SCOTUS

[Cascadia]

i guess i shouldn’t be surprised, but it’s amazing how easy it is for someone to double down on their ignorant take in the face of indisputable contradictory evidence

It’s astonishing and a detriment to our society.

[twocoach]

i could walk into the mall right now, ask 10 people to share their thoughts on abortion. 8 of 10 would tell me they don't have any. they don't care. they are on their way to see santa, buy presents, and make gingerbread houses with their children.

1 person would go loony right. 1 person would go loony left. proof positive. case closed.

Nine of the 10 would simply tell you anything to get away from the loon asking them about abortion at the mall.

[jfish26]

I like how mich seems to think the world exists in in a Norman Rockwell painting or something.

Fixed.

[RainbowsandUnicorns]

abortion is a fringe issue. most don't give it much thought. most don't vote one way or the other because of it.

Ok, but enough may to make difference/s between who is elected and who isn't. Right?

[ousdahl]

I like how mich seems to think the world exists in in a Norman Rockwell painting or something.

Fixed.

Well, it’s Mich’s world.

If it’s further than 3 inches from his own nose, it don’t exist.

(Btw Mich, your nose has frosting on it, prob from the gingerbread house)

[RainbowsandUnicorns]

no one outside of the fringe right and the fringe left give abortion much thought at all.

this board focuses mostly on stuff that is for the fringes. that's what internet whackjobs do.

I have no malice towards you in asking you these 3 questions and I'm truly interested in your answers.

1. Forgetting on here. Do you feel a few/some/many/most/or all people who feel strongly about something and express it on the internet are "internet whack jobs"?

2. Of the following 3 things, what are you most fearful of?
a) Getting shot by someone with a gun.
b) Getting the fungus and having to be hospitalized because of it.
c) Assuming you're neither and you're a home owner, having Muslim and/or Black neighbors move in next door and directly across the street from you.

3. Have you ever used the word/s pro-abortion to describe someone that is "pro-choice"?

[Deleted User 89]

this oughta be good

(actually, never mind…you’re highly unlikely to get honest answers, if you get any answers at all)

[jhawks99]

Mich don't answer no questions.

[sdoyel]

I like how mich seems to think the world exists in in a Norman Rockwell painting or something.

Fixed.

Echoes Japhys post a few days ago.

[Leawood]

As an older person, I can’t help thinking that the demonstrators advancing “women’s health care” including abortion services will never need abortion services.

[Deleted User 863]

this board focuses mostly on stuff that is for the fringes. that's what internet whackjobs do.

For all the "owning the libs" talk that goes on here, it's quite ironic that this portion of the board is dedicated solely to "owning the pubs".

[Deleted User 89]

this board focuses mostly on stuff that is for the fringes. that's what internet whackjobs do.

For all the "owning the libs" talk that goes on here, it's quite ironic that this portion of the board is dedicated solely to "owning the pubs".

how so?

wanting the SCOTUS to uphold a half a century precedence is owning the pubs?

[Cascadia]

Illy trying to swim in deep end again should be fun.

[Deleted User 863]

this board focuses mostly on stuff that is for the fringes. that's what internet whackjobs do.

For all the "owning the libs" talk that goes on here, it's quite ironic that this portion of the board is dedicated solely to "owning the pubs".

how so?

wanting the SCOTUS to uphold a half a century precedence is owning the pubs?

I didn't say this thread specifically. But a handful of you spend the majority of your time at kansascrimson.com attempting to "own the pubs" even though there are probably only 2 or 3 that even post/read this messageboard regularly.

[Deleted User 89]

For all the "owning the libs" talk that goes on here, it's quite ironic that this portion of the board is dedicated solely to "owning the pubs".

how so?

wanting the SCOTUS to uphold a half a century precedence is owning the pubs?

I didn't say this thread specifically. But a handful of you spend the majority of your time at kansascrimson.com attempting to "own the pubs" even though there are probably only 2 or 3 that even post/read this messageboard regularly.

ok

lol

[Overlander]

Illy trying to swim in deep end again should be fun.

[Overlander]

For all the "owning the libs" talk that goes on here, it's quite ironic that this portion of the board is dedicated solely to "owning the pubs".

how so?

wanting the SCOTUS to uphold a half a century precedence is owning the pubs?

I didn't say this thread specifically. But a handful of you spend the majority of your time at kansascrimson.com attempting to "own the pubs" even though there are probably only 2 or 3 that even post/read this messageboard regularly.

With a board this lowly populated. 3 douchebags is still a fairly high number

[zsn]

Pubs own themselves enough on their own, especially as they try to own the libs. So, it can’t be that hard.

[Deleted User 89]

if calling out the ignorant takes of people on this board = owning the pubs, then i guess i’m guilty as charged

[Cascadia]

The trash and evil rulings begin. Dems either need to increase the seats or we hope justices die young.

Sorry ladies, white male amercians fucking suck.