COVID-19 - On the Ground
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
thanks for that
i’m not all that worried either, at least for myself/my family
i’m not all that worried either, at least for myself/my family
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Sure, but where's your youtube video?PhDhawk wrote: ↑Tue May 11, 2021 11:01 amhttps://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01274-7TraditionKU wrote: ↑Tue May 11, 2021 10:50 ami thought i read that there is an India-specific “triple mutant”? no?PhDhawk wrote: ↑Tue May 11, 2021 10:45 am
Yeah, but all the early evidence is that all the approved vaccines still offer protection against the mutant strains.
And the B.1.176 strain that is causing the most problems in India has been found in many countries, including the US, and they aren't having near the issues. The vaccines work and they appear to still work against all the more infectious mutant strains as well.
and, in some cases (don’t recall whether it’s strain or vaccine-dependent) there is reduced efficacy of the vaccines
IDPH Confirms B.1.617 Variant Strain in IowaIn just a few weeks, the B.1.617 variant has become the dominant strain across India and has spread to about 40 nations, including the United Kingdom, Fiji and Singapore.
https://idph.iowa.gov/News/ArtMID/646/A ... in-in-Iowa
From the Nature article:
Two weeks ago, it looked as if multiple variants were behind a series of surges in India. Genomic data indicated that B.1.1.7, first identified in the United Kingdom, was dominant in Delhi and the state of Punjab, and a new variant dubbed B.1.618 was present in West Bengal. B.1.617 was dominant in Maharashtra.
But since then, B.1.617 has overtaken B.1.618 in West Bengal, has become the leading variant in many states, and is increasing rapidly in Delhi. “In some states, the surge can be tied to 617,” Sujeet Singh, director of the National Centre for Disease Control, based in New Delhi, told journalists on 5 May.the P.1 variant, which is able to evade some immunity, contributed to a major second wave in Brazil early this year.In a detailed genomic and structural analysis of B.1.617 published as a preprint1 on 3 May, NIV scientists identified eight mutations in the virus’s spike protein, through which it gains entry to cells. Two of them look similar to mutations that have allowed other variants of concern to become more transmissible, and a third resembles a mutation that may have allowed P.1 to partially evade immunity.Similarly, the German team tested2 serum from 15 people who had previously been infected with SARS-CoV-2, and found that their antibodies neutralized B.1.617 about 50% less effectively than previously circulating strains. When they tested serum from participants who’d had two shots of the Pfizer vaccine, they found that the antibodies were about 67% less potent against B.1.617.Here's why I'm not yet worried:Two other small studies, one from Yadav’s team5 testing the Covaxin vaccine made by Indian firm Bharat Biotech in Hyderabad, and an as-yet-unpublished study on Covishield, showed that the vaccines continue to work. But Yadav observed small drops in the effectiveness of neutralizing antibodies generated by the Covaxin vaccine.
italicizing and bolding are mine.Scientists also warn that experiments in serum are not always a good guide to whether a variant can evade immunity from a vaccine in the real world. Vaccines can cause the production of vast quantities of antibodies, so a dip in potency might not be significant. Furthermore, other parts of the immune system, such as T cells, may not be affected.
For example, the B.1.351 variant has been linked to much steeper drops in the potency of neutralizing antibodies, but studies in humans suggest that many vaccines remain highly effective against that variant, particularly at preventing severe disease.
For these reasons, the vaccines are likely to remain effective against B.1.617 and to limit severe disease. “The vaccine is still working,” says Yadav. “If you get vaccinated, you “will be protected, and the severity will be less”.
Defense. Rebounds.
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
new study out of the UK indicates that even a single dose cuts transmissibility by half...and that’s just in the same household where there is prolonged close contact
www.gov.uk/government/news/one-dose-of- ... up-to-half
www.gov.uk/government/news/one-dose-of- ... up-to-half
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
99.75% of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 between Jan. 1 and April 13 were not fully vaccinated
https://www.axios.com/study-hospitalize ... 00a15.html
https://www.axios.com/study-hospitalize ... 00a15.html
I only came to kick some ass...
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Lobster Headline: THOUSANDS WORLDWIDE HOSPITALIZED AFTER RECEIVING EXPERIMENTAL VACCINEPhDhawk wrote: ↑Wed May 12, 2021 2:39 pm 99.75% of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 between Jan. 1 and April 13 were not fully vaccinated
https://www.axios.com/study-hospitalize ... 00a15.html
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
That's exactly the stats I have been curious about but failed to find. Thanks for postingPhDhawk wrote: ↑Wed May 12, 2021 2:39 pm 99.75% of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 between Jan. 1 and April 13 were not fully vaccinated
https://www.axios.com/study-hospitalize ... 00a15.html
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Another interesting one.
57 Top Scientists And Doctors Release Shocking Study On COVID Vaccines And Demand Immediate Stop to ALL Vaccinations
https://en-volve.com/2021/05/08/57-top- ... cinations/
57 Top Scientists And Doctors Release Shocking Study On COVID Vaccines And Demand Immediate Stop to ALL Vaccinations
https://en-volve.com/2021/05/08/57-top- ... cinations/
"This whole thing was a big dick-waving contest, it's just that my dick was bigger than yours."
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
lmao
google the first author in the list of “top” scientists
seriously lobs, do you even try to vet your sources?
google the first author in the list of “top” scientists
seriously lobs, do you even try to vet your sources?
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
did you even read the link?Walrus wrote: ↑Wed May 12, 2021 3:02 pm Another interesting one.
57 Top Scientists And Doctors Release Shocking Study On COVID Vaccines And Demand Immediate Stop to ALL Vaccinations
https://en-volve.com/2021/05/08/57-top- ... cinations/
there is no “study” that they released
they brought up concerns that they recommend be monitored...that’s about it
there is zero science in your link or the UNPUBLISHED “paper” they cite...it’s literally all opinion. and it’s not even the opinions of “top” scientists and doctors
i mean...seriously, just try and find their paper anywhere other than right-wing bunk websites. there is no citation or specific journal reference.
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Lobster philosophy:jfish26 wrote: ↑Wed May 12, 2021 2:54 pmLobster Headline: THOUSANDS WORLDWIDE HOSPITALIZED AFTER RECEIVING EXPERIMENTAL VACCINEPhDhawk wrote: ↑Wed May 12, 2021 2:39 pm 99.75% of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 between Jan. 1 and April 13 were not fully vaccinated
https://www.axios.com/study-hospitalize ... 00a15.html
Locks don't always work, better to leave your house unlocked.
Fire Extinguishers won't put out all fires, better to not have one
Sometimes toilets clog, better to shit in the living room.
I only came to kick some ass...
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
i’m honestly trying to help him be a better consumer of scientific information
he just can’t seem to get out of his own way
kinda funny though (and telling) that my work computer blocked his website, so i had to check it out on my phone
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
He also just posted that professors don't produce anything of value.TraditionKU wrote: ↑Wed May 12, 2021 3:30 pmdid you even read the link?Walrus wrote: ↑Wed May 12, 2021 3:02 pm Another interesting one.
57 Top Scientists And Doctors Release Shocking Study On COVID Vaccines And Demand Immediate Stop to ALL Vaccinations
https://en-volve.com/2021/05/08/57-top- ... cinations/
there is no “study” that they released
they brought up concerns that they recommend be monitored...that’s about it
there is zero science in your link or the UNPUBLISHED “paper” they cite...it’s literally all opinion. and it’s not even the opinions of “top” scientists and doctors
i mean...seriously, just try and find their paper anywhere other than right-wing bunk websites. there is no citation or specific journal reference.
Then posts a paper authored by professors for his argument.
He's nothing but a troll. A worthless troll who brings nothing of value.
I only came to kick some ass...
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
PhD's philosophy: No one has died from the covid vaccines, despite the fact we have verified confirmations of this. Aka, he denies reality because it doesn't fit with his desired outcome.
"This whole thing was a big dick-waving contest, it's just that my dick was bigger than yours."
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Even in the link you posted about the Astra Zeneca vaccine (which by the way, hasn't even been approved for use in the US), they said they were investigating the death of the pregnant woman. No causal link has been confirmed. AND...if it turns out she died from the vaccine (by the way, pregnant women were excluded from the clinical trials) that's still one death in Brazil that was caused by the vaccine compared to 425,000 caused by virus. Who knows how many hundreds of thousands of brazilian lives were SAVED by the vaccine?
I only came to kick some ass...
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Well, let's look at the J&J then. Of course the real numbers are much higher. The news is going to downplay anything that makes the vaccine look dangerous.
Yahoo:
" So far, three of the 28 have died. Previously, as of April 25, the CDC had reported 17 cases of clotting among nearly 8 million people given vaccines"
https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-cdc-says-i ... 15314.html
I'll add that in 1976 the US government stopped the swine flu vaccination after 55 people died. There were 47 million who took it. They stopped it because it was "dangerous." These covid vaccines are far more dangerous than the swine flu vaccine back then, so why are they still allowing them? The answer: $$$.
Yahoo:
" So far, three of the 28 have died. Previously, as of April 25, the CDC had reported 17 cases of clotting among nearly 8 million people given vaccines"
https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-cdc-says-i ... 15314.html
I'll add that in 1976 the US government stopped the swine flu vaccination after 55 people died. There were 47 million who took it. They stopped it because it was "dangerous." These covid vaccines are far more dangerous than the swine flu vaccine back then, so why are they still allowing them? The answer: $$$.
"This whole thing was a big dick-waving contest, it's just that my dick was bigger than yours."
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
but you were just touting the “news” in the thread on the poli board and their take on the stock marketWalrus wrote: ↑Wed May 12, 2021 3:48 pm Well, let's look at the J&J then. Of course the real numbers are much higher. The news is going to downplay anything that makes the vaccine look dangerous.
Yahoo:
" So far, three of the 28 have died. Previously, as of April 25, the CDC had reported 17 cases of clotting among nearly 8 million people given vaccines"
https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-cdc-says-i ... 15314.html
I'll add that in 1976 the US government stopped the swine flu vaccination after 55 people died. There were 47 million who took it. They stopped it because it was "dangerous." These covid vaccines are far more dangerous than the swine flu vaccine back then, so why are they still allowing them? The answer: $$$.
make up our fucking mind, numb nutz tucker carlson wannabe
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 6128
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2021 7:12 pm
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Some other gems from Lobsters "source"
https://en-volve.com/2021/05/11/watch-t ... about-him/
https://en-volve.com/2021/05/07/major-r ... ter-votes/
https://en-volve.com/2021/05/09/watch-5 ... ioweapons/
https://en-volve.com/2021/04/15/nancy-p ... t-fighter/
https://en-volve.com/2021/05/11/watch-t ... about-him/
https://en-volve.com/2021/05/07/major-r ... ter-votes/
https://en-volve.com/2021/05/09/watch-5 ... ioweapons/
https://en-volve.com/2021/04/15/nancy-p ... t-fighter/
“By way of contrast, I'm not the one who feels the need to respond to every post someone else makes”
Psych- Every Single Time
Psych- Every Single Time