High-impact recruits?

Kansas Basketball.
RockChalk2005
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2021 7:01 pm

High-impact recruits?

Post by RockChalk2005 »

I'm a bit concerned that the current squad doesn't have the talent to compete at a high level.

Who do we have coming in next year that could potentially impact the game? Any 5-star recruits looking promising? We need help.
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 35792
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: High-impact recruits?

Post by pdub »

KJ Adams could be good.
ArgentineHawk
Posts: 1441
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 4:43 pm

Re: High-impact recruits?

Post by ArgentineHawk »

RockChalk2005 wrote: Sat Jan 30, 2021 7:02 pm I'm a bit concerned that the current squad doesn't have the talent to compete at a high level.

Who do we have coming in next year that could potentially impact the game? Any 5-star recruits looking promising? We need help.
The Jersey pg that we just signed, although he’s a 2022 recruit, even though I’ve heard that he could reclassify to this year.
User avatar
CrimsonNBlue
Posts: 17405
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am

Re: High-impact recruits?

Post by CrimsonNBlue »

RockChalk2005 wrote: Sat Jan 30, 2021 7:02 pm I'm a bit concerned that the current squad doesn't have the talent to compete at a high level.

Who do we have coming in next year that could potentially impact the game? Any 5-star recruits looking promising? We need help.
None at the moment.

Would be nice if we could get a high level junior PG that can shoot to reclassify.
RockChalk2005
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2021 7:01 pm

Re: High-impact recruits?

Post by RockChalk2005 »

Doesn't seem promising. We lack a dominant big that can reliably score inside. And while our perimeter is better, but I don't see how any of the incoming recruits will improve things next year. This looks to be a dismal stretch for Kansas basketball, especially with potential sanctions arriving in the next few months. Was hoping for some encouraging news on the recruiting front.
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 35792
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: High-impact recruits?

Post by pdub »

8-12 17 points.
Leading scorer.
RockChalk2005
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2021 7:01 pm

Re: High-impact recruits?

Post by RockChalk2005 »

pdub wrote: Sat Jan 30, 2021 7:09 pm8-12 17 points.
Fair play. But do you think that McCormack will compare to the likes of Dok, the Morris twins, Arthur, Aldrich, Embiid, Ellis, etc?
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 35792
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: High-impact recruits?

Post by pdub »

No.
He will be a solid senior.
Hes not our problem despite what most of this bored thinks.
mmoodyc
Posts: 90
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2018 12:32 am

Re: High-impact recruits?

Post by mmoodyc »

Dmac is sure different from Dok. Dok was in control defensively, but Dmac runs around, often out of the box which leaves easy cut for opponents. Yes he shoots better at the line and on the perimeter, but I rather see him dunk inside and grab rebounds. Have he even try dunking in a crowd like Dok?
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 35792
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: High-impact recruits?

Post by pdub »

The bigger problem is if we are supposed to be a perimeter team then we need to hit from the perimeter.

6-24.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: High-impact recruits?

Post by ousdahl »

If only this team had, like, a burger boy combo guard...
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: High-impact recruits?

Post by ousdahl »

I’m talking about Bryce Thompson
Last edited by ousdahl on Sat Jan 30, 2021 7:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: High-impact recruits?

Post by ousdahl »

And iPhone please stop changing Bryce to Bruce
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 35792
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: High-impact recruits?

Post by pdub »

Bryce will be back.
Wilson.
Ochai.
DMac.

I thought this team would get it together.
It may take a normalish offseason.
RockChalk2005
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2021 7:01 pm

Re: High-impact recruits?

Post by RockChalk2005 »

I want to believe you but I just don't see it. I think McCormack won't be a reliable scorer against quality bigs. Not in the way that our past bigs have been.

And our perimeter isn't elite. They're very good. But not dominant. We've always had some guards that could score. This team doesn't quite have it.
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 35792
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: High-impact recruits?

Post by pdub »

How many PPG is reliable?
Hes around 14 a game in the last 10 shooting over 50 percent.
RockChalk2005
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2021 7:01 pm

Re: High-impact recruits?

Post by RockChalk2005 »

pdub wrote: Sat Jan 30, 2021 7:25 pm How many PPG is reliable?
Hes around 14 a game in the last 10 shooting over 50 percent.
He's shooting 45% from 2 on the year. That's just not a great percentage for a big. Which is why I think we need a high-impact forward.
User avatar
randylahey
Posts: 8970
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm

Re: High-impact recruits?

Post by randylahey »

How our people complaining about mccormack? hes our only real scoring option on this team. our problem is not having a playmaker off the dribble
User avatar
randylahey
Posts: 8970
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm

Re: High-impact recruits?

Post by randylahey »

RockChalk2005 wrote: Sat Jan 30, 2021 7:40 pm
pdub wrote: Sat Jan 30, 2021 7:25 pm How many PPG is reliable?
Hes around 14 a game in the last 10 shooting over 50 percent.
He's shooting 45% from 2 on the year. That's just not a great percentage for a big. Which is why I think we need a high-impact forward.
hes near the top of the league in fg percentage. especiall in conference play. while being a focus of opposing defenses
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 35792
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: High-impact recruits?

Post by pdub »

Problems ranked.
-No lone player who can attack the basket with speed or create his own shot
- Perimeter shooting
- Consistent focus, especially on defense, throughout the game
- Attacking rebounds
- Ball distribution and handling
- Reliable inside scorer

Sorry to say but we have been so bad at things that DMacs play inside, especially of late, has actually been a positive ( 48% on the year, 52% last 10 ).

Wilson and Braun and Garrett are far more to blame for our loosing record on the new year than DMac.

Ochai is our best player and he shot, what, 3-11? In theory, because we have seen it working, our perimeter is better, but lately there isn’t evidence of that.
Post Reply