21-22 lineup

Kansas Basketball.
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 34928
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by pdub »

ousdahl wrote: Thu Oct 14, 2021 9:40 am While I don’t disagree that maybe Garrett wasn’t the pg we needed last year, I also can’t help but wonder if it’s “blame the quarterback” syndrome.

Cuz at the same time, Garrett was the only guy from last year’s roster to earn an nba deal, despite other dudes trying to too.
Well, he was kind of the quarterback, some people had him as a Naismith candidate in preseason.
So, while it can be unfair, that was HIS team.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by ousdahl »

pdub wrote: Thu Oct 14, 2021 9:41 am Garrett shot 66 3's, just 2 more than Ellis did his senior year.
So yes, minutes played + 3 pointers shot + 3 point percentage is a factor.
I will give credit for Ellis being statistically the best shooting “big” we’ve had.

But yea, stats aside, I’d rather have either Morris taking that shot if we needed it.

ETA or Dedric!
Last edited by ousdahl on Thu Oct 14, 2021 9:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by ousdahl »

pdub wrote: Thu Oct 14, 2021 9:42 am
ousdahl wrote: Thu Oct 14, 2021 9:40 am While I don’t disagree that maybe Garrett wasn’t the pg we needed last year, I also can’t help but wonder if it’s “blame the quarterback” syndrome.

Cuz at the same time, Garrett was the only guy from last year’s roster to earn an nba deal, despite other dudes trying to too.
Well, he was kind of the quarterback, some people had him as a Naismith candidate in preseason.
So, while it can be unfair, that was HIS team.
Yea, it’s Garrett’s fault Och Braun and Jalen bricked all those open looks, and couldn’t get to the rim if their life depended on it.
User avatar
CrimsonNBlue
Posts: 17405
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by CrimsonNBlue »

ousdahl wrote: Thu Oct 14, 2021 9:40 am While I don’t disagree that maybe Garrett wasn’t the pg we needed last year, I also can’t help but wonder if it’s “blame the quarterback” syndrome.

Cuz at the same time, Garrett was the only guy from last year’s roster to earn an nba deal, despite other dudes trying to too.
It's a quite different game with different roles, but Garrett had nothing to gain (pro-wise) by coming back. Would probably have hurt that aspect, actually.
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 34928
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by pdub »

"I’d rather have either Morris taking that shot if we needed it."

Errr, I wouldn't.
Ellis 43.8% 3FG, 66 3's attempted.
Kief 42.4% 3FG, 59 3's attempted.
Marcus 34.2% 3FG, 76 3's attempted.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by ousdahl »

Yeah, prob not.

Unless…

For that matter what did Och have to gain by coming back? Show he can be a more consistent shooter plus get to the rim more?

How does that not apply to Garrett too?

But yeah I do agree Garrett prob did max out the development he stood to gain in college, and prob had more to loose by returning
User avatar
CrimsonNBlue
Posts: 17405
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by CrimsonNBlue »

This goes to the game changing in the few years after the twins left, but I think Perry would have also benefitted (at KU) by being a couple years younger and getting an older version of Bill Self.

Perry always had the ability to shoot 40%+ from 3 on 100 attempts, but we just weren't playing that way at that time. Was able to show it off a little his senior year, and part of that was both he and staff knew he'd need to show it to have any shot at NBA.
User avatar
CrimsonNBlue
Posts: 17405
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by CrimsonNBlue »

ousdahl wrote: Thu Oct 14, 2021 9:47 am Yeah, prob not.

Unless…

For that matter what did Och have to gain by coming back? Show he can be a more consistent shooter plus get to the rim more?

How does that not apply to Garrett too?

But yeah I do agree Garrett prob did max out the development he stood to gain in college, and prob had more to loose by returning
Och has still only had 1 full season, and was told he could work his way into the 1st round if he gets stronger and attacks off the dribble. It was also his first NBA combine, which is crazy to think about.

The film's out there on Garrett, he's never going to develop the shot, and he basically struck while the iron is hot getting to be a bit player at the end of an NBA bench. If Garrett hasn't achieved 100% of his potential then he is damn near close.

Plus, NIL changes the calculation.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by ousdahl »

CrimsonNBlue wrote: Thu Oct 14, 2021 9:49 am This goes to the game changing in the few years after the twins left, but I think Perry would have also benefitted (at KU) by being a couple years younger and getting an older version of Bill Self.

Perry always had the ability to shoot 40%+ from 3 on 100 attempts, but we just weren't playing that way at that time. Was able to show it off a little his senior year, and part of that was both he and staff knew he'd need to show it to have any shot at NBA.
Yeah, I wonder how Perry would have looked within our more contemporary 4-out sets.

at the same time, I seem to remember him playing as some sorta outside-in combo forward as much as a traditional PF?

He was def more of a SF/PF type than a PF/C type.
User avatar
CrimsonNBlue
Posts: 17405
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by CrimsonNBlue »

ousdahl wrote: Thu Oct 14, 2021 9:59 am
CrimsonNBlue wrote: Thu Oct 14, 2021 9:49 am This goes to the game changing in the few years after the twins left, but I think Perry would have also benefitted (at KU) by being a couple years younger and getting an older version of Bill Self.

Perry always had the ability to shoot 40%+ from 3 on 100 attempts, but we just weren't playing that way at that time. Was able to show it off a little his senior year, and part of that was both he and staff knew he'd need to show it to have any shot at NBA.
Yeah, I wonder how Perry would have looked within our more contemporary 4-out sets.

at the same time, I seem to remember him playing as some sorta outside-in combo forward as much as a traditional PF?

He was def more of a SF/PF type than a PF/C type.
The idea was to get him to about the FT line so he could face the basket and work his man off the dribble--he was quite good at getting the angle, which he needed to because of his lack of standing reach and his game being 99% below the rim.

But, especially in his first 3 seasons, those were all 2 big sets starting towards the baseline. He was very much a PF at this level--we were not running the 4 out stuff like we did after he left with, particularly, Josh Jackson and Jalen Wilson.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by ousdahl »

Right on.

I think I got shit for saying this recently, but I think Jalen will end up being a better player than Perry.

I mean shit, Jalen just declared after his freshman year. The mere fact he has that “I’m a pro” mentality suggests much more potential.
User avatar
hasbeen
Posts: 645
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2018 9:59 pm

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by hasbeen »

I was not a fan of watching Perry Ellis play basketball
"So, which one of these topics are conspiracy?

1 .911 was done by Israel: okay, if you think that one is conspiracy, I'll just leave that one alone."

- lobser
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by ousdahl »

Heck, Perry Ellis wasn’t a fan of watching Perry Ellis play basketball.
User avatar
MICHHAWK
Posts: 5955
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2018 10:01 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by MICHHAWK »

i am a PE fan.
User avatar
CrimsonNBlue
Posts: 17405
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by CrimsonNBlue »

hasbeen wrote: Thu Oct 14, 2021 10:13 am I was not a fan of watching Perry Ellis play basketball
I still think 2015 team (post Cliff-dive) is worse than the (healthy) 2021 team.

Just painful to watch. Perry shooting FT's was the best case scenario. And he shot a ton of them in both 2015 and 16--probably more than anyone named Marcus Morris, and over a 2 year period, probably the most by any Self guy not named Marcus.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by ousdahl »

2015, ugh.

Cliff got cancelled, Selden didn’t improve one bit since freshman year, and we were getting blown out - not only to the UK farm team, but also like at Temple and shit.

Then loosing double digits in the tournament to fuckin Marty Frankamp.

Ugh ugh ugh.
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 34928
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by pdub »

I'm assuming you mean more than any big in 2 years?
Mason ( 16-17 ) 422 FTA.

Simien 380.
Marcus 365.
Ellis 340.
User avatar
CrimsonNBlue
Posts: 17405
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by CrimsonNBlue »

Yeah, I'm sure Frank was easily in the 200's in 2017. Devonte probably in the 200's in 2018 as well.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by ousdahl »

The other day I was thinking what a miracle that 09 team was.

Any other season, if you were told we’d win the conference and make the sweet 16 with no returning starters, just two reserves with a bunch of freshman and Face Ass, you’d think we were cray.
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 34928
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: 21-22 lineup

Post by pdub »

That season was like going to Vegas, playing for three days straight, winning every day, and the last night there, you put all your winnings on red and hit.

Then, the next morning, all hungover, waiting for the car to come pick you up to take you to the airport, you fuck around on a dollar slot machine and win a thousand bucks.
Post Reply