Again, if you can't understand the magnitude of the Capitol being taken over by people who had a desire to not only halt congress while in session but actually kill congress men and women - then you are a fool.Walrus wrote: ↑Thu Mar 04, 2021 12:19 pm Of course. The BLM riots were much more armed and deadly.
"FBI Finally Forced To Admit Jan 6 Was NOT An “Armed Insurrection” As Claimed By Democrats"
https://en-volve.com/2021/03/04/fbi-fin ... democrats/
I'm not going to minimize what occurred during the "BLM riots" but I sure as heck am not going to minimize what happened at the Capitol either - as you enjoy doing.
Do you know per capita how many people were at the Capitol vs ALL the BLM "riots", how many people were armed at the Capitol vs ALL the BLM "riots", and how many people died at the Capitol vs ALL the BLM "riots"? Neither do I so I'm not going to pretend which were "much more armed and deadly". Regardless, it's not a fucking contest or game.
Hitler was only responsible for 6 million Jews being killed but there were a lot more people killed during the Mao regime so Hitler really wasn't such a terrible guy. Right?
A person need not have a "firearm" to be considered "armed".
Even though there were people who in fact had "firearms" with them at the Capitol.
There are videos ( Including on YOUTUBE
) that clearly show people using objects as weapons. Some with chemical "spray", pipes and sticks, stun guns, laser pointers, brass knuckles, knives, etc. Were those people not "armed"?
