Dumbfuck in charge

Ugh.
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 18704
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by jfish26 »

ousdahl wrote: Wed Nov 25, 2020 7:51 pm https://donaldjtrump2024.com/
How was that available.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by ousdahl »

The answer is right there in the link. Such a looser.

It’s in this thread title too!
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 21086
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by twocoach »

jfish26 wrote: Wed Nov 25, 2020 6:31 am Dumbfuck indeed.

That article was quite the eye opener. It really highlights the grip that Trump has over the Republican Party. And the threat of another Trump run in 2024 is going to continue to divide the party for the next four years.
Sparko
Contributor
Posts: 17335
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:01 pm

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Sparko »

Trump was epically terrible and inept; enabled by folks in the GOP who were not sanctioned by voters for enabling mayhem, death and destruction. That Fox alternative universe must be dismantled. We can't survive this kind of corrupt lunacy much longer.
User avatar
sdoyel
Posts: 12426
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2018 11:18 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by sdoyel »

What a looney. Some turkey day briefing he gave today...
"The real issue with covid: its not killing enough people." - randylahey

GTS Champ 2008
GTS Champ 2020*

“We good?” - Bill Self

RIP jhawk73

🇺🇦
User avatar
sdoyel
Posts: 12426
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2018 11:18 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by sdoyel »

"The real issue with covid: its not killing enough people." - randylahey

GTS Champ 2008
GTS Champ 2020*

“We good?” - Bill Self

RIP jhawk73

🇺🇦
User avatar
jhawks99
Contributor
Posts: 17477
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:34 am
Location: Woodbury, MN

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by jhawks99 »

I hope we didn't do this

https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/27/middleea ... index.html

Iran's top nuclear scientist, Mohsen Fakhrizadeh-Mahavadi, was killed on Friday near Tehran, state media has reported.
Defense. Rebounds.
Deleted User 289

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Deleted User 289 »

jhawks99 wrote: Fri Nov 27, 2020 10:09 am I hope we didn't do this

https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/27/middleea ... index.html

Iran's top nuclear scientist, Mohsen Fakhrizadeh-Mahavadi, was killed on Friday near Tehran, state media has reported.
I assume "we" did play a role in it.
You don't think Donny is in bed with Benny?

Gee, anyone think the timing is just a coincidence? I think not.
https://www.foxnews.com/world/israel-pr ... ran-report
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by ousdahl »

User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by ousdahl »

Big massive dumps


lulz
User avatar
sdoyel
Posts: 12426
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2018 11:18 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by sdoyel »

Lulz



"The real issue with covid: its not killing enough people." - randylahey

GTS Champ 2008
GTS Champ 2020*

“We good?” - Bill Self

RIP jhawk73

🇺🇦
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 18704
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by jfish26 »

His enfeebled brain is simply incapable of grasping defeat. It is shameful that mainline Republicans (Blunt, for example) continue to give this nonsense oxygen.
Sparko
Contributor
Posts: 17335
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:01 pm

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Sparko »

Funny how his feeble mind and Russian disinformation campaigns always align.
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 18704
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by jfish26 »

Sparko wrote: Mon Nov 30, 2020 11:16 am Funny how his feeble mind and Russian disinformation campaigns always align.
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/funny
adjective, fun·ni·er, fun·ni·est.

1. providing fun; causing amusement or laughter; amusing; comical:
a funny remark; a funny person.

2. attempting to amuse; facetious:
Did you really mean that or were you just being funny?

3. warranting suspicion; deceitful; underhanded:
We thought there was something funny about those extra charges.

4. Informal. insolent; impertinent:
Don't get funny with me, young man!

5. curious; strange; peculiar; odd:
Her speech has a funny twang.
Some of #3, some of #5.
Deleted User 89

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Deleted User 89 »

a whole lot of 3

but i’m sure i’m biased
Sparko
Contributor
Posts: 17335
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:01 pm

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Sparko »

Not #2 for sure. Strikes me as a Goodfellas rant with Trump.
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 18704
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by jfish26 »

Neither 1 nor 2 apply to anything Trump has ever said, done or thought. He is a startlingly unfunny (#1 and #2) man.
Deleted User 289

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Deleted User 289 »

Put this in perspective. OUR President is re-tweeting supportive things from "catturd".
This being one of them.




The same "catturd" who tweets gems such as.....











jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 18704
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by jfish26 »

Rudy has put forward "evidence" of nothing of substance. Because there is nothing of substance. There is no there there.

Don't you think that, if the campaign could identify any actual voter fraud - even something isolated and insignificant to any outcome - they'd be blowing that into the biggest and most widespread controversy of all time?

They're not doing that, because they don't even have that.

It's fucking toddler games: I have all of the evidence, boy do I, but since you're so corrupt I won't even show it to you!

My ten year old would see through this. Maybe my two year old.
Deleted User 89

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Deleted User 89 »

jfish26 wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 10:01 am Rudy has put forward "evidence" of nothing of substance. Because there is nothing of substance. There is no there there.

Don't you think that, if the campaign could identify any actual voter fraud - even something isolated and insignificant to any outcome - they'd be blowing that into the biggest and most widespread controversy of all time?

They're not doing that, because they don't even have that.

It's fucking toddler games: I have all of the evidence, boy do I, but since you're so corrupt I won't even show it to you!

My ten year old would see through this. Maybe my two year old.
your kids have better reasoning skills than so many adults in this country, as evidenced by the rubes that’s continue to send the criminals money
Post Reply