The Great Outdoors

Coffee talk.
Deleted User 89

Re: The Great Outdoors

Post by Deleted User 89 »

Cascadia wrote: Fri May 07, 2021 4:17 pm
Love living in the PNW
yeah, i’m admittedly jealous
Deleted User 89

Re: The Great Outdoors

Post by Deleted User 89 »

well, we now know that Houston is home to at least one [escaped] tiger
Deleted User 89

Re: The Great Outdoors

Post by Deleted User 89 »

and speaking of big cats in the US...

https://newsroom.wcs.org/News-Releases/ ... he-US.aspx

Now is the Time to Think about Reintroducing Jaguars into the U.S.

Driven to extinction in the U.S. 50 years ago, reintroduction is key to recovery of “America’s Great Cat”...

... In a study published today in the journal Conservation Science and Practice, the authors provide a prospective framework for this effort and describe “righting a wrong” done to “America’s Great Cat” in the Southwest more than 50 years ago. The big cats lived for hundreds of years in the central mountains of Arizona and New Mexico but were driven to local extinction by the mid-20th century, in part because of killing by government hunters...

... However, habitat destruction, transportation infrastructure, natural constrictions in the landscape, and the border wall mean that natural reestablishment of female jaguars from source populations in Mexico to this recovery region is unlikely over the next 100 years.

The authors of today’s study conclude that reintroduction of jaguars should be examined as a viable alternative. The authors believe that restoring jaguars can be a net benefit to people, including culture and local economies, and nature and would represent the return of an original part of the U.S. fauna.. The study focuses on on five dimensions of the reintroduction project: conservation rationale, history, ecological context, human context and practical considerations.

“The jaguar lived in these mountains long before Americans did,” said Eric Sanderson, WCS Senior Conservation Ecologist and lead author of the study. “If done collaboratively, reintroduction could enhance the economy of this region and the ecology of this incredible part of jaguar range...”
Deleted User 89

Re: The Great Outdoors

Post by Deleted User 89 »

idaho...smfh

i can understand some wolf culling, but to allow up to 90% to be killed? even allowing for inhumane and unethical methods

sad
User avatar
TDub
Contributor
Posts: 15222
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 9:32 am

Re: The Great Outdoors

Post by TDub »

Yea, thats a bad idea.
Just Ledoux it
Deleted User 89

Re: The Great Outdoors

Post by Deleted User 89 »

Deleted User 89

Re: The Great Outdoors

Post by Deleted User 89 »

Did that octopus just punch a fish?

https://www.bbc.com/news/av/science-env ... t-55426584
Deleted User 89

Re: The Great Outdoors

Post by Deleted User 89 »

https://defenders.org/newsroom/capitol- ... l-strategy

On May 19, the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works held a full committee hearing about biodiversity loss and the drivers, impacts and potential solutions. The event featured Dr. Leah Gerber, founding director of the Center for Biodiversity Outcomes and Professor of Conservation Science at Arizona State University. Gerber is also a Defenders of Wildlife Science Advisor.

“More species of plants and animals are threatened with extinction now than at any other time in human history,” said Gerber during the hearing. “Twenty-five percent of all species – including 40% of amphibians and 30% of marine mammals – are threatened with extinction. And we’re not talking about just extinction, we’re also talking about the general decline of nature.”...
Deleted User 89

Re: The Great Outdoors

Post by Deleted User 89 »

look at all these beautiful cicadas...

https://slate.com/technology/2021/05/ph ... tiful.html
User avatar
jhawks99
Contributor
Posts: 17012
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:34 am
Location: Woodbury, MN

Re: The Great Outdoors

Post by jhawks99 »

None here yet. They keep saying we're gonna get a ton of em.
Broham
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: The Great Outdoors

Post by ousdahl »

Who was it!



User avatar
jhawks99
Contributor
Posts: 17012
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:34 am
Location: Woodbury, MN

Re: The Great Outdoors

Post by jhawks99 »

Tourons
Broham
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 34930
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: The Great Outdoors

Post by pdub »

“Heavyset.”
BODY SHAMING!
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: The Great Outdoors

Post by ousdahl »

Oh come on, I’ve seen way heavier bears.
Deleted User 89

Re: The Great Outdoors

Post by Deleted User 89 »

jhawks99 wrote: Tue May 25, 2021 5:19 pmTourons
idiots
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 34930
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: The Great Outdoors

Post by pdub »

They edited out "heavyset".
Lol.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: The Great Outdoors

Post by ousdahl »

Holy balls!

User avatar
jhawks99
Contributor
Posts: 17012
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:34 am
Location: Woodbury, MN

Re: The Great Outdoors

Post by jhawks99 »

Yikes
Broham
User avatar
TDub
Contributor
Posts: 15222
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 9:32 am

Re: The Great Outdoors

Post by TDub »

Dumb
Just Ledoux it
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: The Great Outdoors

Post by ousdahl »

Oh!

Had a pine marten run across the porch the other morning. Had never seen one in my neighborhood before, but of course they’re around.

Now house sitting, quietly enjoying coffee while the dogs lounge, a fox runs through the yard and all hell breaks lose. BARK BARK BARK! DEFEND THE COLONY! BARK BARK GET OFF MY LAWN!!!
Post Reply