Apparently you haven’t spent much time around the “pro-life” types.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Jan 20, 2022 10:08 amMost of us aren't single issue voters.
Would you be on the Jury?
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
If we're going to lean in to a charged hot take, it has been effectively legal for most of modern history.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Jan 20, 2022 8:05 am "Murder is legal for white people now"
LOL
Get a grip. My god, just listen to yourself. You sound so ignorant.
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Us?
viewtopic.php?f=9&t=870&p=240656&hilit=trumpers#p240656
Yes.
But for reals, how long is this temper tantrum going to last?
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
While I don't agree with the federal government making these kind of choices, I can respect/understand a person who feels that way.
The difference here is mocking/degrading an individual who has a different view.
It's why the poli-bored is a trash pile of name calling.
The difference here is mocking/degrading an individual who has a different view.
It's why the poli-bored is a trash pile of name calling.
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
I have enough to know that many of them are nothing like you say they are.ousdahl wrote: ↑Thu Jan 20, 2022 10:09 amApparently you haven’t spent much time around the “pro-life” types.
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
You're just a bat shit crazy anti vaxxing trumperpdub wrote: ↑Thu Jan 20, 2022 10:11 am While I don't agree with the federal government making these kind of choices, I can respect/understand a person who feels that way.
The difference here is mocking/degrading an individual who has a different view.
It's why the poli-bored is a trash pile of name calling.
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
I the same.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Jan 20, 2022 10:12 amI have enough to know that many of them are nothing like you say they are.
My family from upstate New York are pro-life.
They are wonderful people - they just disagree on when life begins.
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
It's not as neatly cut as this, but there seems to be a noticeable day-to-day difference between someone that is pro-life and someone that is single issue voting on pro-life.
The latter have no issue coming up to you at a restaurant to try and hand you bat shit crazy literature.
The latter have no issue coming up to you at a restaurant to try and hand you bat shit crazy literature.
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Right.
If that's your sole reason to choose a candidate(s), then I agree, yer a moran.
If that's your sole reason to choose a candidate(s), then I agree, yer a moran.
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
In the context of this thread, where was the pro-life movement during the BLM protests?
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Oh, so what yer sayin, is the pro-life movement was never actually about life, so much as it is about semantics?
Fully agree.
Fully agree.
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
It is more specifically about abortion.
There are those who are pro-life who are also against police brutality.
It's not that great a leap to take.
There are those who are pro-life who are also against police brutality.
It's not that great a leap to take.
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Your shitty ass pro-life stance isn’t any less shitty because you don’t like police violence.
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
I don't know why we have to pretend there isn't a big overlap between pro-lifers, anti-vaxxers, blue live matters, and people that generally voted for Trump in November 2020.
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Yeah it’s not a leap.
But while they take explicit voting and judicial and legislative and other action against abortion, the police brutality thing gets little more than lip service.
(Not to mention the “pro-lifers” who might knee jerk the “but cops won’t kill you if you just comply” shit, or the “blue lives matter” or “all lives matter” gaslight, with no awareness or irony, and no understanding or appreciation of “pro-life” beyond the context of abortion. But at least they remain united against abortion?)
But while they take explicit voting and judicial and legislative and other action against abortion, the police brutality thing gets little more than lip service.
(Not to mention the “pro-lifers” who might knee jerk the “but cops won’t kill you if you just comply” shit, or the “blue lives matter” or “all lives matter” gaslight, with no awareness or irony, and no understanding or appreciation of “pro-life” beyond the context of abortion. But at least they remain united against abortion?)
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13885
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
reality is uncomfortable for manyCrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Thu Jan 20, 2022 10:39 am I don't know why we have to pretend there isn't a big overlap between pro-lifers, anti-vaxxers, blue live matters, and people that generally voted for Trump in November 2020.
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Is it pro life to cheer and giggle whenever an unvaxxed person dies of covid?
Asking for a friend, because hypocrisy is frowned upon around here...
Asking for a friend, because hypocrisy is frowned upon around here...
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
"I don't know why we have to pretend there isn't a big overlap between pro-lifers, anti-vaxxers, blue live matters, and people that generally voted for Trump in November 2020."
I don't disagree.
But sweeping statements are problematic and are, imo, reasons to be turned off from conversation/debate and political agendas ( political agendas does not have to be a 'bad word' here ).
I don't disagree.
But sweeping statements are problematic and are, imo, reasons to be turned off from conversation/debate and political agendas ( political agendas does not have to be a 'bad word' here ).