COVID-19 - On the Ground

[twocoach]

Pretty sure Randy has never argued that the vaccines aren't a huge positive. But maybe i missed it?

You dumb fuck.

Still stand by the fact that most people don't need vaxed.

On a solely individual level most people don't "need" vaxxed for covid.

Death or serious long term complications are ridiculously rare. Especially when factoring in that something like 50% of cases are asymptomatic and never identified because the vast majority of asymptomatic cases/people don't go get tested to count on the running totals being kept for various things.

It's also exceedingly rare that any one car trip results in a fatal accident. Last data I see is 10.4 fatal accidents per 100 million person-trips.

Shall we remove seat belt laws and tell car manufacturers that we'd rather our cars be cheaper and not have air bags? What if I prefer the freedum of not wearing a seat belt?

[pdub]

Well, on that analogy, I don't think buckling your seat belt should be a law, personally.
But I do think that it should be mandated that there are seat belts and airbags in every car.

[Deleted User 863]

Well, on that analogy, I don't think buckling your seat belt should be a law, personally.
But I do think that it should be mandated that there are seat belts and airbags in every car.

That was a piss poor attempt at an anology by BROcoach.

[Deleted User 863]

how many threads just on this site do you want links to?

i never said randy doesn’t view the vaccines as a positive, despite what you might think

try paying better attention. it’ll improve everyone’s enjoyment here

You posted this less than 5 posts ago...

the vaccines are a huge positive. that YOU fail to see that is on you

You just said Randy fails to see that the vaccines are a huge positive.

you really are an idiot

randy was accusing most everyone else of only seeing the negatives, when in fact many of us are posting why the vaccine is such a positive

keep arguing though...wear that ignorance proudly

Gotta love it. Randy has you on TILT!

Deep breathing should help. Think positive thoughts.

[twocoach]

Well, on that analogy, I don't think buckling your seat belt should be a law, personally.
But I do think that it should be mandated that there are seat belts and airbags in every car.

And like with the unvaccinated, I think that if anyone who chooses not to use a seat belt gets in a car accident requiring medical attention that they not be given priority over any other patients.

My sister takes a harsher but similar approach to helmet laws in that they should all be removed so that the idiots are sorted out of the gene pool by natural selection.

[twocoach]

Well, on that analogy, I don't think buckling your seat belt should be a law, personally.
But I do think that it should be mandated that there are seat belts and airbags in every car.

That was a piss poor attempt at an anology by BROcoach.

You're like a toddler. What is wrong with you?

[pdub]

Well, on that analogy, I don't think buckling your seat belt should be a law, personally.
But I do think that it should be mandated that there are seat belts and airbags in every car.

And like with the unvaccinated, I think that if anyone who chooses not to use a seat belt gets in a car accident requiring medical attention that they not be given priority over any other patients.

My sister takes a harsher but similar approach to helmet laws in that they should all be removed so that the idiots are sorted out of the gene pool by natural selection.

In theory this would work - if it's eye for eye.
But in practice, no, what would the logistics be?
Seatbeltless victims get a number at a hospital and keep getting put on the backburner if other patients come in with non life threatening injuries and then seatbeltless victim dies?

No.

[Deleted User 89]

Well, on that analogy, I don't think buckling your seat belt should be a law, personally.
But I do think that it should be mandated that there are seat belts and airbags in every car.

And like with the unvaccinated, I think that if anyone who chooses not to use a seat belt gets in a car accident requiring medical attention that they not be given priority over any other patients.

My sister takes a harsher but similar approach to helmet laws in that they should all be removed so that the idiots are sorted out of the gene pool by natural selection.

when the wife and i visited Mesa Verde, the park ranger that guided us through one of the main structures made a similar comment about the lack of “fencing” at the edge of the caves

selection quickly eliminates the idiots, or the children of idiots

[twocoach]

Well, on that analogy, I don't think buckling your seat belt should be a law, personally.
But I do think that it should be mandated that there are seat belts and airbags in every car.

And like with the unvaccinated, I think that if anyone who chooses not to use a seat belt gets in a car accident requiring medical attention that they not be given priority over any other patients.

My sister takes a harsher but similar approach to helmet laws in that they should all be removed so that the idiots are sorted out of the gene pool by natural selection.

In theory this would work - if it's eye for eye.
But in practice, no, what would the logistics be?
Seatbeltless victims get a number at a hospital and keep getting put on the backburner if other patients come in with non life threatening injuries and then seatbeltless victim dies?

No.

Or we could just require them.

[twocoach]

Well, on that analogy, I don't think buckling your seat belt should be a law, personally.
But I do think that it should be mandated that there are seat belts and airbags in every car.

And like with the unvaccinated, I think that if anyone who chooses not to use a seat belt gets in a car accident requiring medical attention that they not be given priority over any other patients.

My sister takes a harsher but similar approach to helmet laws in that they should all be removed so that the idiots are sorted out of the gene pool by natural selection.

In theory this would work - if it's eye for eye.
But in practice, no, what would the logistics be?
Seatbeltless victims get a number at a hospital and keep getting put on the backburner if other patients come in with non life threatening injuries and then seatbeltless victim dies?

No.

Or we could just legally require them to help save stupid people from themselves.

[pdub]

If someone jumps off a bridge and lives, do they go to the back of the line for the hospital?

If someone overdoses on heroin, do they go to the back of the line?

[MICHHAWK]

Or we could just legally require them to help save stupid people from themselves.

the U.S. government is never going to make the vaxx mandatory. but keep fighting the good fight. there are 13 people on a college basketball chat board hanging on your every word.

[Deleted User 863]

Well, on that analogy, I don't think buckling your seat belt should be a law, personally.
But I do think that it should be mandated that there are seat belts and airbags in every car.

That was a piss poor attempt at an anology by BROcoach.

You're like a toddler. What is wrong with you?

Sorry bro

[twocoach]

Or we could just legally require them to help save stupid people from themselves.

the U.S. government is never going to make the vaxx mandatory. but keep fighting the good fight. there are 13 people on a college basketball chat board hanging on your every word.

Oh, I fully understand that it won't happen. It's just proving out why as a nation and as communities we end up having to mandate societal practices that should be common sense.

No one ever seems to ask for the freedom to do smart things, just stupid things.

[Deleted User 863]

If someone jumps off a bridge and lives, do they go to the back of the line for the hospital?

If someone overdoses on heroin, do they go to the back of the line?

No more treatment for lung cancer patients either if they are smokers.

Let em die!

Am i doing this right?

So many compassionate people here. Don't agree with every little thing they want and they want medical care taken from you. LOL

Didn't wear a seatbelt? Let em die!

[MICHHAWK]

all you are proving out is that social media is the worst invention in the history of mankind.

[Deleted User 863]

Brocoach is a prime example of why i think the left is nauseating.

[twocoach]

If someone jumps off a bridge and lives, do they go to the back of the line for the hospital?

If someone overdoses on heroin, do they go to the back of the line?

No more treatment for lung cancer patients either if they are smokers.

Let em die!

Am i doing this right?

So many compassionate people here. Don't agree with every little thing they want and they want medical care taken from you. LOL

Didn't wear a seatbelt? Let em die!

It's not whatI think should happen. It's just examples of what happen when you apply the selfishness of such thought uniformly.

[twocoach]

Brocoach is a prime example of why i think the left is nauseating.

You don't even understand the point I am failing to make...

(That is me making fun of my own rushed, distracted posting)

[Deleted User 89]

fwiw, insurance companies are already doing what they do...to smokers and anti-vaxers

hooray for capitalism and the free market!!