Yes, sort of.ousdahl wrote: ↑Fri Jan 21, 2022 9:28 am It’s quite possible that an objective trier of fact would look at all the available evidence and conclude there’s more to suggest we didn’t know what was going on than did.
But the NCAA says, hold my beer and watch this.
Once again bear in mind, the court trial found KU didn’t know they were being defrauded. That’s how fraud works.
The NCAA’s case is basically that KU should have known they were being defrauded anyway.
But, I guess what I'm really trying to say is: why waste any energy on sorting through the "evidence" if evidence doesn't even matter? It's fucked.