they’re gonna try and use Maxine Waters’ comments to suggest she biased jurors
Would you be on the Jury?
-
NewtonHawk11
- Posts: 12826
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:48 am
- Location: Kansas
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
And to a lesser extent, Biden's.
“I don’t remember anything he said, but it was a very memorable speech.” Julian Wright on a speech Michael Jordan gave to a group he was in
"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Somebody page Lobby
-
Deleted User 865
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
That's not how appeals really work. You need to attack the procedural aspects, not the facts. If it does come to a procedural thing, then the thing gets retried. Yes, there will be appeals, as any good attorney should use every bullet in the gun to protect their clients. However, this was a fairly straight forward case, with very straight forward evidence.
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
That is what she was trying to do.
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
procedural thing == bullshit technicality appeal
-
Deleted User 865
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Lol, if you think some random congresswoman from California is going to hold weight, especially when jurors are supposed to be avoiding the news anyway, then no case can ever stand. This was a high-profile case. That sort of outside influence is already built into the system. It's not grounds for appeal.
-
Deleted User 865
-
CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Almost always a point of error to raise. Raise, but not grant new trial.
Supposedly the Judge gave them the Maxine point yesterday after the mistrial denial. Frickin police union will definitely brief that one up.
Supposedly the Judge gave them the Maxine point yesterday after the mistrial denial. Frickin police union will definitely brief that one up.
-
Deleted User 89
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
talk to michvega wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 3:01 pmLol, if you think some random congresswoman from California is going to hold weight, especially when jurors are supposed to be avoiding the news anyway, then no case can ever stand. This was a high-profile case. That sort of outside influence is already built into the system. It's not grounds for appeal.TraditionKU wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 2:56 pmthey’re gonna try and use Maxine Waters’ comments to suggest she biased jurors
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
If there is no appeal, then i dum.
If there is an appeal, then ur dum.
If there is an appeal, then ur dum.
-
Deleted User 865
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
No, there will be appeals. There will be appeals in hours after a verdict if it's guilty. That's just how the system works. There will be appeals for months if not years.
But there will be no successful appeals.
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Too late.
I was arguing appeals and not successful appeals.
If there are appeals, ur dumb.
I was arguing appeals and not successful appeals.
If there are appeals, ur dumb.
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
What’s going on, they waiting to finish counting ballots in Nevada or something?
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Jurors running late...it’s almost like everybody today is stoned
-
CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Guilty
Guilty
Guilty
Guilty
Guilty