It's Game Day, Ladies and Gentlemen
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: It's Game Day, Ladies and Gentlemen
Playing Clemence and Adams 12 minutes in a close conference road game is going away from Mitch. Jalen also saw run at the 5 in both games.
Jalen did see run at the 5 against George Mason (and we looked good), but generally those are things that you wouldn't have expected to see given the couple of weeks prior to conference play when all the attention was on Mitch taking Dave's minutes.
Jalen did see run at the 5 against George Mason (and we looked good), but generally those are things that you wouldn't have expected to see given the couple of weeks prior to conference play when all the attention was on Mitch taking Dave's minutes.
- NewtonHawk11
- Posts: 12826
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:48 am
- Location: Kansas
Re: It's Game Day, Ladies and Gentlemen
In honor of Roy coming to AFH tonight.
“I don’t remember anything he said, but it was a very memorable speech.” Julian Wright on a speech Michael Jordan gave to a group he was in
"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
Re: It's Game Day, Ladies and Gentlemen
4min of Jalen at the 5 against TT and the last 2 were desperation minutes where we played no bigs.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Tue Jan 11, 2022 10:23 am Playing Clemence and Adams 12 minutes in a close conference road game is going away from Mitch. Jalen also saw run at the 5 in both games.
Jalen did see run at the 5 against George Mason (and we looked good), but generally those are things that you wouldn't have expected to see given the couple of weeks prior to conference play when all the attention was on Mitch taking Dave's minutes.
Jalen is awful at the 5. We give up way too much inside. He's a wing.
KJ and Clemence average about 10min combined this season. So it wasn't totally out of whack. Just was in a closer game than usual.
Last edited by Deleted User 863 on Tue Jan 11, 2022 10:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: It's Game Day, Ladies and Gentlemen
KU -12
ISU is a fraud.
ISU is a fraud.
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: It's Game Day, Ladies and Gentlemen
Mitch is awful at the 5. We give up way too much inside. He’s a 1990’s 4.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Tue Jan 11, 2022 10:35 am4min of Jalen at the 5 against TT and the last 2 were desperation minutes where we played no bigs.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Tue Jan 11, 2022 10:23 am Playing Clemence and Adams 12 minutes in a close conference road game is going away from Mitch. Jalen also saw run at the 5 in both games.
Jalen did see run at the 5 against George Mason (and we looked good), but generally those are things that you wouldn't have expected to see given the couple of weeks prior to conference play when all the attention was on Mitch taking Dave's minutes.
Jalen is awful at the 5. We give up way too much inside. He's a wing.
Re: It's Game Day, Ladies and Gentlemen
Yeah, the only reason wings are getting desperation minutes at the 5 is cuz of how bad our veteran bigs are in the first place
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: It's Game Day, Ladies and Gentlemen
In 2022, I'd prefer rolling with a big wing with borderline NBA talent for backup 5 minutes over a guy that is suited for a 1990's PF position that doesn't exist and has Division II talent. Especially when they are essentially the same size. That's the direction most coaches are going for several years now.
Re: It's Game Day, Ladies and Gentlemen
Think of it this way: even if a wing is bad at the 5 it still gets your team the benefit of doing wing things out there.
If your 5 is bad at the 5 then all you’ve got out there is a bad 5.
If your 5 is bad at the 5 then all you’ve got out there is a bad 5.
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: It's Game Day, Ladies and Gentlemen
We're in some way picking the lesser of two evils. Ideally, Dave gives us pretty close to 30. If we had a Tarik Black here, then the answer would be pretty obvious.
In the days of perimeter oriented basketball/bigs, go with some combination of Wilson, freshmen, and sure, then Mitch. It doesn't make much sense to me to just let superior talent waste away on the bench when we know what Mitch brings and know that it's not good enough. And it's Bill's job to get them ready--don't look back on the season and wish you tried something different from the past 5 seasons.
In the days of perimeter oriented basketball/bigs, go with some combination of Wilson, freshmen, and sure, then Mitch. It doesn't make much sense to me to just let superior talent waste away on the bench when we know what Mitch brings and know that it's not good enough. And it's Bill's job to get them ready--don't look back on the season and wish you tried something different from the past 5 seasons.
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: It's Game Day, Ladies and Gentlemen
To Bill's credit, we did go with Clemence, Adams, and even Jalen instead of Mitch in what will be about the toughest environment we will see all season.
Re: It's Game Day, Ladies and Gentlemen
Obvious in the sense he’d have 2 fouls by the first media timeout?CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Tue Jan 11, 2022 11:14 am We're in some way picking the lesser of two evils. Ideally, Dave gives us pretty close to 30. If we had a Tarik Black here, then the answer would be pretty obvious.
Re: It's Game Day, Ladies and Gentlemen
And another factor in the equation:
It may be easier to justify playing a wing at the 5 when said wing is also your best rebounder.
It may be easier to justify playing a wing at the 5 when said wing is also your best rebounder.
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: It's Game Day, Ladies and Gentlemen
Yeah, defensive rebounding is a huge part of the equation and Mitch isn't even in the same stratosphere as Jalen there.
Size also matters. Those two factors are why, for instance, we wouldn't want Svi at the 5 despite his height. And then CB might be the second best defensive rebounder on the team, pound for pound, but was well overmatched at the 5 last season. Jalen held things down last season at the 5 during COVID times, so not sure why it seems like such a novel idea this season.
Size also matters. Those two factors are why, for instance, we wouldn't want Svi at the 5 despite his height. And then CB might be the second best defensive rebounder on the team, pound for pound, but was well overmatched at the 5 last season. Jalen held things down last season at the 5 during COVID times, so not sure why it seems like such a novel idea this season.
-
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:08 am
Re: It's Game Day, Ladies and Gentlemen
Counter that with said wing is so bad at protecting the rim that they allow 50 points in the paint. Can't justify playing your best rebounder out of position, for his rebounding, when there aren't any rebounds to grab.
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13892
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: It's Game Day, Ladies and Gentlemen
i’m trying to remember JW’s limited minutes at the 5
how was he defending? i don’t seem to recall any fronting of his man, which would seem almost a necessity in that situation (so long as there is reliable back-side help)
how was he defending? i don’t seem to recall any fronting of his man, which would seem almost a necessity in that situation (so long as there is reliable back-side help)
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
Re: It's Game Day, Ladies and Gentlemen
Counter that counter with neither non-wing actual listed “big” is particularly good at protecting the rim either.NDballer13 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 11, 2022 11:28 am Counter that with said wing is so bad at protecting the rim that they allow 50 points in the paint. Can't justify playing your best rebounder out of position, for his rebounding, when there aren't any rebounds to grab.
The occasional weak side block is nice, but let’s not pretend Mitch is Jeff Withey.
And Dave is the best at playing strong against a similarly strong legit D1 sized big, but that’s also while crossing fingers and knocking on wood and hoping Dave doesn’t wake up and see his own shadow that day or whatever
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: It's Game Day, Ladies and Gentlemen
This is a decent point, but Mitch is far from a rim protector as a 5 man. His weakside shot blocks just end up in the other team's hands for a lay in. These aren't great options and are way less preferable to Dave giving us good Dave.NDballer13 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 11, 2022 11:28 am Counter that with said wing is so bad at protecting the rim that they allow 50 points in the paint. Can't justify playing your best rebounder out of position, for his rebounding, when there aren't any rebounds to grab.
I think you make up for that during Jalen's minutes at the 5 by pushing tempo and getting a lot of offensive possessions, especially in transition where no one in the country can match us.
Re: It's Game Day, Ladies and Gentlemen
Yea.
Not many teams have a guy who can not only work the glass, but start the fast break too.
Not many teams have a guy who can not only work the glass, but start the fast break too.
-
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:08 am
Re: It's Game Day, Ladies and Gentlemen
I think that only works when Jalen is making shots though. Which he has only done one time all year. If none of your options are particularly good at protecting the rim, give me the guy who will at least be able to fight an opposing team's 5 from just walking down the court, to whatever point in the paint, he wants to be and setting up shop. At least for the majority of the game.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Tue Jan 11, 2022 11:45 amThis is a decent point, but Mitch is far from a rim protector as a 5 man. His weakside shot blocks just end up in the other team's hands for a lay in. These aren't great options and are way less preferable to Dave giving us good Dave.NDballer13 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 11, 2022 11:28 am Counter that with said wing is so bad at protecting the rim that they allow 50 points in the paint. Can't justify playing your best rebounder out of position, for his rebounding, when there aren't any rebounds to grab.
I think you make up for that during Jalen's minutes at the 5 by pushing tempo and getting a lot of offensive possessions, especially in transition where no one in the country can match us.
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: It's Game Day, Ladies and Gentlemen
Majority of the game should be Dave. If the other team has some big monster at the 5, I don't think putting Jalen on him does us favors, sure. Heck, Mitch probably isn't either. That brings us to Adams who is maybe even stronger than Dave . . .NDballer13 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 11, 2022 11:53 amI think that only works when Jalen is making shots though. Which he has only done one time all year. If none of your options are particularly good at protecting the rim, give me the guy who will at least be able to fight an opposing team's 5 from just walking down the court, to whatever point in the paint, he wants to be and setting up shop. At least for the majority of the game.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Tue Jan 11, 2022 11:45 amThis is a decent point, but Mitch is far from a rim protector as a 5 man. His weakside shot blocks just end up in the other team's hands for a lay in. These aren't great options and are way less preferable to Dave giving us good Dave.NDballer13 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 11, 2022 11:28 am Counter that with said wing is so bad at protecting the rim that they allow 50 points in the paint. Can't justify playing your best rebounder out of position, for his rebounding, when there aren't any rebounds to grab.
I think you make up for that during Jalen's minutes at the 5 by pushing tempo and getting a lot of offensive possessions, especially in transition where no one in the country can match us.