?
Again, do you know who John Ratcliffe is?IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:15 pm If what the DNI said was untrue the FBI would have said so rather than saying they have nothing further to add.
This is the fundamental problem with Trump. "Draining the swamp" meant replacing public servants with politicians and yes-men. You can't put a very partisan politician in a role and then complain when people don't believe that person's words.