ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 1:42 pm
One question I struggle with is, how much special treatment cops should get, particularly when it’s a question of potential misconduct.
If some publicly furnished cameras caught any other crime on record, how long would it take?
Or, say the apartment complex had its own private camera on the lot. Or if a journalist, or heck a teenage bystander with a camera phone (ever heard this one before?!)
Could the landlord/journalist/bystander be prevented from sharing his vid to the public? In the name of the investigation, whether into potential police misconduct or otherwise?
Maybe these hypos are silly tho
Not silly, just not particularly useful. The things that stick out to me are that precedent would be really hard to find because no one cares if it doesn't involve a police shooting. You just don't have people banging on the DA/Judge's door for footage in vast majority of crimes (if they're even on tape, which, rarely). ETA: read the DA's reasoning for asking for more days, it had to do with the mass publicity.
A big reason why no one cares about other hypos: police throw a public servant factor into the mix. Again, precedent hard to find (and body cam footage is very new in the grand scheme of it all), but it very well could be that video footage of police shootings is released publicly even quicker than video footage of crimes that are not police shootings.
Private cameras aren't a comparison because, like the teenager bystander, they can leak on their own.