SCOTUS
Re: SCOTUS
You have a better theory?
Re: SCOTUS
nothing is ever as simple as that, particular not things as complex as the management and unity of 350 million individual people each with unique goals, problems, and personalities.
Just Ledoux it
Re: SCOTUS
Looks like Kavanaugh is discovering that there is no constitutionally protected right to dine in private, and also discovering what a back alley looks like
FTR: I don’t condone harassment of anyone. However, the exact same legal principles are being applied based upon their judicial rulings.
FTR: I don’t condone harassment of anyone. However, the exact same legal principles are being applied based upon their judicial rulings.
-
KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13899
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: SCOTUS
please, please, please take this argument right back to them
https://www.npr.org/2022/06/26/11077225 ... ous-belief
https://www.npr.org/2022/06/26/11077225 ... ous-belief
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
-
Deleted User 863
Re: SCOTUS
So we should let religion dictate laws. Got it.
I thought you were on the other side of the fence on that.
I thought you were on the other side of the fence on that.
-
RainbowsandUnicorns
- Contributor
- Posts: 12498
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
Re: SCOTUS
Seems maybe you're not comprehending the hypocrisy Trad is/was trying to express.
Gutter wrote: Fri Nov 8th 2:16pm
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
-
Deleted User 863
Re: SCOTUS
I am comprehending his hypocrisy.RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Sat Jul 09, 2022 7:49 am Seems maybe you're not comprehending the hypocrisy Trad is/was trying to express.
-
Deleted User 863
Re: SCOTUS
I think making laws for everyone to follow based on religion(s) that not everyone follows is wrong....even if I agree with the actual law or thing trying to be accomplished.
Re: SCOTUS
zsn wrote: ↑Sat Jul 09, 2022 12:15 am Looks like Kavanaugh is discovering that there is no constitutionally protected right to dine in private, and also discovering what a back alley looks like
FTR: I don’t condone harassment of anyone. However, the exact same legal principles are being applied based upon their judicial rulings.
Re: SCOTUS
Niiiiiiice. If only we can convict and incarcerate Ginni Thomas
Re: SCOTUS
I think Clarence might have sumpin’ to say bout that!
Originally Imzcount (Why do politicians think “hope” is a plan ?)
“Avoid the foolish notion of hope. Hope is the surrender of authority to your fate and trusting it to the whims of the wind”.
Taylor Sheridan
“Avoid the foolish notion of hope. Hope is the surrender of authority to your fate and trusting it to the whims of the wind”.
Taylor Sheridan
Re: SCOTUS
And, it’s really telling about the Law And Order Party that a majority of its members see no problem that a Supreme Court Justice has an influence on how Justice is administered to a family member.
The devolution into the proverbial Banana Republic is complete.
-
RainbowsandUnicorns
- Contributor
- Posts: 12498
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
Re: SCOTUS
Gutter wrote: Fri Nov 8th 2:16pm
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
