pdub wrote: ↑Mon Apr 25, 2022 11:03 am
jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 25, 2022 10:55 am
Ok, but wouldn't it be just
weird for someone to be personally sad over, say, tougher industrial emissions standards?
You have the analogy in reverse.
It wouldn't be weird for someone to be personally sad over the removal of all emissions standards, no.
But you are sad about players getting paid. This was an entire post of yours (I'm not going to cherry-pick bits of it out of context):
I could rename all the reasons that have already been laid out in prior threads but I think the core of it is because college basketball won't be unique anymore and it used to be. And, in the end, college may have nothing at all to do with it.
The side commentary ( sinister ) is just absolute garbage.
You are sad that "college basketball won't be unique anymore."
The specific way in which "college basketball won't be unique anymore" is that its players are going to be treated more fairly.
You are sad about the players being treated more fairly.
I am fully aware of - and I take at face value and in fact give you credit for - your repeated insistence that you'd be fine with a hard-line amateurism stance that would inevitably result in a significant watering-down of the player and coach talent pools.
But unfortunately that is not really all that compatible with being a diehard fan of any Power 5 program, really any Division I program.