Would you be on the Jury?

Coffee talk.
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 21005
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: Would you be on the Jury?

Post by twocoach »

Glad to see a cop be held responsible for such an extreme callousness and depravity towards the community they served. Hopefully the next cop will give a few seconds of thought to what can be done to de-escalate the situation intead of relishing the technical right to escalate it to the next level.
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 35834
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: Would you be on the Jury?

Post by pdub »

twocoach wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 4:26 pm Glad to see a cop be held responsible for such an extreme callousness and depravity towards the community they served. Hopefully the next cop will give a few seconds of thought to what can be done to de-escalate the situation intead of relishing the technical right to escalate it to the next level.
Yes, hopefully this gives shitty police across the nation a bit of reality.
User avatar
NewtonHawk11
Posts: 12826
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:48 am
Location: Kansas

Re: Would you be on the Jury?

Post by NewtonHawk11 »

vega wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 4:10 pm
NewtonHawk11 wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 4:08 pm Surprised it was all 3. But it is the correct verdict.
I think the fact it took about as much time as to eat a steak dinner to come to a verdict means it wasn't even close. I mean usually you have at least one or two that want to hold out for a bit just because, but this was a clear cut case.
I'm just dumb in legalese and assumed if he got murder, the rest of the charges are irrelevant.
“I don’t remember anything he said, but it was a very memorable speech.” Julian Wright on a speech Michael Jordan gave to a group he was in

"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
Deleted User 865

Re: Would you be on the Jury?

Post by Deleted User 865 »

NewtonHawk11 wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 4:28 pm
vega wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 4:10 pm
NewtonHawk11 wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 4:08 pm Surprised it was all 3. But it is the correct verdict.
I think the fact it took about as much time as to eat a steak dinner to come to a verdict means it wasn't even close. I mean usually you have at least one or two that want to hold out for a bit just because, but this was a clear cut case.
I'm just dumb in legalese and assumed if he got murder, the rest of the charges are irrelevant.
No, you are proving the elements of each count.

So charge (1) you might need A, B, and C. Then charge (2), it's A, B, D. Then the most serious charge (3), it's A, B, C and D. You bring all three, because you want (3), but if you can't prove C, but you can show D, you can at least convict on (2).

If you can prove on A, B, C and D, you get all three, but you usually are sentenced concurrently if it's one action. So the max will likely be whatever (3) is. He could've been convicted on much more, but you don't want to muddy up the case too with extra charges. You want a clear cut case, so you charge on multiple counts, but not all the counts.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Would you be on the Jury?

Post by ousdahl »

Deleted User 865

Re: Would you be on the Jury?

Post by Deleted User 865 »

How it started....

Image

....how it ended

Image
User avatar
sdoyel
Posts: 12426
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2018 11:18 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Would you be on the Jury?

Post by sdoyel »

Next up:

"The real issue with covid: its not killing enough people." - randylahey

GTS Champ 2008
GTS Champ 2020*

“We good?” - Bill Self

RIP jhawk73

🇺🇦
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Would you be on the Jury?

Post by ousdahl »

if only one of those cops had at any point even just suggested easing up, maybe they wouldn’t be facing charges themselves. Who knows, maybe Floyd would still be alive!

But not one of them had the thought, even once. Not even out of any CYA instinct. Not even out of basic humanity.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Would you be on the Jury?

Post by ousdahl »

User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Would you be on the Jury?

Post by ousdahl »

Deleted User 865

Re: Would you be on the Jury?

Post by Deleted User 865 »

Oh shit, anyone looking for a job as the Raiders social media guy? Methinks an opening will be available tomorrow.

Image
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 21005
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: Would you be on the Jury?

Post by twocoach »

ousdahl wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 6:50 pm if only one of those cops had at any point even just suggested easing up, maybe they wouldn’t be facing charges themselves. Who knows, maybe Floyd would still be alive!

But not one of them had the thought, even once. Not even out of any CYA instinct. Not even out of basic humanity.
When you become that numbed to the people you serve then you should not have that job. The law enforcement system is full of people jaded by seeing the worst of us that it has affected how they treat the rest of us. It is a trained, ingrained callousness passed from generation to generation that rots our society from within.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Would you be on the Jury?

Post by ousdahl »

Whaddya mean they can breathe like they finally stopped coughing after ripping the bong too hard?


sorry, wrong thread
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Would you be on the Jury?

Post by ousdahl »

twocoach wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 7:08 pm
ousdahl wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 6:50 pm if only one of those cops had at any point even just suggested easing up, maybe they wouldn’t be facing charges themselves. Who knows, maybe Floyd would still be alive!

But not one of them had the thought, even once. Not even out of any CYA instinct. Not even out of basic humanity.
When you become that numbed to the people you serve then you should not have that job. The law enforcement system is full of people jaded by seeing the worst of us that it has affected how they treat the rest of us. It is a trained, ingrained callousness passed from generation to generation that rots our society from within.
I wonder how much of it is jaded, and how much is just some tough guy egotism. Cuz it turns out, those sortsa guys are attracted to that kind of work.

If we can’t outright abolish the police, we need to abolish the police psyche. Protect and serve, say it over and over. No more make my day bullshit.

Cops should work as if there’s a teenage girl live streaming every shift.
Deleted User 863

Re: Would you be on the Jury?

Post by Deleted User 863 »

twocoach wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 7:08 pm
ousdahl wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 6:50 pm if only one of those cops had at any point even just suggested easing up, maybe they wouldn’t be facing charges themselves. Who knows, maybe Floyd would still be alive!

But not one of them had the thought, even once. Not even out of any CYA instinct. Not even out of basic humanity.
When you become that numbed to the people you serve then you should not have that job. The law enforcement system is full of people jaded by seeing the worst of us that it has affected how they treat the rest of us. It is a trained, ingrained callousness passed from generation to generation that rots our society from within.
Weren't a few of the other cops there when the incident occurred new to the force?

Chauvin is just a POS shitty cop who is going to get what he deserves. It will hopefully make the other POS shitty cops out there think twice (no matter how small of a % of cops that is).
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Would you be on the Jury?

Post by ousdahl »

One thing I recall that I thought might have come up in the trial but never did:

The whole angle where Floyd and chauvin knew each other previously from both working as bouncers at the same bar or something?

Though I dunno what could have come from it, or if it would even be admissible.
Deleted User 863

Re: Would you be on the Jury?

Post by Deleted User 863 »

ousdahl wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 7:15 pm One thing I recall that I thought might have come up in the trial but never did:

The whole angle where Floyd and chauvin knew each other previously from both working as bouncers at the same bar or something?

Though I dunno what could have come from it, or if it would even be admissible.
Was that even true or just an internet rumor?
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Would you be on the Jury?

Post by ousdahl »

POS shitty cop. Shitty as a piece of shit.

I try to stay away from the ACAB but here’s one angle I’ve heard:

Yes, all cops are bastards. Even the good ones. They all swear the same oath to uphold the same laws that comes from the same system. And until they make it a habit to speak up more when other cops are being bastards, then yup, acab.
Leawood
Posts: 1444
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:18 am

Re: Would you be on the Jury?

Post by Leawood »

As the verdict was being read, a 15 year old black girl was shot dead by Columbus OH PD.
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 21005
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: Would you be on the Jury?

Post by twocoach »

BasketballJayhawk wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 7:15 pm
twocoach wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 7:08 pm
ousdahl wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 6:50 pm if only one of those cops had at any point even just suggested easing up, maybe they wouldn’t be facing charges themselves. Who knows, maybe Floyd would still be alive!

But not one of them had the thought, even once. Not even out of any CYA instinct. Not even out of basic humanity.
When you become that numbed to the people you serve then you should not have that job. The law enforcement system is full of people jaded by seeing the worst of us that it has affected how they treat the rest of us. It is a trained, ingrained callousness passed from generation to generation that rots our society from within.
Weren't a few of the other cops there when the incident occurred new to the force?

Chauvin is just a POS shitty cop who is going to get what he deserves. It will hopefully make the other POS shitty cops out there think twice (no matter how small of a % of cops that is).
Yes, one had only been on the job a matter of days as the next generation of cop and deferred to Chauvin's actions because he had been trained to.

"At one point, Lane asked, "Should we roll him on his side?" Chauvin responded: "No, staying put where we got him." Lane then said, "I am worried about excited delirium or whatever," to which Chauvin said, "That's why we have him on his stomach.""

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/after- ... 021-04-20/
Post Reply