Violence

Ugh.
User avatar
Cascadia
Posts: 6677
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:15 am

Re: Violence

Post by Cascadia »

RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: Thu Dec 23, 2021 7:39 am
JKLivin wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 9:07 pm
JKLivin wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 7:17 pm

If you chase me and hit me in the head with a skateboard, I will assume that you are trying to kill me. If you run at me with a handgun drawn and pointed at me, I will assume you are trying to kill me.
No. Grosskreutz did.
Ok, but in one of your previous posts you stated it was the "deceased" who tried to kill him. Grosskreutz is NOT deceased.
Rosenbaum is deceased but even Rittenhouse couldn't prove that Rosenbaum "tried to kill him".
Now tell us why you feel Huber wasn't acting in self defense and why it was OK for Rittenhouse to shoot and kill Huber but not ok for Huber to try and "kill" Rittenhouse.
I'm trying to think of a respectful way to say this. I'll simply say our exchange has pretty much proven your ignorance on the subject.


Overlander wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 2:51 pm Psych (and his type) are ready to call this maggot a hero because he actually got to do something that they, deep inside, wish they could get away with
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 21086
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: Violence

Post by twocoach »

JKLivin wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 7:17 pm
RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 6:58 pm
JKLivin wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 5:42 pm

The deceased.
They did? You sure about that? I could be wrong but I don't believe that was said in court in regards to Rosenbaum. Maybe it was?
AS far as Huber, he MAY have tried to kill Rittenhouse AFTER Rittenhouse shot someone but we didn't get to hear his side of the story in court. Did we?
Perhaps Huber felt if he didn't stop Rittenhouse he may have shot other people - who were or were NOT "trying to kill him". The FACT is we will never know.
If you chase me and hit me in the head with a skateboard, I will assume that you are trying to kill me. If you run at me with a handgun drawn and pointed at me, I will assume you are trying to kill me.
If you are running from the scene of just shooting someone in the back, you might want to consider that that has something to do with why others are chasing you and trying to stop you. Do what you feel everyone who gets killed by a law enforcement should do and just stop being confrontational, do not resist efforts to detain you, put any weapon you are in possession of on the ground and comply.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Violence

Post by ousdahl »

I know psych already has his mind made up, but it’s wild that the duty is not on folks to refrain from bringing assault rifles to a protest; but on everyone else to not rub the guy with the assault rifle the wrong way.
User avatar
JKLivin
Contributor
Posts: 3379
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 10:28 am

Re: Violence

Post by JKLivin »

ousdahl wrote: Thu Dec 23, 2021 11:17 am I know psych already has his mind made up, but it’s wild that the duty is not on folks to refrain from bringing assault rifles to a protest; but on everyone else to not rub the guy with the assault rifle the wrong way.
Perhaps the duty is on those protesting to do so without looting, burning, destroying property, and making others feel unsafe. Once you start doing that, you invite people showing up with assault rifles. It's pretty simple.
“I wouldn’t sleep with your wife because she would fall in love and your black little heart would be crushed again. And 100% I could beat your ass.” - Overlander
User avatar
JKLivin
Contributor
Posts: 3379
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 10:28 am

Re: Violence

Post by JKLivin »

twocoach wrote: Thu Dec 23, 2021 11:13 am
JKLivin wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 7:17 pm
RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 6:58 pm

They did? You sure about that? I could be wrong but I don't believe that was said in court in regards to Rosenbaum. Maybe it was?
AS far as Huber, he MAY have tried to kill Rittenhouse AFTER Rittenhouse shot someone but we didn't get to hear his side of the story in court. Did we?
Perhaps Huber felt if he didn't stop Rittenhouse he may have shot other people - who were or were NOT "trying to kill him". The FACT is we will never know.
If you chase me and hit me in the head with a skateboard, I will assume that you are trying to kill me. If you run at me with a handgun drawn and pointed at me, I will assume you are trying to kill me.
If you are running from the scene of just shooting someone in the back, you might want to consider that that has something to do with why others are chasing you and trying to stop you. Do what you feel everyone who gets killed by a law enforcement should do and just stop being confrontational, do not resist efforts to detain you, put any weapon you are in possession of on the ground and comply.
I think when people are yelling threats and urging each other to crush your skull, you may feel the need to defend yourself.

When they go so far as to hit you with large, hard objects in the head, you may feel the need to defend yourself.

When they have been following you around letting you know that they are going to harm you bodily, you may feel the need to defend yourself.

When someone runs at you with a handgun and is pointing it at you, you may feel the need to defend yourself.
“I wouldn’t sleep with your wife because she would fall in love and your black little heart would be crushed again. And 100% I could beat your ass.” - Overlander
User avatar
Mjl
Posts: 6272
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:24 am

Re: Violence

Post by Mjl »

Girls who wear skimpy clothes deserve to be raped - that's basically what you're saying, right?
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Violence

Post by ousdahl »

If you’re concerned about making others feel unsafe, why are you cool with letting kids run around playing with assault rifles?

And do you really think property is more valuable than human lives?

And this response is telling: “you invite people showing up with assault rifles.” You almost make it sound like Kyle went there looking for trouble.
Overlander
Contributor
Posts: 6193
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2021 7:12 pm

Re: Violence

Post by Overlander »

JKLivin wrote: Thu Dec 23, 2021 11:43 am
ousdahl wrote: Thu Dec 23, 2021 11:17 am I know psych already has his mind made up, but it’s wild that the duty is not on folks to refrain from bringing assault rifles to a protest; but on everyone else to not rub the guy with the assault rifle the wrong way.
Perhaps the duty is on those protesting to do so without looting, burning, destroying property, and making others feel unsafe. Once you start doing that, you invite people showing up with assault rifles. It's pretty simple.
So, the cop that shot the female protester at the Capital was a hero too?
“By way of contrast, I'm not the one who feels the need to respond to every post someone else makes”
Psych- Every Single Time
User avatar
JKLivin
Contributor
Posts: 3379
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 10:28 am

Re: Violence

Post by JKLivin »

ousdahl wrote: Thu Dec 23, 2021 11:48 am If you’re concerned about making others feel unsafe, why are you cool with letting kids run around playing with assault rifles?

And do you really think property is more valuable than human lives?

And this response is telling: “you invite people showing up with assault rifles.” You almost make it sound like Kyle went there looking for trouble.
You keep creating a false dichotomy with your human lives vs. private property question. Both are important, and neither should be endangered. The only people who don't care about property being destroyed are those who either a) own nothing of value and/or b) are not the owners of the property being destroyed.

He went there to defend property which should not have been under threat in the first place. Being upset and outraged is not justification for wanton destruction of property that does not belong to you.
“I wouldn’t sleep with your wife because she would fall in love and your black little heart would be crushed again. And 100% I could beat your ass.” - Overlander
User avatar
JKLivin
Contributor
Posts: 3379
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 10:28 am

Re: Violence

Post by JKLivin »

Mjl wrote: Thu Dec 23, 2021 11:47 am Girls who wear skimpy clothes deserve to be raped - that's basically what you're saying, right?
Are you being purposely ridiculous? Serious question.
“I wouldn’t sleep with your wife because she would fall in love and your black little heart would be crushed again. And 100% I could beat your ass.” - Overlander
Overlander
Contributor
Posts: 6193
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2021 7:12 pm

Re: Violence

Post by Overlander »

JKLivin wrote: Thu Dec 23, 2021 12:00 pm
ousdahl wrote: Thu Dec 23, 2021 11:48 am If you’re concerned about making others feel unsafe, why are you cool with letting kids run around playing with assault rifles?

And do you really think property is more valuable than human lives?

And this response is telling: “you invite people showing up with assault rifles.” You almost make it sound like Kyle went there looking for trouble.

He went there to defend property which should not have been under threat in the first place.
THIS IS THE BIGGEST PART OF THE ENTIRE SCENARIO.

Sorry you are too stupid to understand it
“By way of contrast, I'm not the one who feels the need to respond to every post someone else makes”
Psych- Every Single Time
User avatar
jhawks99
Contributor
Posts: 17477
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:34 am
Location: Woodbury, MN

Re: Violence

Post by jhawks99 »

Seems that psych is all about vigilante justice. Whoo Hooo pew pew pew. Let's all play John Wayne. Go where we're not wanted or needed and start shootin the place up.
Defense. Rebounds.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Violence

Post by ousdahl »

Heaven forbid if psych’s kid got shot by Kyle, I kinda doubt psych would shrug it off like meh he had it coming because property.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Violence

Post by ousdahl »

What about the civil suits? What’s pending?

Is there a statue of limitations?

I kinda wonder if attorneys are waiting for the irresistible shiny luster of Kyle to wear off among conservatives, so he doesn’t enjoy the benefit of a buncha random magaheads footing the bill again for the damage he did.
User avatar
jhawks99
Contributor
Posts: 17477
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:34 am
Location: Woodbury, MN

Re: Violence

Post by jhawks99 »

I love statues of limitations.
Defense. Rebounds.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Violence

Post by ousdahl »

Wait, I thought this was the kenosha thread?

Take the Kyle talk there.

Cuz this thread is its own wild ride

RainbowsandUnicorns
Contributor
Posts: 12521
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am

Re: Violence

Post by RainbowsandUnicorns »

JKLivin wrote: Thu Dec 23, 2021 11:45 am
twocoach wrote: Thu Dec 23, 2021 11:13 am
JKLivin wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 7:17 pm

If you chase me and hit me in the head with a skateboard, I will assume that you are trying to kill me. If you run at me with a handgun drawn and pointed at me, I will assume you are trying to kill me.
If you are running from the scene of just shooting someone in the back, you might want to consider that that has something to do with why others are chasing you and trying to stop you. Do what you feel everyone who gets killed by a law enforcement should do and just stop being confrontational, do not resist efforts to detain you, put any weapon you are in possession of on the ground and comply.
I think when people are yelling threats and urging each other to crush your skull, you may feel the need to defend yourself.

When they go so far as to hit you with large, hard objects in the head, you may feel the need to defend yourself.

When they have been following you around letting you know that they are going to harm you bodily, you may feel the need to defend yourself.

When someone runs at you with a handgun and is pointing it at you, you may feel the need to defend yourself.
I don't know if it's a fact that people yelled for Rittenhouse's skull to be crushed but I am confident the people who would have wanted Rittenhouse's skull to be crushed (AFTER he shot someone) very well may have felt their lives were potentially in danger. I probably would have yelled the same thing and my guess is you would have too if you were in the same exact situation and had witnessed Rittenhouse shooting someone.
Gutter wrote: Fri Nov 8th 2:16pm
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Violence

Post by ousdahl »

User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 21086
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: Violence

Post by twocoach »

JKLivin wrote: Thu Dec 23, 2021 12:00 pm
ousdahl wrote: Thu Dec 23, 2021 11:48 am If you’re concerned about making others feel unsafe, why are you cool with letting kids run around playing with assault rifles?

And do you really think property is more valuable than human lives?

And this response is telling: “you invite people showing up with assault rifles.” You almost make it sound like Kyle went there looking for trouble.
You keep creating a false dichotomy with your human lives vs. private property question. Both are important, and neither should be endangered. The only people who don't care about property being destroyed are those who either a) own nothing of value and/or b) are not the owners of the property being destroyed.

He went there to defend property which should not have been under threat in the first place. Being upset and outraged is not justification for wanton destruction of property that does not belong to you.
He didn't go there to defend any property. Just stop with that nonsense.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Violence

Post by ousdahl »

Just imagine if a judge DID allow that video from a couple weeks prior of Kyle saying he wishes he could shoot protestors
Post Reply