he’s better/smarter than this
maybe Cascadia was right all along…
he’s better/smarter than this
if you're anti-MIC, then why are you also so insistent on drinking the MIC Qool-aid? You realize there may be more to the story than the narrative imposed by the folks who see Ukraine as just another payday, right?KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Sep 20, 2022 3:15 pm and seriously, dude…i’m on your side as far as being anti-MIC
but i’m also a realist
could we expand on this please? Do you have any further insight or analysis to offer?the US deciding to “play nice” and get out of the war business assures one thing: that some other power is going to fill that vacuum
I'm not sure. But I'll go out on a limb and guess maybe some other country with a sense of "freedom and democracy" that extends at least slightly beyond militant aggression. Maybe some other country that's made some effort to come to terms with its own identity and history of genocide and brutality. Maybe some other country that actually gives its people healthcare, and housing, and sick leave too, rather than expect its own people to suffer while our tax dollars go mostly toward war, war, war! Maybe some other country that isn't thee biggest police state, with the most and most brutal cops, and the biggest prison population by a long shot. Maybe some other country that isn't so quick to downplay and to normalize white supremacy. Maybe some other country that wasn't thee country that inspired Hitler with their own history of Jim Crow and segregation and deplorable treatment of blacks, natives, and pretty much anyone else who didn't fit the white power agenda.
tell me, which country do think would do a better job? (“no country” isn’t a legitimate answer since it isn’t grounds in reality)
KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Sep 20, 2022 3:16 pm put another way, i don’t like the US being in these situations, but i prefer it over the most likely alternative scenarios
Matthew 7:3-5KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Sep 20, 2022 3:10 pmwe’ve been over thisousdahl wrote: ↑Tue Sep 20, 2022 2:55 pmDo you think Merica is a good example of morality and ethical behavior?KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Sep 20, 2022 2:40 pm and yeah, i suppose we shoulda just stayed out and let putin do as he chooses
former KGB are known for their morality and ethical behavior
jfc
And I know you'll give me shit for this too, but I think there's some question of whether Putin would have ever invaded if not for us arming his belligerent neighbors first, and doubling down every time we otherwise had the chance for more diplomatic measures.
putin was bullying the region long before the Eukraine invasion
it’s like you’ve got selective memory loss
and of course we’ve got our own problems. how very putin/trump of you to point them out…smh
I feel bad about it.
Cascadia was right about what?KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Sep 20, 2022 3:17 pmhe’s better/smarter than this
maybe Cascadia was right all along…
Sorry Oussie, didn't mean to pile on. I thought Traddie's post was funny is all. Carry on.ousdahl wrote: ↑Tue Sep 20, 2022 4:32 pmCascadia was right about what?KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Sep 20, 2022 3:17 pmhe’s better/smarter than this
maybe Cascadia was right all along…
I’m bummed that you of all people are insulting my intelligence.
But heck, I’ve never thought I was as smart as everyone else told me I was either, so maybe you’re right.
“The greatest wisdom is in knowing we know nothing.” - SoQrates
If I may ask, am I better/smarter than what?
If the people of Texas or in a few counties in Texas want to secede from the United States, do you think the United States should just have no say in that? No, obviously not.ousdahl wrote: ↑Tue Sep 20, 2022 2:21 pm thanks for another gaslight bro.
My point is, that article mentions what Merica thinks is best for those regions, and what Russia thinks is best for those regions, and what France thinks is best for those regions, and what Germany thinks is best for those regions, and what England thinks is best for those regions
but no one seems to want to just ask what the people of those regions think is best for those regions.
why shouldn't we?
are we really better off letting a bunch of historical imperial powers decide for them? If so, how do we decide which imperial power is the one who should get to decide?
the article mentions letting the people of these regions vote their own destiny. In an of itself, without getting into the legal technicalities, are you opposed to letting the people have their own say? Or are they allowed to exist not as people of their own independent identity, but only as pawns in some bigger international game?
if we ARE to get into the legal technicalities and whatnot, yea, the whole vote thing might be dubious. Perhaps there's a question of, if Merica really wants to be the harbingers of "freedom and democracy" that we wanna be, shouldn't we be advocating for a legitimate and legal vote for these peoples? Rather than advocating for *checks notes* little more than just blindly throwing more and more weapons at it?
...and, don't get me wrong! I don't wanna concede anything to Russia either!
oh, and speaking of propaganda, I dunno how much I trust an article that leads off with terms like "sham" in the very first sentence. Is that language really of the highest journalistic integrity? I'm skeptical of everything, and when I hear language like that, it strikes me as likely more propaganda yet.