Violence

[sdoyel]

[ousdahl]

[sdoyel]

[sdoyel]

[ousdahl]

"But they have to show he had some kind of role as opposed to: He sees it happen, sits back and enjoys it, but doesn't do anything. They have to show that he played some role in causing it, not that the riot went out of control and he just gleefully watched it happen,"

So what would constitute “play some role in causing it?”

And isn’t the Trump team doggedly fighting the release of the evidence that might suggest that?

[JKLivin]

To be fair, it was killing two people who were trying to kill him.

[Overlander]

To be fair, it was killing two people who were trying to kill him.

Keep telling yourself that

[JKLivin]

To be fair, it was killing two people who were trying to kill him.

Keep telling yourself that

Meh. It's what a jury of his peers in a court of law decided. That's what matters. Deal with it.

[Cascadia]

To be fair, it was killing two people who were trying to kill him.

Keep telling yourself that

Meh. It's what a jury of his peers in a court of law decided. That's what matters. Deal with it.

Two people are dead. That's what matters.

But, you're a piece of shit, so...........

[Overlander]

Keep telling yourself that

Meh. It's what a jury of his peers in a court of law decided. That's what matters. Deal with it.

Two people are dead. That's what matters.

But, you're a piece of shit, so...........

Psych (and his type) are ready to call this maggot a hero because he actually got to do something that they, deep inside, wish they could get away with

[Mjl]

To be fair, it was killing two people who were trying to kill him.

Keep telling yourself that

Meh. It's what a jury of his peers in a court of law decided. That's what matters. Deal with it.

It's literally not

[Overlander]

Shhhhh, Psych still believes Trump when he tells everyone he was “cleared of any wrongdoing”

[JKLivin]

Keep telling yourself that

Meh. It's what a jury of his peers in a court of law decided. That's what matters. Deal with it.

Two people are dead. That's what matters.

But, you're a piece of shit, so...........

When you try to kill another person, you open the door to the possibility that they will kill you to keep you from killing them. Not sure why that’s so hard to understand.

[RainbowsandUnicorns]

Meh. It's what a jury of his peers in a court of law decided. That's what matters. Deal with it.

Two people are dead. That's what matters.

But, you're a piece of shit, so...........

When you try to kill another person, you open the door to the possibility that they will kill you to keep you from killing them. Not sure why that’s so hard to understand.

Who tried to kill him?

[JKLivin]

Two people are dead. That's what matters.

But, you're a piece of shit, so...........

When you try to kill another person, you open the door to the possibility that they will kill you to keep you from killing them. Not sure why that’s so hard to understand.

Who tried to kill him?

The deceased.

[RainbowsandUnicorns]

When you try to kill another person, you open the door to the possibility that they will kill you to keep you from killing them. Not sure why that’s so hard to understand.

Who tried to kill him?

The deceased.

They did? You sure about that? I could be wrong but I don't believe that was said in court in regards to Rosenbaum. Maybe it was?
AS far as Huber, he MAY have tried to kill Rittenhouse AFTER Rittenhouse shot someone but we didn't get to hear his side of the story in court. Did we?
Perhaps Huber felt if he didn't stop Rittenhouse he may have shot other people - who were or were NOT "trying to kill him". The FACT is we will never know.

[JKLivin]

Who tried to kill him?

The deceased.

They did? You sure about that? I could be wrong but I don't believe that was said in court in regards to Rosenbaum. Maybe it was?
AS far as Huber, he MAY have tried to kill Rittenhouse AFTER Rittenhouse shot someone but we didn't get to hear his side of the story in court. Did we?
Perhaps Huber felt if he didn't stop Rittenhouse he may have shot other people - who were or were NOT "trying to kill him". The FACT is we will never know.

If you chase me and hit me in the head with a skateboard, I will assume that you are trying to kill me. If you run at me with a handgun drawn and pointed at me, I will assume you are trying to kill me.

[RainbowsandUnicorns]

The deceased.

They did? You sure about that? I could be wrong but I don't believe that was said in court in regards to Rosenbaum. Maybe it was?
AS far as Huber, he MAY have tried to kill Rittenhouse AFTER Rittenhouse shot someone but we didn't get to hear his side of the story in court. Did we?
Perhaps Huber felt if he didn't stop Rittenhouse he may have shot other people - who were or were NOT "trying to kill him". The FACT is we will never know.

If you chase me and hit me in the head with a skateboard, I will assume that you are trying to kill me. If you run at me with a handgun drawn and pointed at me, I will assume you are trying to kill me.

So you're saying Rosenbaum ran at Rittenhouse with a handgun drawn and pointed at Rittenhouse?

[JKLivin]

The deceased.

They did? You sure about that? I could be wrong but I don't believe that was said in court in regards to Rosenbaum. Maybe it was?
AS far as Huber, he MAY have tried to kill Rittenhouse AFTER Rittenhouse shot someone but we didn't get to hear his side of the story in court. Did we?
Perhaps Huber felt if he didn't stop Rittenhouse he may have shot other people - who were or were NOT "trying to kill him". The FACT is we will never know.

If you chase me and hit me in the head with a skateboard, I will assume that you are trying to kill me. If you run at me with a handgun drawn and pointed at me, I will assume you are trying to kill me.

No. Grosskreutz did.

[RainbowsandUnicorns]

They did? You sure about that? I could be wrong but I don't believe that was said in court in regards to Rosenbaum. Maybe it was?
AS far as Huber, he MAY have tried to kill Rittenhouse AFTER Rittenhouse shot someone but we didn't get to hear his side of the story in court. Did we?
Perhaps Huber felt if he didn't stop Rittenhouse he may have shot other people - who were or were NOT "trying to kill him". The FACT is we will never know.

If you chase me and hit me in the head with a skateboard, I will assume that you are trying to kill me. If you run at me with a handgun drawn and pointed at me, I will assume you are trying to kill me.

No. Grosskreutz did.

Ok, but in one of your previous posts you stated it was the "deceased" who tried to kill him. Grosskreutz is NOT deceased.
Rosenbaum is deceased but even Rittenhouse couldn't prove that Rosenbaum "tried to kill him".
Now tell us why you feel Huber wasn't acting in self defense and why it was OK for Rittenhouse to shoot and kill Huber but not ok for Huber to try and "kill" Rittenhouse.
I'm trying to think of a respectful way to say this. I'll simply say our exchange has pretty much proven your ignorance on the subject.