2024
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13889
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: 2024
too bad RussianHawk (i think that’s right) isn’t still around
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
Re: 2024
Is there anything that he doesn't know better than everyone? His grandiose ego can't even walk into a damn McDonalds without claiming to know their work better than the employees. What an asshat.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-con ... c-20366662
Have an unreasonably high sense of self-importance and require constant, excessive admiration. CHECK
Feel that they deserve privileges and special treatment. CHECK
Expect to be recognized as superior even without achievements. CHECK
Make achievements and talents seem bigger than they are. CHECK
Be preoccupied with fantasies about success, power, brilliance, beauty or the perfect mate. CHECK
Believe they are superior to others and can only spend time with or be understood by equally special people. CHECK
Be critical of and look down on people they feel are not important. CHECK
Expect special favors and expect other people to do what they want without questioning them. CHECK
Take advantage of others to get what they want. CHECK
Have an inability or unwillingness to recognize the needs and feelings of others. CHECK
Be envious of others and believe others envy them. CHECK
Behave in an arrogant way, brag a lot and come across as conceited. CHECK
Insist on having the best of everything — for instance, the best car or office. CHECK
Re: 2024
Republicans would be stupid to make the train derailment in Ohio an issue in '24 as they played a large hand in deregulation that helped to lead to the event.
As for Ukraine, I wouldn't be surprised if we see Russia start to drag this out so it is still going on leading up to the '24 election so that the Dems look bad continuing to send money/aid to Ukraine. The GOP absolutely will make that an issue, as they should.
Re: 2024
They will hammer (and rightfully so) that Biden said some of our Aid should go to funding Ukrainian pensions.....in the face of our own social security funds dwindling to nothing.twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Feb 24, 2023 10:10 amRepublicans would be stupid to make the train derailment in Ohio an issue in '24 as they played a large hand in deregulation that helped to lead to the event.
As for Ukraine, I wouldn't be surprised if we see Russia start to drag this out so it is still going on leading up to the '24 election so that the Dems look bad continuing to send money/aid to Ukraine. The GOP absolutely will make that an issue, as they should.
Just Ledoux it
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 12450
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
Re: 2024
2023 Chicago Mayoral Election.
In 30 minutes I'm voting for someone who has no chance of winning. I'm voting less for her (Sophia King) than I am voting against those who I feel do have a chance.
I absolutely do NOT want Lightfoot, Garcia, Wilson, or Johnson to win. I won't be happy but I might tolerate Vallas winning.
This is what's nuts. My guess is no one gets 50.1% of the vote (needed so there isn't a run off).
My guess is no one gets 40% of the vote. In other words, whoever is elected Mayor, more than 59% of voters do NOT want that person to be their Mayor. To me, the system is broken.
Here is my prediction for today.
Vallas 30%
Lightfoot 18%
Garcia 17%
Johnson 16%
Wilson 14%
The rest 5%
In 30 minutes I'm voting for someone who has no chance of winning. I'm voting less for her (Sophia King) than I am voting against those who I feel do have a chance.
I absolutely do NOT want Lightfoot, Garcia, Wilson, or Johnson to win. I won't be happy but I might tolerate Vallas winning.
This is what's nuts. My guess is no one gets 50.1% of the vote (needed so there isn't a run off).
My guess is no one gets 40% of the vote. In other words, whoever is elected Mayor, more than 59% of voters do NOT want that person to be their Mayor. To me, the system is broken.
Here is my prediction for today.
Vallas 30%
Lightfoot 18%
Garcia 17%
Johnson 16%
Wilson 14%
The rest 5%
Gutter wrote: Fri Nov 8th 2:16pm
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 12450
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
Re: 2024
At the risk of someone who more people want doesn't win an election? Yes, I feel that's a problem.
Gutter wrote: Fri Nov 8th 2:16pm
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 12450
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
Re: 2024
All depends on what we are discussing and what are the repercussions.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Tue Feb 28, 2023 8:05 amBetter to have too many choices than too few choices in my opinion.
Example.....
Let's say 23% of voting Chicagoans want Vallas, 22% want Johnson, 20% want Lightfoot, and 19% want Chuey. The remaining 16% are split between King, Buckner, Wilson, Sawyer, and Green.
The 16% that are split are very possibly (if not probably) going to end up costing either Vallas, Johnson, Lightfoot, or Chuey the election.
Of course it can also work in Vallas, Johnson, Lightfoot, or Chuey's advantage.
So maybe it is "fair"?
I just feel too many shit candidates does the CITIZENS no good. That's because I don't like any of the leading candidates and don't want them to be the city's Mayor. Seems many if not most Chicagoans agree with me.
Gutter wrote: Fri Nov 8th 2:16pm
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
Re: 2024
I definitely understand what you're saying.RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Tue Feb 28, 2023 9:00 amAll depends on what we are discussing and what are the repercussions.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Tue Feb 28, 2023 8:05 amBetter to have too many choices than too few choices in my opinion.
Example.....
Let's say 23% of voting Chicagoans want Vallas, 22% want Johnson, 20% want Lightfoot, and 19% want Chuey. The remaining 16% are split between King, Buckner, Wilson, Sawyer, and Green.
The 16% that are split are very possibly (if not probably) going to end up costing either Vallas, Johnson, Lightfoot, or Chuey the election.
Of course it can also work in Vallas, Johnson, Lightfoot, or Chuey's advantage.
So maybe it is "fair"?
I just feel too many shit candidates does the CITIZENS no good. That's because I don't like any of the leading candidates and don't want them to be the city's Mayor. Seems many if not most Chicagoans agree with me.
I just don't think it's better to have a candidate in a 2 person race get 51% of the vote but half of their portion viewed them as the lesser of 2 evils.
I'd rather have as many people as possible be able to vote for someone they believe will do a good job, even if that means there are 7 candidates and the winner only gets 28% of the total vote.
Re: 2024
Seems like you’re just a strong advocate for ranked choice votingRainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Tue Feb 28, 2023 9:00 amAll depends on what we are discussing and what are the repercussions.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Tue Feb 28, 2023 8:05 amBetter to have too many choices than too few choices in my opinion.
Example.....
Let's say 23% of voting Chicagoans want Vallas, 22% want Johnson, 20% want Lightfoot, and 19% want Chuey. The remaining 16% are split between King, Buckner, Wilson, Sawyer, and Green.
The 16% that are split are very possibly (if not probably) going to end up costing either Vallas, Johnson, Lightfoot, or Chuey the election.
Of course it can also work in Vallas, Johnson, Lightfoot, or Chuey's advantage.
So maybe it is "fair"?
I just feel too many shit candidates does the CITIZENS no good. That's because I don't like any of the leading candidates and don't want them to be the city's Mayor. Seems many if not most Chicagoans agree with me.
Rank them most to least crappy