Jayhawks in the NBA
Re: Jawhawks in the NBA
and sadly, it’ll prob take us getting our ass kicked for Self to address it.
“Qusdahl ISNT wrong.” - PDub 1/28
“I dont dislike you, even as wildly flailing and uninformed as your theories are” - TDub 2/5
“I dont dislike you, even as wildly flailing and uninformed as your theories are” - TDub 2/5
Re: Jawhawks in the NBA
Sadly, you should go look at their stats. Woof. Tharpe was better at everything offensively. Just had more turnovers. Defense is a subjective thing so arguing it this far beyond Tharpe's playing days is probably pointless. Harris has great defensive moments and awful ones.
Re: Jawhawks in the NBA
Yeah, he does take care of the ball better and generally play with more awareness and control.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 9:23 am I think Harris is better than Tharpe. Not by a ton, but better overall, and it helps that he's on a team that doesn't need him to score.
And while we don’t need him to score, his 5ppg is maybe the lowest of any Self starter ever. (Trying to think who else was that low…Moody? Face Ass?)
And his lack of scoring allows defenses to gamble off him and guard everybody else tighter.
And it’d be one thing if he was some Rondo type dishing dimes left and right to make up for his lack of scoring, but is 2.8 assists a game is, again, almost half what Tharpe did on a short leash.
“Qusdahl ISNT wrong.” - PDub 1/28
“I dont dislike you, even as wildly flailing and uninformed as your theories are” - TDub 2/5
“I dont dislike you, even as wildly flailing and uninformed as your theories are” - TDub 2/5
Re: Jawhawks in the NBA
Tharpe was also on a team that didn't need him to score. That's the difference. His dumb plays didn't always show up on the stats sheet, the same way Juan's hockey assists don't show up on the stat sheet, or half the possesion-saving plays he makes.
Dumb plays are really bad when you're an undertalented point guard with talent around you. Harris is light years better than Naadir for a talented team. But it won't show on the stat sheet.
Dumb plays are really bad when you're an undertalented point guard with talent around you. Harris is light years better than Naadir for a talented team. But it won't show on the stat sheet.
Re: Jawhawks in the NBA
Just looked it up - as a starter even Moody scored more.
And that dood was a roiboi walk-on.
Which is to say, one of my favorite players!
And that dood was a roiboi walk-on.
Which is to say, one of my favorite players!
“Qusdahl ISNT wrong.” - PDub 1/28
“I dont dislike you, even as wildly flailing and uninformed as your theories are” - TDub 2/5
“I dont dislike you, even as wildly flailing and uninformed as your theories are” - TDub 2/5
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: Jawhawks in the NBA
A lot of Harris's good things don't show up in the box score. And, that might both be a credit to and knock on him, IDK.Qusdahl wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 9:30 amYeah, he does take care of the ball better and generally play with more awareness and control.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 9:23 am I think Harris is better than Tharpe. Not by a ton, but better overall, and it helps that he's on a team that doesn't need him to score.
And while we don’t need him to score, his 5ppg is maybe the lowest of any Self starter ever. (Trying to think who else was that low…Moody? Face Ass?)
And his lack of scoring allows defenses to gamble off him and guard everybody else tighter.
And it’d be one thing if he was some Rondo type dishing dimes left and right to make up for his lack of scoring, but is 2.8 assists a game is, again, almost half what Tharpe did on a short leash.
But Harris is loads better in transition and that is this team's key to eliteness. He also does get the ball moving on a team that can sometimes get the ball stuck in the half court. While I do think this board overrates Harris's defense at times, it is definitely better than Tharpe's.
Of course, I have been all aboard the play Remy train, but that's not this particular argument.
Re: Jawhawks in the NBA
How is that a difference? Kansas doesn't need Harris to score either. Tharpe was the 5th leading scorer his junior year; Harris is 6th this year. Their "needs" are pretty identical.Mjl wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 9:31 am Tharpe was also on a team that didn't need him to score. That's the difference. His dumb plays didn't always show up on the stats sheet, the same way Juan's hockey assists don't show up on the stat sheet, or half the possesion-saving plays he makes.
Dumb plays are really bad when you're an undertalented point guard with talent around you. Harris is light years better than Naadir for a talented team. But it won't show on the stat sheet.
To me, the difference is that this is Harris' 2nd year playing that is being compared to Tharpe's 3rd year playing. If this year's Kansas team had next year's version of Harris playing then I think they would be much more consistent and not have as many scoring droughts.
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: Jawhawks in the NBA
We kind of said something similar.Mjl wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 9:31 am Tharpe was also on a team that didn't need him to score. That's the difference. His dumb plays didn't always show up on the stats sheet, the same way Juan's hockey assists don't show up on the stat sheet, or half the possesion-saving plays he makes.
Dumb plays are really bad when you're an undertalented point guard with talent around you. Harris is light years better than Naadir for a talented team. But it won't show on the stat sheet.
I do think the shots were there for Tharpe because of how bad Selden was. Tharpe was, of course, unquestionably a better shooter than Harris, but his advantages pretty much stop there. It just really made no sense because we saw both Frank and Conner play better than Tharpe that very season, and against good competition.
Re: Jawhawks in the NBA
And a lot of Harris' bad things don't show up in a box score either. He doesn't need to be guarded at all and the impact that has to the rest of the guys on the floor is tangible, especially if they have someone else out there who isn't a serious offensive threat.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 9:34 amA lot of Harris's good things don't show up in the box score. And, that might both be a credit to and knock on him, IDK.Qusdahl wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 9:30 amYeah, he does take care of the ball better and generally play with more awareness and control.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 9:23 am I think Harris is better than Tharpe. Not by a ton, but better overall, and it helps that he's on a team that doesn't need him to score.
And while we don’t need him to score, his 5ppg is maybe the lowest of any Self starter ever. (Trying to think who else was that low…Moody? Face Ass?)
And his lack of scoring allows defenses to gamble off him and guard everybody else tighter.
And it’d be one thing if he was some Rondo type dishing dimes left and right to make up for his lack of scoring, but is 2.8 assists a game is, again, almost half what Tharpe did on a short leash.
But Harris is loads better in transition and that is this team's key to eliteness. He also does get the ball moving on a team that can sometimes get the ball stuck in the half court. While I do think this board overrates Harris's defense at times, it is definitely better than Tharpe's.
Of course, I have been all aboard the play Remy train, but that's not this particular argument.
Re: Jawhawks in the NBA
Yeah.
This team’s ceiling is in transition, if they’re able to turn a game into a track meet.
But - are we really doing that, at least yet? How often do we really score an easy transition bucket?
IS Harris loads better in transition? Is there a fast break points stat for this team?
And while I agree that Harris brings the intangibles, I also don’t know if I’ve ever seen a D1 guard who was less of a threat to score.
Like for real how can a guy drive the lane and be looking everywhere but the rim!
This team’s ceiling is in transition, if they’re able to turn a game into a track meet.
But - are we really doing that, at least yet? How often do we really score an easy transition bucket?
IS Harris loads better in transition? Is there a fast break points stat for this team?
And while I agree that Harris brings the intangibles, I also don’t know if I’ve ever seen a D1 guard who was less of a threat to score.
Like for real how can a guy drive the lane and be looking everywhere but the rim!
“Qusdahl ISNT wrong.” - PDub 1/28
“I dont dislike you, even as wildly flailing and uninformed as your theories are” - TDub 2/5
“I dont dislike you, even as wildly flailing and uninformed as your theories are” - TDub 2/5
Re: Jawhawks in the NBA
Moody, in the year that he started the most games in 05, averaged 5.8.
Jamari Traylor started a number of games in 2015 and averaged 4.8.
Jamari Traylor started a number of games in 2015 and averaged 4.8.
Re: Jawhawks in the NBA
Ohh, good call.
Finally found a starter with stats inferior to Juan.
And go figure it’s illy’s fave!
Finally found a starter with stats inferior to Juan.
And go figure it’s illy’s fave!
“Qusdahl ISNT wrong.” - PDub 1/28
“I dont dislike you, even as wildly flailing and uninformed as your theories are” - TDub 2/5
“I dont dislike you, even as wildly flailing and uninformed as your theories are” - TDub 2/5
Re: Jawhawks in the NBA
Harris has problems finishing at the rim. He is a decent shooter if he can get his head right confidence-wise. I imagine in practices Self sees some things that we are waiting to see consistently.
Re: Jawhawks in the NBA
Only Qusdahl can turn this place into a bunch of Harris apologists.
Harris is, without question, the soft spot on this team. The comparison to Tharpe is fair.
Harris is, without question, the soft spot on this team. The comparison to Tharpe is fair.
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: Jawhawks in the NBA
?Qusdahl wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 9:38 am Yeah.
This team’s ceiling is in transition, if they’re able to turn a game into a track meet.
But - are we really doing that, at least yet? How often do we really score an easy transition bucket?
IS Harris loads better in transition? Is there a fast break points stat for this team?
And while I agree that Harris brings the intangibles, I also don’t know if I’ve ever seen a D1 guard who was less of a threat to score.
Like for real how can a guy drive the lane and be looking everywhere but the rim!
We've been getting out in transition all season. Latest example was . . . Monday night when transition buckets built the lead that we eventually blew. It is a big reason why CB's numbers are so much better this year as he is a killer in transition. Och too as he gets some of his best 3 point looks in transition. We are playing the fastest pace of the Bill Self era, even faster than 2018 (last I checked).
Of course, that's even more reason to play Remy, but Dajuan does fine on the break because of his vision and the fact that he will get the ball down the court quickly.
Re: Jawhawks in the NBA
Well to be fair, I’m so confident about this team’s frontcourt either.
Now somebody give a guttermeter to the Q.
Now somebody give a guttermeter to the Q.
“Qusdahl ISNT wrong.” - PDub 1/28
“I dont dislike you, even as wildly flailing and uninformed as your theories are” - TDub 2/5
“I dont dislike you, even as wildly flailing and uninformed as your theories are” - TDub 2/5
Re: Jawhawks in the NBA
Jayhawks in the NBA thread being dominated by Tharpe, Harris, Moody, FaceAss and Jamari.
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: Jawhawks in the NBA
The soft spots are the 1 and 5 spots on offense, and that gets really tricky in the half court offense.