Just yankin your chain, I get it. Hospitals need to staff up. Mrs 99's hospital is closing a floor to consolidate staff. They are especially short on techs.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Fri Aug 27, 2021 1:21 pmWho's to say we all haven't at one point?jhawks99 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 27, 2021 1:19 pmOk, you get the guy who got a D- in doctorin.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Fri Aug 27, 2021 12:55 pm
I get it. But at least expediting the process needs to happen. Lot of the requirements are on-the-job anyway, right? I think temporary relaxed requirements are already happening here--I know they are elsewhere.
COVID-19 - On the Ground
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Defense. Rebounds.
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Based on the number who won't get a safe life protecting shot, I'd say a lot have.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Fri Aug 27, 2021 1:21 pmWho's to say we all haven't at one point?jhawks99 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 27, 2021 1:19 pmOk, you get the guy who got a D- in doctorin.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Fri Aug 27, 2021 12:55 pm
I get it. But at least expediting the process needs to happen. Lot of the requirements are on-the-job anyway, right? I think temporary relaxed requirements are already happening here--I know they are elsewhere.
I only came to kick some ass...
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
- randylahey
- Posts: 8970
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Learn math or don't post.
I only came to kick some ass...
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
But you're against vaccine requirements because you say it violates people's freedom. What about the freedom of the guy who dies because he can't be seen by the hospital because they're overwhelmed by Covid patients.randylahey wrote: ↑Fri Aug 27, 2021 2:13 pmI am vaccinated. so... whats your point bud? check your emotions or dont post
Jesus, could you miss the point any worse...
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
No, he couldn't. He's incredibly stupid.Mjl wrote: ↑Fri Aug 27, 2021 2:32 pmBut you're against vaccine requirements because you say it violates people's freedom. What about the freedom of the guy who dies because he can't be seen by the hospital because they're overwhelmed by Covid patients.randylahey wrote: ↑Fri Aug 27, 2021 2:13 pmI am vaccinated. so... whats your point bud? check your emotions or dont post
Jesus, could you miss the point any worse...
I only came to kick some ass...
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
I was a little ticked off that I felt the need to explain logic to a kid (about 18, 19 years old) in the Nike store today. He was basically boasting that he isn't vaccinated and his excuse was that his doctor told him he is very healthy and if he gets Covid he should be ok. I then asked him if he gets Covid and passes it on to my 88 year old mother - will she be ok? He just kind of shrugged his shoulders. I told him forget about my mother but not to forget about those he does care about that he could "infect".
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
in the 18,19 year olds defense, if he gets covid, he will be fine.
above all the elderly and the compromised need to be cautious.
so rather than mandate a healthy 18, 19 year old, why don't the elderly and the compromised take their precautions.
something to think about.
my mother is 91. My nephew is 18. is there a one size fit all cookie cutter approach.
something to think about.
let the hysteria begin.
above all the elderly and the compromised need to be cautious.
so rather than mandate a healthy 18, 19 year old, why don't the elderly and the compromised take their precautions.
something to think about.
my mother is 91. My nephew is 18. is there a one size fit all cookie cutter approach.
something to think about.
let the hysteria begin.
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Sometimes I wonder if you're Norman BatesNotGutterGutter wrote: ↑Fri Aug 27, 2021 2:37 pm I was a little ticked off that I felt the need to explain logic to a kid (about 18, 19 years old) in the Nike store today. He was basically boasting that he isn't vaccinated and his excuse was that his doctor told him he is very healthy and if he gets Covid he should be ok. I then asked him if he gets Covid and passes it on to my 88 year old mother - will she be ok? He just kind of shrugged his shoulders. I told him forget about my mother but not to forget about those he does care about that he could "infect".
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
I agree, but realistically do any of you really expect almost 100% of our citizens to get a shot every 8 months for the rest of their lives? We're at nearly 75% right now, but nearly 33% of those are nearing time for a booster and it starts all over.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Fri Aug 27, 2021 2:46 pmYes. Get a vaccine that has been dosed nearly 6 billion times to date.
There is no feasible way to force vaccinate the unwilling every 8 months imo.
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
try 5 months. the administration is preparing to recommend after 5 months.
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Some things to consider....
This isn't the worst it has been during the entire pandemic as far as new cases go, but it's close.....and it's happening with close to 75% of our population at least partially vaccinated.
Our hospital system is stressed in many areas....and it's happening with close to 75% of our population at least partially vaccinated.
Bottom line: the vaccine isn't enough on it's own.
We should be in another lockdown right now....but we aren't. Why is that?
This isn't the worst it has been during the entire pandemic as far as new cases go, but it's close.....and it's happening with close to 75% of our population at least partially vaccinated.
Our hospital system is stressed in many areas....and it's happening with close to 75% of our population at least partially vaccinated.
Bottom line: the vaccine isn't enough on it's own.
We should be in another lockdown right now....but we aren't. Why is that?
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
I have told this anecdote before, but here it is anyway and germane. When I was a TA in Organic Chemistry, while I was a grad student, given that a large majority of my students had aspirations of going on to medical school, I used to semi-jokingly say that we TAs were the last line of defense in ensuring the quality of future medical care in this country.
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
A. YOU assume the kid will be fine - and he very well may be - but........ There have been teenagers who had Covid and were not "fine".MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Fri Aug 27, 2021 2:45 pm in the 18,19 year olds defense, if he gets covid, he will be fine.
above all the elderly and the compromised need to be cautious.
so rather than mandate a healthy 18, 19 year old, why don't the elderly and the compromised take their precautions.
something to think about.
have lo
my mother is 91. My nephew is 18. is there a one size fit all cookie cutter approach.
something to think about.
let the hysteria begin.
B. Yes, the elderly and the compromised need to be cautious. Or at least should be cautious.
Just as I am cautious - knowing that I am around other people each and every day. Many of who I don't know if they are "compromised".
C. I'm against "mandates". I'm 100% FOR people to care about others and not just themself.
D. I'm not sure about one size fit all approaches but I'm pretty sure the virus doesn't give a shit how old you are.
E. To me, "hysteria" is almost as dangerous as negligence but I get really pissed off when people minimize the virus. That's just plain stupid to me.
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Mandates are way more realistic.NotGutterGutter wrote: ↑Fri Aug 27, 2021 4:07 pmI'm against "mandates". I'm 100% FOR people to care about others and not just themself.
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Quit assuming that will be the case.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Aug 27, 2021 3:25 pmI agree, but realistically do any of you really expect almost 100% of our citizens to get a shot every 8 months for the rest of their lives? We're at nearly 75% right now, but nearly 33% of those are nearing time for a booster and it starts all over.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Fri Aug 27, 2021 2:46 pmYes. Get a vaccine that has been dosed nearly 6 billion times to date.
There is no feasible way to force vaccinate the unwilling every 8 months imo.
I doubt very seriously that we'd be getting an 8 month booster if the number of infected was lower.
It doesn't start all over. Healthy individuals who are vaccinnated don't lose all the protective benefits after 8 months, but on average it falls below some threshold. You get a booster and you at a higher level of protection. We don't yet know how long the third shot will offer protection for, it might make it a lot longer.
And it's not 75%, it's about 53% that are fully vaxxed right now.
And why shouldn't we expect people to do the right thing and get vaccinated. I expect people not to murder me, or sucker punch me.
I only came to kick some ass...
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
I hope you're right.PhDhawk wrote: ↑Fri Aug 27, 2021 5:07 pmQuit assuming that will be the case.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Aug 27, 2021 3:25 pmI agree, but realistically do any of you really expect almost 100% of our citizens to get a shot every 8 months for the rest of their lives? We're at nearly 75% right now, but nearly 33% of those are nearing time for a booster and it starts all over.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Fri Aug 27, 2021 2:46 pm
Yes. Get a vaccine that has been dosed nearly 6 billion times to date.
There is no feasible way to force vaccinate the unwilling every 8 months imo.
I doubt very seriously that we'd be getting an 8 month booster if the number of infected was lower.
It doesn't start all over. Healthy individuals who are vaccinnated don't lose all the protective benefits after 8 months, but on average it falls below some threshold. You get a booster and you at a higher level of protection. We don't yet know how long the third shot will offer protection for, it might make it a lot longer.
I still think we should be in lockdowns right now if we are really trying to make a meaningful impact on the virus circulating. What we are doing isn't working. It's a lot of lip service and finger pointing. Lockdowns work at stopping the spread of the virus. They worked before the vaccine. They'd work even better now.
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
the more that are vaccinated, the less opportunities there are for novel variants