SCOTUS

Ugh.
User avatar
MICHHAWK
Posts: 6090
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2018 10:01 am

Re: SCOTUS

Post by MICHHAWK »

outside of the few fanatics, no one cares what dt is up to these days.
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 18666
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: SCOTUS

Post by jfish26 »

MICHHAWK wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 8:47 am outside of the few fanatics, no one cares what dt is up to these days.
Few fanatics = 1/3 of the country.
Overlander
Contributor
Posts: 6140
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2021 7:12 pm

Re: SCOTUS

Post by Overlander »

jfish26 wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 9:14 am
MICHHAWK wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 8:47 am outside of the few fanatics, no one cares what dt is up to these days.
Few fanatics = 1/3 of the country.
The dangerous 1/3
“By way of contrast, I'm not the one who feels the need to respond to every post someone else makes”
Psych- Every Single Time
ProudBoy
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2021 10:41 am
Location: Your head, rent free

Re: SCOTUS

Post by ProudBoy »

Trump just texted me. He’s laughing his ass off after pulling the wool over the eyes of the WH archivists. He swears there are probably twice as many documents he tore up that they never found. He also said those in charge of the National Archives can go fuck themselves.
User avatar
sdoyel
Posts: 12426
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2018 11:18 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: SCOTUS

Post by sdoyel »

"The real issue with covid: its not killing enough people." - randylahey

GTS Champ 2008
GTS Champ 2020*

“We good?” - Bill Self

RIP jhawk73

🇺🇦
User avatar
sdoyel
Posts: 12426
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2018 11:18 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: SCOTUS

Post by sdoyel »

"The real issue with covid: its not killing enough people." - randylahey

GTS Champ 2008
GTS Champ 2020*

“We good?” - Bill Self

RIP jhawk73

🇺🇦
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 18666
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: SCOTUS

Post by jfish26 »

sdoyel wrote: Fri Feb 25, 2022 11:25 am
Also, my god, the dog whistling.
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 21046
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: SCOTUS

Post by twocoach »

MICHHAWK wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 8:47 am outside of the few fanatics, no one cares what dt is up to these days.
It's scary that you think this is accurate.
User avatar
KUTradition
Contributor
Posts: 13892
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am

Re: SCOTUS

Post by KUTradition »

fortunately, Jackson has already been through a number of confirmation hearings (one in the past year, if i’m not mistaken). i’m sure she’s well aware of what’s coming down the pipe
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 18666
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: SCOTUS

Post by jfish26 »

KUTradition wrote: Fri Feb 25, 2022 2:19 pm fortunately, Jackson has already been through a number of confirmation hearings (one in the past year, if i’m not mistaken). i’m sure she’s well aware of what’s coming down the pipe
I'm making popcorn for the portion of the proceedings where people who raised no objections to her appointment to the DC Circuit (by which time she was OBVIOUSLY on the D short list for SCOTUS) are all of the sudden "deeply troubled" by or "have real questions about" her candidacy for SCOTUS.
User avatar
KUTradition
Contributor
Posts: 13892
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am

Re: SCOTUS

Post by KUTradition »

jfish26 wrote: Fri Feb 25, 2022 2:21 pm
KUTradition wrote: Fri Feb 25, 2022 2:19 pm fortunately, Jackson has already been through a number of confirmation hearings (one in the past year, if i’m not mistaken). i’m sure she’s well aware of what’s coming down the pipe
I'm making popcorn for the portion of the proceedings where people who raised no objections to her appointment to the DC Circuit (by which time she was OBVIOUSLY on the D short list for SCOTUS) are all of the sudden "deeply troubled" by or "have real questions about" her candidacy for SCOTUS.
right? it’ll be awful curious to see who among the pubs all of a sudden does an about-face
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
User avatar
sdoyel
Posts: 12426
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2018 11:18 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: SCOTUS

Post by sdoyel »

Lindsey Graham for starters.
"The real issue with covid: its not killing enough people." - randylahey

GTS Champ 2008
GTS Champ 2020*

“We good?” - Bill Self

RIP jhawk73

🇺🇦
Overlander
Contributor
Posts: 6140
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2021 7:12 pm

Re: SCOTUS

Post by Overlander »

sdoyel wrote: Fri Feb 25, 2022 6:12 pm Lindsey Graham for starters.
The ultimate “hi, how am I?” Guy
“By way of contrast, I'm not the one who feels the need to respond to every post someone else makes”
Psych- Every Single Time
User avatar
Qusdahl
Posts: 1061
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:53 pm

Re: SCOTUS

Post by Qusdahl »

sdoyel wrote: Fri Feb 25, 2022 11:25 am
At least he IS reviewing the nomination tho…progress?

Wait, nm, that’s not it.

#senateminorityleaderproblems
“Qusdahl ISNT wrong.” - PDub 1/28

“I dont dislike you, even as wildly flailing and uninformed as your theories are” - TDub 2/5
User avatar
Qusdahl
Posts: 1061
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:53 pm

Re: SCOTUS

Post by Qusdahl »

I imagine Mitch’ll dig like hell for skeletons in her closet too
“Qusdahl ISNT wrong.” - PDub 1/28

“I dont dislike you, even as wildly flailing and uninformed as your theories are” - TDub 2/5
User avatar
KUTradition
Contributor
Posts: 13892
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am

Re: SCOTUS

Post by KUTradition »

sdoyel wrote: Fri Feb 25, 2022 6:12 pm Lindsey Graham for starters.
on queue: win for the radical left
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
User avatar
Cascadia
Posts: 6677
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:15 am

Re: SCOTUS

Post by Cascadia »

jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 18666
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: SCOTUS

Post by jfish26 »

Embarrassing. And, should be disqualifying.
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 21046
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: SCOTUS

Post by twocoach »

Watching the GOP try to pin some sort of disqualifying item on Jackson has been comical. She continues to deftly brush them off to the side like the irrelevant gnats they are. She seems to be eminently qualified and reasonable.
Deleted User 863

Re: SCOTUS

Post by Deleted User 863 »

twocoach wrote: Tue Mar 22, 2022 2:26 pm Watching the GOP try to pin some sort of disqualifying item on Jackson has been comical. She continues to deftly brush them off to the side like the irrelevant gnats they are. She seems to be eminently qualified and reasonable.
I like her.
Post Reply