Conspiracies

[PhDhawk]

An opinion article written by a cultural anthropologist in a popular magazine.

Yep. I'm convinced. Science us bullshit.

If there's something dumb written in a popular mechanics magazine, that discredits everything Einstein ever did too right?

[PhDhawk]

I had a paint by numbers poster with a typo. That's when I stopped trusting mathematics.

[DCHawk1]

You're kicking those imaginary dragons' asses.

I'll give you that.

[pdub]

I still kick imaginary dragons asses.

[pdub]

Imagine Dragons though, suck.

[DCHawk1]

Not as well as PhD does -- kicking dragons' asses, that is.

[PhDhawk]

A fucking freshman in an intro course would know better than to cite an opinion article in scientific American....it's not a scholarly journal, it's not peer reviewed. It's not even science...it's a magazine...like people or esquire. It was an opinion piece by a soft scientist who is trying to sell a bullshit book.

You're trying way too hard if this is the barrel you're scraping around in.

[PhDhawk]

Who posted a magazine article about anthropology to try to circuitously discredit vaccines?

The dots you're trying to connect aren't there.

[DCHawk1]

Who posted a magazine article about anthropology to try to circuitously discredit vaccines?

That's an excellent question.

I have no idea who did that.

Do you have a link?

[PhDhawk]

Lulz

[DCHawk1]

A fucking freshman in an intro course would know better than to cite an opinion article in scientific American....it's not a scholarly journal, it's not peer reviewed. It's not even science...it's a magazine...like people or esquire. It was an opinion piece by a soft scientist who is trying to sell a bullshit book.

You're trying way too hard if this is the barrel you're scraping around in.

A fucking freshman might also know that your anger and defensiveness are off-the-charts weird.

[DCHawk1]

Lulz

I know, right?





Srsly, though.

[PhDhawk]

What's weird is your attack on all of science.

You shoulda just DMd lobster and randy directly.

[DCHawk1]

You're trying way too hard if this is the barrel you're scraping around in.

Trying too hard to do what?

What am I doing?

What are you doing?

[DCHawk1]

What's weird is your attack on all of science.

You shoulda just DMd lobster and randy directly.

Again, what are you talking about? When did I attack "all of science?"

Settle down.

[PhDhawk]

i DoN't UnDeRsTaNd WhY dUmBaSsEs WoN't JuSt TrUsT sCiEnCe!

[DCHawk1]

Yes. And?

Is there an attack on science in that...or is it something you attributed to me based on something else?

[PhDhawk]

Giggle

[DCHawk1]

Gotcha.

[japhy]

An opinion article written by a cultural anthropologist in a popular magazine.

Yep. I'm convinced. Science us bullshit.

If there's something dumb written in a popular mechanics magazine, that discredits everything Einstein ever did too right?

I have to question your science bonafides. You are dismissive of the importance of this subject with "real scientists". A quick check shows this study to be a front page concern within the learned scientific community. Maybe it is you who isn't in tune with current discussions in real science.

https://www.foxnews.com/sports/tony-dun ... ridiculous