I mean, 2 teams but your point is proven. It hasn't been a great division in terms of playoffs for the AFC West. Just don't know if Russ swings the needle THAT much, to be honest.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Tue Mar 08, 2022 1:34 pmI think it can both be true that Russ should garner that much and that Denver maybe should not have done it.jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 08, 2022 1:30 pmI think it's bad for the Broncos. I don't see Wilson as making them instantly competitive in the division, let alone the conference. And now they've severely kneecapped their ability to backfill with rookie contract depth.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Tue Mar 08, 2022 1:20 pm Ok, yeah, the stuff coming out now makes a lot more sense as far as Russ's value.
But, we shall see. Mahomes has played against an absolutely garbage AFC West since becoming the starter. Only 1 other playoff team in 4 seasons.
NFL Offseason 2022
- NewtonHawk11
- Posts: 12826
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:48 am
- Location: Kansas
Re: NFL Offseason 2022
“I don’t remember anything he said, but it was a very memorable speech.” Julian Wright on a speech Michael Jordan gave to a group he was in
"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: NFL Offseason 2022
I'm not sure it does either, because to your point, Mahomes and Herbert.NewtonHawk11 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 08, 2022 1:37 pmI mean, 2 teams but your point is proven. It hasn't been a great division in terms of playoffs for the AFC West. Just don't know if Russ swings the needle THAT much, to be honest.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Tue Mar 08, 2022 1:34 pmI think it can both be true that Russ should garner that much and that Denver maybe should not have done it.
But, we shall see. Mahomes has played against an absolutely garbage AFC West since becoming the starter. Only 1 other playoff team in 4 seasons.
It does not seem like a coincidence that this went public right after the Rodgers news. Denver was making a move at the position, and when it's that obvious it feels like it came all the way from the top.
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: NFL Offseason 2022
Mina is a big Hawks and Russ fan, so take with a grain of salt.
I do think, in general, with the expanded cap I would rather take on players than picks right now. But, I am not sure how close Denver is.
I do think, in general, with the expanded cap I would rather take on players than picks right now. But, I am not sure how close Denver is.
Re: NFL Offseason 2022
ZOMBIE!!!CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Tue Mar 08, 2022 1:37 pm"Yes." - Pat BowlenNewtonHawk11 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 08, 2022 1:35 pm They went from the 4th best QB in the division to the 3rd best. Is it worth all of that?
Re: NFL Offseason 2022
lol,
Wilson is only good if he has a HOF RB and an elite defense.
Wilson is only good if he has a HOF RB and an elite defense.
- NewtonHawk11
- Posts: 12826
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:48 am
- Location: Kansas
Re: NFL Offseason 2022
They're defense is pretty good. And some decent weapons on offense. But I think we're going to find out how much Lockett was a security blanket for Russ.
“I don’t remember anything he said, but it was a very memorable speech.” Julian Wright on a speech Michael Jordan gave to a group he was in
"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
Re: NFL Offseason 2022
"But, we shall see. Mahomes has played against an absolutely garbage AFC West since becoming the starter."
There's been several worse conferences than the AFC West.
There's been several worse conferences than the AFC West.
Re: NFL Offseason 2022
I do think it's a no brainer for Denver.
They've whiffed on QB for almost ten years.
I actually think they got pretty good value--six to eight years of a no.1 QB?
I also think they are instant contenders in the division.
They've whiffed on QB for almost ten years.
I actually think they got pretty good value--six to eight years of a no.1 QB?
I also think they are instant contenders in the division.
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 12430
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
Re: NFL Offseason 2022
I'm probably somewhat undervaluing the guy by saying this but I don't think Russ single handedly is the difference between the Donkeys being 3-9 and let's say 9-3.
Gutter wrote: Fri Nov 8th 2:16pm
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
Re: NFL Offseason 2022
They were 7-10 last year.
I think Russ is worth 3 or 4 wins.
I'd put the under/over on their win total at 10.5.
I think Russ is worth 3 or 4 wins.
I'd put the under/over on their win total at 10.5.
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 12430
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
Re: NFL Offseason 2022
Yeah, I was basically brain-dead with my post. Not too sure what I was thinking. They were 3-9 in the conference. They certainly don't need to be 9-3 in the AFC to be a playoff contender - and/or to win the West. I agree Russ may be worth 3 or 4 more wins. They do have a tough schedule in 2022.
https://fbschedules.com/2022-denver-broncos-schedule/
https://fbschedules.com/2022-denver-broncos-schedule/
Gutter wrote: Fri Nov 8th 2:16pm
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
Re: NFL Offseason 2022
Pretty sure the Stafford deal by the Rams had some influence. I agree no brainer for Denver.
Re: NFL Offseason 2022
This feels a little like that time the Chiefs got the last two years of Joe Montana's career.
Nero is an angler in the lake of darkness
Re: NFL Offseason 2022
I think the Rams without Stafford are significantly better than the Broncos without Wilson.
Better coach, better front office, better skill players, better defense.
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: NFL Offseason 2022
Where chiefs fans get annoyingly smug is when they start floating around the notion that other teams shouldn't even try to win or compete because how could any AFC team even think they could ever beat the chiefs in the playoffs for the next 15 years?
I don't know if the Broncos made a good move, time will tell, but I don't think you can do any evaluation without the context of the team sale and that they've been coveting a franchise QB for awhile when the division rivals all have one.
I don't know if the Broncos made a good move, time will tell, but I don't think you can do any evaluation without the context of the team sale and that they've been coveting a franchise QB for awhile when the division rivals all have one.
Re: NFL Offseason 2022
I think the Seahawks easily won this deal. Denver now has a mediocre team with no assets while Seattle gets to build a team around a QB on a rookie deal again. That worked out great for them last time. In fact, that's what usually works out unless you have Peyton or Brady (and hopefully soon to be Mahomes)
2017 - Foles - $1.0M
2013 - Wilson - $0.5M
2012 - Flacco - $6.7M
2011 - E. Manning - $6.5M
2010 - Rodgers - $6.0M
2009 - Brees - $4.5M
2008 - Roethlisberger $2.5M
2007 - E. Manning - $6.5M
2017 - Foles - $1.0M
2013 - Wilson - $0.5M
2012 - Flacco - $6.7M
2011 - E. Manning - $6.5M
2010 - Rodgers - $6.0M
2009 - Brees - $4.5M
2008 - Roethlisberger $2.5M
2007 - E. Manning - $6.5M
Re: NFL Offseason 2022
I think where we differ is that I don't think Wilson is a franchise QB.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 9:51 am Where chiefs fans get annoyingly smug is when they start floating around the notion that other teams shouldn't even try to win or compete because how could any AFC team even think they could ever beat the chiefs in the playoffs for the next 15 years?
I don't know if the Broncos made a good move, time will tell, but I don't think you can do any evaluation without the context of the team sale and that they've been coveting a franchise QB for awhile when the division rivals all have one.
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: NFL Offseason 2022
I don't think it is out of the question that the Hawks flip some of that draft capital for a veteran QB if Pete Carroll has his way.
But, just straight out releasing Bobby Wagner means something weird is going down. The consensus around the country seems to be that Seattle lost the trade, and that's where I lean, a lot because of the new cap. The players that Seattle received just don't move the needle.
But, just straight out releasing Bobby Wagner means something weird is going down. The consensus around the country seems to be that Seattle lost the trade, and that's where I lean, a lot because of the new cap. The players that Seattle received just don't move the needle.
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: NFL Offseason 2022
We'll have to agree to disagree then, because I think that is absurd. Unless, you merely mean from today going forward, that makes a little more sense. I still think he has 6-8 good seasons left in him, maybe more with the way he takes care of his, admittedly small, body.Cascadia wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 9:52 amI think where we differ is that I don't think Wilson is a franchise QB.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Wed Mar 09, 2022 9:51 am Where chiefs fans get annoyingly smug is when they start floating around the notion that other teams shouldn't even try to win or compete because how could any AFC team even think they could ever beat the chiefs in the playoffs for the next 15 years?
I don't know if the Broncos made a good move, time will tell, but I don't think you can do any evaluation without the context of the team sale and that they've been coveting a franchise QB for awhile when the division rivals all have one.