You're right. Under Obama we were, not under the Big Orange Loompa.
an even more frightening perspective
Re: an even more frightening perspective
-
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2018 3:22 am
Re: an even more frightening perspective
I’ve driven past California’s wind farms many times over the years near Palm Springs, Tehachapi, and Livermore. Usually from 30-50% of the windmills are not turning. That’s far more than one would expect to be down for routine maintenance, and I saw no sign of maintenance crews around any of them. The fact that others were turning meant that the winds were not too high. Since California imports about one-quarter of its daily electricity from other states, wouldn’t they want those windmills to be turning all the time? Isn’t that cheap, renewable energy?
“When you think of the good old days, think one word: dentistry.” — P.J. O’Rourke
-
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2018 3:22 am
Re: an even more frightening perspective
Look what happens when they do ANYTHING to upset the left:TraditionKU wrote: ↑Tue Jan 01, 2019 11:53 am i’ll ask again, as i have before...how do climate scientists, or scientists in general, benefit from human-induced climate change being fact? they aren’t going to make millions because of it
those that are opposed, however, generally stand to make considerable amounts of money by maintaining the status quo
Yale professor encircled and shouted down for suggesting that some people were making too big a deal about Halloween costumes:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... tumes.html
Google engineer fired for questioning discrimination, as opposed to women’s choices, being responsible for low percentages of women in software engineering:
https://legalinsurrection.com/2017/08/g ... sity-memo/
European Space Agency scientist who landed spacecraft on asteroid attacked for wearing t-shirt that a woman gave to him:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... women.html
“When you think of the good old days, think one word: dentistry.” — P.J. O’Rourke
Re: an even more frightening perspective
Good to know that this is yet another topic being brought up that the poster has no idea what they are talking aboutkubandalum wrote: ↑Sat Jan 05, 2019 6:56 pm I’ve driven past California’s wind farms many times over the years near Palm Springs, Tehachapi, and Livermore. Usually from 30-50% of the windmills are not turning. That’s far more than one would expect to be down for routine maintenance, and I saw no sign of maintenance crews around any of them. The fact that others were turning meant that the winds were not too high. Since California imports about one-quarter of its daily electricity from other states, wouldn’t they want those windmills to be turning all the time? Isn’t that cheap, renewable energy?
Last edited by Deleted User 62 on Thu Jan 10, 2019 10:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2018 3:22 am
Re: an even more frightening perspective
That’s exactly like the people who blame manmade CO2 every time there’s a hurricane. How did droughts happen before SUVs?
“When you think of the good old days, think one word: dentistry.” — P.J. O’Rourke
Re: an even more frightening perspective
who said they didn’t happen?
it’s frequency and severity that are on the increase
it’s frequency and severity that are on the increase
-
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2018 3:22 am
Re: an even more frightening perspective
I tried googling the topic of windmills not turning, but found nothing explaining the high percentage of them. Perhaps you can provide a link for me. If it’s maintenance, one would expect to see some evidence of people around them.jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 6:52 pmGood to know that this is yet another topic being brought up that the poster has no idea what they are talking aboutkubandalum wrote: ↑Sat Jan 05, 2019 6:56 pm I’ve driven past California’s wind farms many times over the years near Palm Springs, Tehachapi, and Livermore. Usually from 30-50% of the windmills are not turning. That’s far more than one would expect to be down for routine maintenance, and I saw no sign of maintenance crews around any of them. The fact that others were turning meant that the winds were not too high. Since California imports about one-quarter of its daily electricity from other states, wouldn’t they want those windmills to be turning all the time? Isn’t that cheap, renewable energy?
“When you think of the good old days, think one word: dentistry.” — P.J. O’Rourke
Re: an even more frightening perspective
even our military believes the professionals
but go ahead and keep your head buried in the sand
but go ahead and keep your head buried in the sand
Re: an even more frightening perspective
did you really? because i just googled it and found a number or resources that point to the most obvious, and logical conclusion...that, go figure, the wind isn’t always blowing with the same force, in the same place, or in the same directionkubandalum wrote: ↑Fri Jan 11, 2019 11:03 amI tried googling the topic of windmills not turning, but found nothing explaining the high percentage of them. Perhaps you can provide a link for me. If it’s maintenance, one would expect to see some evidence of people around them.jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 6:52 pmGood to know that this is yet another topic being brought up that the poster has no idea what they are talking aboutkubandalum wrote: ↑Sat Jan 05, 2019 6:56 pm I’ve driven past California’s wind farms many times over the years near Palm Springs, Tehachapi, and Livermore. Usually from 30-50% of the windmills are not turning. That’s far more than one would expect to be down for routine maintenance, and I saw no sign of maintenance crews around any of them. The fact that others were turning meant that the winds were not too high. Since California imports about one-quarter of its daily electricity from other states, wouldn’t they want those windmills to be turning all the time? Isn’t that cheap, renewable energy?
mind...
blown...
Re: an even more frightening perspective
That is why we cannot count on the wind.TraditionKU wrote: ↑Fri Jan 11, 2019 11:09 amdid you really? because i just googled it and found a number or resources that point to the most obvious, and logical conclusion...that, go figure, the wind isn’t always blowing with the same force, in the same place, or in the same directionkubandalum wrote: ↑Fri Jan 11, 2019 11:03 amI tried googling the topic of windmills not turning, but found nothing explaining the high percentage of them. Perhaps you can provide a link for me. If it’s maintenance, one would expect to see some evidence of people around them.jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 6:52 pm
Good to know that this is yet another topic being brought up that the poster has no idea what they are talking about
mind...
blown...
Re: an even more frightening perspective
Did Illy hand the "dumb" baton off to you at 100m?kubandalum wrote: ↑Fri Jan 11, 2019 10:58 amThat’s exactly like the people who blame manmade CO2 every time there’s a hurricane. How did droughts happen before SUVs?
Re: an even more frightening perspective
What global warming, it's cold out there today.
Do not go gentle into that good night, Old age should burn and rave at close of day; Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Re: an even more frightening perspective
still pounding the table Trad? When you gonna get that hybrid/electric vehicle?
Originally Imzcount (Why do politicians think “hope” is a plan ?)
“Avoid the foolish notion of hope. Hope is the surrender of authority to your fate and trusting it to the whims of the wind”.
Taylor Sheridan
“Avoid the foolish notion of hope. Hope is the surrender of authority to your fate and trusting it to the whims of the wind”.
Taylor Sheridan