Jayhawks making $$$
-
Deleted User 863
-
Deleted User 887
Re: Jayhawks making $$$
I'm shocked there isn't a KU football program correlation to 1 800 Got Junk.
Re: Jayhawks making $$$
where’s gutter when you need him?
Not not gutter, but indeed gutter.
The gutter who would enthusiastically label the world around him as:
JUNK!!!!
Not not gutter, but indeed gutter.
The gutter who would enthusiastically label the world around him as:
JUNK!!!!
Re: Jayhawks making $$$
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-baske ... dealership
this is just..yuck....we're not going to agree on this.....
Wonder if this had anything to do with him not being a Jayhawk
this is just..yuck....we're not going to agree on this.....
Wonder if this had anything to do with him not being a Jayhawk
Just Ledoux it
Re: Jayhawks making $$$
Hoping TyTy is a better driver than UK’s last one and done.
Re: Jayhawks making $$$
Awful.TDub wrote: ↑Thu Oct 21, 2021 9:12 am https://www.espn.com/mens-college-baske ... dealership
this is just..yuck....we're not going to agree on this.....
Wonder if this had anything to do with him not being a Jayhawk
I think I got about two to three more years left in me.
"At his team's media day Wednesday, coach John Calipari said players are not coming to Kentucky for NIL opportunities, but he also added that his team has taken advantage of them.
"They don't come here because of name, image and likeness, but let me say this: To this point, our players have the most [NIL] transactions on our campus, and there is only really 10 of them taking advantage, and they have the most transactions on this campus," he said. "They are benefiting [from] this."
-
CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: Jayhawks making $$$
Reminds me of when Kietzman tried to blow the whistle on KU because Tyshawn had bought Scott Pollard's car--only to find out it was like a 10 year old Chevy SUV.
Re: Jayhawks making $$$
The allergic reaction you have to the notion of people getting paid for the value they generate remains profoundly weird to me, someone who doesn't have a problem with the notion of people getting paid for the value they generate.pdub wrote: ↑Thu Oct 21, 2021 9:32 amAwful.TDub wrote: ↑Thu Oct 21, 2021 9:12 am https://www.espn.com/mens-college-baske ... dealership
this is just..yuck....we're not going to agree on this.....
Wonder if this had anything to do with him not being a Jayhawk
I think I got about two to three more years left in me.
"At his team's media day Wednesday, coach John Calipari said players are not coming to Kentucky for NIL opportunities, but he also added that his team has taken advantage of them.
"They don't come here because of name, image and likeness, but let me say this: To this point, our players have the most [NIL] transactions on our campus, and there is only really 10 of them taking advantage, and they have the most transactions on this campus," he said. "They are benefiting [from] this."
Re: Jayhawks making $$$
i remember when collegiate athletics was awesome. so at least i have that.
Re: Jayhawks making $$$
You just seem to have a problem understanding other people's opinions and perspectives if they differ than yours JFish.
I understand yours.
I understand yours.
Re: Jayhawks making $$$
A better answer here is,
"It's inevitable that amateur athletics becomes professional as we live in a society that regards the dollar bill over all other things so unfortunately, pdub, you'll just have to accept this. That doesn't mean you have to like it however."
That's a good answer JFish.
Try that one.
"It's inevitable that amateur athletics becomes professional as we live in a society that regards the dollar bill over all other things so unfortunately, pdub, you'll just have to accept this. That doesn't mean you have to like it however."
That's a good answer JFish.
Try that one.
Re: Jayhawks making $$$
Trying to find some space between whether we can somehow not have to regard the dollar bill over all things AND let people get paid for the value they generate
It seems two valid observations, and seems they don’t necessarily have to be mutually exclusive.
It seems two valid observations, and seems they don’t necessarily have to be mutually exclusive.
Re: Jayhawks making $$$
On one hand there’s this argument for some sort of aesthetic beauty of it or whatever. Who needs money involved when we can all play basketball for the love of the game!
On the other hand, other posters have told me on the pols bored that humans can’t be expected to do a single thing in this world unless there’s some monetary incentive. Why would anyone play basketball unless they’re getting paid?
On the other hand, other posters have told me on the pols bored that humans can’t be expected to do a single thing in this world unless there’s some monetary incentive. Why would anyone play basketball unless they’re getting paid?
-
CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: Jayhawks making $$$
The money's already there. Always has been.ousdahl wrote: ↑Thu Oct 21, 2021 10:23 am On one hand there’s this argument for some sort of aesthetic beauty of it or whatever. Who needs money involved when we can all play basketball for the love of the game!
On the other hand, other posters have told me on the pols bored that humans can’t be expected to do a single thing in this world unless there’s some monetary incentive. Why would anyone play basketball unless they’re getting paid?