You did. You said we looked best on paper. Ignoring the 31 games we actually played in which we looked the best.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Wed Mar 15, 2023 1:50 pmSorry. Had to take you off ignore real quick.PhDhawk wrote: ↑Wed Mar 15, 2023 1:38 pmBeing the #1 seed overall is not the same as being A 1 seed.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Wed Mar 15, 2023 12:00 pm Gross. Just hanging banners for woulda been a 1 seed now?
Being a 1 seed doesn't = national champion.
Being the best team on paper doesn't = national champion.
Should Baylor hang a banner too? They were going to be a 1 seed and were definitely one of the best teams.
Personal preference obviously, but seems silly to me. There was no national champion that year because no tournament was held. That's okay with me. I think canceling it was the right move at the time.
Being ranked #1 in the nation after 30+ games means more than just being best on paper.
I mean, until the 1990s this is how EVERY college football champion was determined.
If you don't want to recognize that team that's fine. But don't minimize the things they ACTUALLY did accomplish.
Nobody is minimizing their accomplishments. At all. But winning a national title is not something they accomplished.
Not sure what college football 30+ years ago has to do with anything?
We were definitely the "best" team in CBB in 19-20. Unfortunately college basketball didn't get to crown a narional champion due to covid. And the NCAA chose not to pick a champion based on media and coaches voting.
I do wish that entire team would have returned to handle their unfinished business. Which was an option.
You remarked that we were A 1 seed, we were going to be the overall #1 seed, and were ranked #1.
You tried to downplay our accomplishments, like you always do. You always gotta be the fun killing devil's advocate.
It's like saying last years team won >20 games, and then I get mad because they won 34 and a national title...and then you're like, hey man, I'm giving them credit, they did win >20 games after all.