Da Weed Thread

Coffee talk.
User avatar
TDub
Contributor
Posts: 15573
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 9:32 am

Re: Da Weed Thread

Post by TDub »

I dont care about her coping with grief. I dont care that she smoked weed. I dont about any of that and i understand it. But the choices and consequences are laid out and the path we take is ours. No big deal, but im not going to feel bad that she got a ban either. Its pretty clear cut until the rules are changed. This isnt rocket science.
Just Ledoux it
Deleted User 863

Re: Da Weed Thread

Post by Deleted User 863 »

ousdahl wrote: Wed Jul 07, 2021 11:14 am It’s not that I disagree with that.

It’s that loosing one’s mother might be among the few times for which the weight of that situation might be heavier than the even the Olympics - or perhaps more simply, just the threat of whether you’ll be tested.

Do you fault her for trying to cope with her grief? Cuz I guess I don’t.

Do you think she did it to try and gain some otherwise impermissible competitive advantage? I guess I don’t either.

But if we really wanna put all our chips down for this one, let’s test the Olympic administrators too, and see how much they actually care about The Rules.
I don't think she did anything wrong morally.

I also don't think they're doing anything wrong by enforcing the rules she knew about when she decided to break them.

Do i think weed is a performance enhancer? Definitely not for a track athlete. But rules are rules.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Da Weed Thread

Post by ousdahl »

Yeah. Like I said, this isn’t Nam.

But do you think her team reacted appropriately? They cut off their nose to spite their face and snubbed their best performer even after her punishment would have been served. I think it speaks to just how stuffy the Olympics still is.

Btw weed is prohibited in pretty much every competitive sport ever, so if you guys are really worried less about whether they smoke weed and more about the sanctity of The Rules, I’d stop watching college and nba ball right quick, among others.
Last edited by ousdahl on Wed Jul 07, 2021 11:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
TDub
Contributor
Posts: 15573
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 9:32 am

Re: Da Weed Thread

Post by TDub »

ousdahl wrote: Wed Jul 07, 2021 11:22 am Yeah. Like I said, this isn’t Nam.

But do you think her team reacted appropriately? They cut off their nose to spite their face and snubbed their best performer is silly too. I think it speaks to just how stuffy the Olympics still is.

Btw weed is prohibited in pretty much every competitive sport ever, so if you guys are really worried less about whether they smoke weed and more about the sanctity of The Rules, I’d stop watching college and nba ball right quick, among others.
If they get caught and get suspensions my reaction is the same.
Just Ledoux it
User avatar
TDub
Contributor
Posts: 15573
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 9:32 am

Re: Da Weed Thread

Post by TDub »

Difference is olympics is 4 years and the window is short for a sprinter. Basketball player misses a couple games....then theyre right back. Miss the Olympics that might be your only shot.
Just Ledoux it
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Da Weed Thread

Post by ousdahl »

Well, go back to the Darnell analogy.

He broke The Rules. He served his time.

Are you upset KU didn’t add to the suspension?
Deleted User 89

Re: Da Weed Thread

Post by Deleted User 89 »

ousdahl wrote: Wed Jul 07, 2021 11:22 am Yeah. Like I said, this isn’t Nam.

But do you think her team reacted appropriately? They cut off their nose to spite their face and snubbed their best performer even after her punishment would have been served. I think it speaks to just how stuffy the Olympics still is.

Btw weed is prohibited in pretty much every competitive sport ever, so if you guys are really worried less about whether they smoke weed and more about the sanctity of The Rules, I’d stop watching college and nba ball right quick, among others.
was it her team, or the US Track and Field admins that made the call? i doubt her relay team (assuming that’s who you were referencing) made the call
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Da Weed Thread

Post by ousdahl »

That’s a good question. Trying to confirm who exactly chose not to select her.

I think it’s cuz the positive weed test invalidates her qualifying times or whatever. Lol
User avatar
TDub
Contributor
Posts: 15573
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 9:32 am

Re: Da Weed Thread

Post by TDub »

ousdahl wrote: Wed Jul 07, 2021 11:26 am Well, go back to the Darnell analogy.

He broke The Rules. He served his time.

Are you upset KU didn’t add to the suspension?
Where have i given you that idea?
Just Ledoux it
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Da Weed Thread

Post by ousdahl »

I guess the issue I’m trying to discuss is, whether it was appropriate to deny her the chance to compete even after her suspension had been served.

You mention a “couple games” for a basketball player’s punishment for weed, and that a runner may have an even shorter career window.

Do you think the 30 day suspension and the subsequent missing out on competition after time served is appropriate? At what point could The Rules go too far?
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 35962
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: Da Weed Thread

Post by pdub »

ousdahl wrote: Wed Jul 07, 2021 12:19 pm That’s a good question. Trying to confirm who exactly chose not to select her.

I think it’s cuz the positive weed test invalidates her qualifying times or whatever. Lol
I get what you are saying, that its lol that weed would help her times, but she broke the rules. Not smoking weed for a period of time shouldn't be difficult.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Da Weed Thread

Post by ousdahl »

speak for yourself.

Now if you’ll excuse me, I’ll be in the ladies restroom with hawklin.
User avatar
TDub
Contributor
Posts: 15573
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 9:32 am

Re: Da Weed Thread

Post by TDub »

ousdahl wrote: Wed Jul 07, 2021 12:40 pm I guess the issue I’m trying to discuss is, whether it was appropriate to deny her the chance to compete even after her suspension had been served.

You mention a “couple games” for a basketball player’s punishment for weed, and that a runner may have an even shorter career window.

Do you think the 30 day suspension and the subsequent missing out on competition after time served is appropriate? At what point could The Rules go too far?
It really doesn't matter what I think the rules should be. Its been established what they are....play by them and compete or don't and don't. If theu change later on then you can revaluate your choices to remain in compliance.
Just Ledoux it
Deleted User 89

Re: Da Weed Thread

Post by Deleted User 89 »

cannabis has more genes (~38K) in its genome than do humans (~30K)
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Da Weed Thread

Post by ousdahl »

Senate Democrats unveiling push to legalize marijuana at federal level

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/562 ... eral-level
Deleted User 89

Re: Da Weed Thread

Post by Deleted User 89 »

kinda surprised it’s happening first in the senate
Deleted User 89

Re: Da Weed Thread

Post by Deleted User 89 »

bad parents, not bad weed

https://ctmirror.org/2021/07/19/legaliz ... poisoning/

though, what’d they expect when they allowed edibles with the shape and look of regular candy?
Deleted User 89

Re: Da Weed Thread

Post by Deleted User 89 »

User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Da Weed Thread

Post by ousdahl »

Guess who’s gonna check out these Great Lake state dispensaries today!

Gonna tell my parents I need to run out cuz I forgot, uh, deodorant
Deleted User 863

Re: Da Weed Thread

Post by Deleted User 863 »

ousdahl wrote: Mon Sep 20, 2021 11:57 am Guess who’s gonna check out these Great Lake state dispensaries today!

Gonna tell my parents I need to run out cuz I forgot, uh, deodorant
Do they sell recreational Marijuana in Michigan?

I was thinking it was legal there, but no dispenseraries for recreational use, only medical use?
Post Reply