Today in "so much winning"!
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
In order to understand the frustration and outrage, you need only look at the initial media reports.
They were so wildly inaccurate and so poorly investigated, with the specific goal being to bolster a worldview and a narrative. It didn't matter who or what got hurt in the process. And as always, the truth was the first casualty. No it's a competition between narratives, with most people believing that any concession is a full-blown admission that the "bad guys" should win -- whether you define bad guys as the kids, the media, the BHIs or me.
They were so wildly inaccurate and so poorly investigated, with the specific goal being to bolster a worldview and a narrative. It didn't matter who or what got hurt in the process. And as always, the truth was the first casualty. No it's a competition between narratives, with most people believing that any concession is a full-blown admission that the "bad guys" should win -- whether you define bad guys as the kids, the media, the BHIs or me.
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
From you -- the Illy of the Left -- I'll take that for what it's worth.
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
Great Zinger.
High praise, since you seem to keep Illy perched on your tit.
High praise, since you seem to keep Illy perched on your tit.
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
This is exactly correct and either depressing, infuriating, or both.
Everyone acted like an asshole here. It's seemingly human nature. Now it's just publicized with the spin of people with agendas.
The depressing part is I don't see a path for the general public to be able to understand this anytime in the foreseeable future.
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
maybe it’s just me, but i don’t think Phillips acted like an asshole
and, it’s been mentioned (though not talked about enough), but where were the adult chaperones in all of this?
if the kids get a pass cuz they’re just kids being kids, then at least done onus should fall on the adults that were responsible for them
jmo, but with everything i’ve read and seen, it seems to that while the original reports mischaracterized the situation/s, they by no means changed the perception that these were entitled little shits that shouldn’t have been in the middle of this in the first place. and sorry, but wearing maga hats in that sort of environment is asking for confrontation, right or wrong
and, it’s been mentioned (though not talked about enough), but where were the adult chaperones in all of this?
if the kids get a pass cuz they’re just kids being kids, then at least done onus should fall on the adults that were responsible for them
jmo, but with everything i’ve read and seen, it seems to that while the original reports mischaracterized the situation/s, they by no means changed the perception that these were entitled little shits that shouldn’t have been in the middle of this in the first place. and sorry, but wearing maga hats in that sort of environment is asking for confrontation, right or wrong
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
Someone who agrees that they were "entitled little shits..."
As a (retired) soccer referee, I dreaded officiating matches where Covington Catholic was involved. The fans were always among the rudest, most disrespectful, and mean-spirited that I've encountered--and I've refereed for a long time at almost every level of the game!
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1087 ... Cb7bxBEk3I
It shouldn't seem surprising to anyone that teenage boys acted like jerks. Tradition seems to ask the correct question in where were the chaperones?
But perhaps we should be asking why the president and all leaders, secular and religious, aren't mounting a national campaign to reduce the threats of violence to anyone who becomes a public figure through social media exposure.
As a (retired) soccer referee, I dreaded officiating matches where Covington Catholic was involved. The fans were always among the rudest, most disrespectful, and mean-spirited that I've encountered--and I've refereed for a long time at almost every level of the game!
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1087 ... Cb7bxBEk3I
It shouldn't seem surprising to anyone that teenage boys acted like jerks. Tradition seems to ask the correct question in where were the chaperones?
But perhaps we should be asking why the president and all leaders, secular and religious, aren't mounting a national campaign to reduce the threats of violence to anyone who becomes a public figure through social media exposure.
Don't inject Lysol.
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
because without the divisiveness, they (at least drumpf) would loose some power
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
The irony in your post is that I find it "weird" some people decide to spend their "free time" on here and I can't figure out if they realize that it comes off to others that they "take such enjoyment" in persistently insulting people who they disagree with on this site.
I don't really care to judge Nick Sandmann anymore but if someone asked me my opinion at this moment how I feel about him - I would say I think the kid COMES OFF as being both an "arrogant prick" and after watching an interview of him - a timid fucking robotic (possibly heavily medicated) pussy.
Meanwhile, he may be a terrific kid. I hope he is for his sake and the world's sake.
MAGA!
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
Great question 99! Wouldn't it be nice and yet it seems it will never be let go because we will always have "division" in this country - to extremes that I just can't fathom.
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
i did not write that...promise
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
Lady on CNN last night said MAGA hats trigger her and therefore people shouldn't be allowed to wear them, and if they do then they are racists.
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
Out of respect to 99 I’ll try to refrain from beating the dead horse that is this particular incident with the Catholic keeds.
Out of respect to the civil rights movement I’ll mention we still have a lot of work and a lot of dialogue before the nation as a whole is ever gonna “let this go.”
Out of respect to the civil rights movement I’ll mention we still have a lot of work and a lot of dialogue before the nation as a whole is ever gonna “let this go.”
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
At face value, the MAGA hats represent a rather extreme and controversial political agenda. To wear it out in the open is inviting extreme and controversial reactions, though I suppose that’s a first amendment thing, both ways.IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jan 23, 2019 8:52 am Lady on CNN last night said MAGA hats trigger her and therefore people shouldn't be allowed to wear them, and if they do then they are racists.
But, as I’ve already asked, to what degree can a MAGA hat, and chanting “build the wall,” be interpreted as racist messaging in itself? Can you separate one from the other?
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
Funny, people in "pussy hats" making rude comments about people in MAGA hats....and vice versa.
Both hats are worn mostly to get a rise out of someone.
Both hats are worn mostly to get a rise out of someone.
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
Yes but females in "pussy hat" works for me. A rise that is.jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jan 23, 2019 9:31 am Funny, people in "pussy hats" making rude comments about people in MAGA hats....and vice versa.
Both hats are worn mostly to get a rise out of someone.
Originally Imzcount (Why do politicians think “hope” is a plan ?)
“Avoid the foolish notion of hope. Hope is the surrender of authority to your fate and trusting it to the whims of the wind”.
Taylor Sheridan
“Avoid the foolish notion of hope. Hope is the surrender of authority to your fate and trusting it to the whims of the wind”.
Taylor Sheridan
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
This is dumb. It is over when we stop talking about it. Lets move on.
Pelosi just cancelled the State of the Union address by stating that she will not pass the required resolution to hold the State of the Union in the House chambers "because the government is closed".
Pelosi just cancelled the State of the Union address by stating that she will not pass the required resolution to hold the State of the Union in the House chambers "because the government is closed".
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
Why did she have to do another #bossmove if her original #bossmove was so #bossy?