Another mass shooting

[KUTradition]

You sure acted like it. Remember all the things you thought were necessary for us to do

like i said, keep swinging

your level of dumb is entertaining

Thats amazing that you were so insistent back then, only to find out later you were never actually that concerned about it


LOL

i was always in favor of common sense measure to support public health

i was never in favor of forced anything on the general public

don’t be dumb and conflate that my support for governments/institutions/businesses to do what they felt were necessary measures for the safety of their employees

i ALWAYS was very clear that if “you” didn’t want to get vaccinated, that it was your prerogative and within your rights…just expect that your choice would have consequences on your levels of participation in society…no different than most other vaccines

not that hard, dumdum

[randylahey]

[pdub]

Why do people like Tim Pool all wear hats all the time?
It's like 80% of them wear hats.

[twocoach]

Any plan that includes "seizing guns" is guaranteed to lead to a civil war. So no, not valid

Yeah, right. All the big talkers are gonna go to war against their own country and get immediately wiped off the map? No. There would be some protests and whining but those people aren't going to war against a far superior opponent.

[randylahey]

Any plan that includes "seizing guns" is guaranteed to lead to a civil war. So no, not valid

Yeah, right. All the big talkers are gonna go to war against their own country and get immediately wiped off the map? No. There would be some protests and whining but those people aren't going to war against a far superior opponent.

No soldier is going to want to risk their life to kill their own countrymen either. And you can't immediately wipe millions of gun owners off the map without destroying the whole country

[jfish26]

Any plan that includes "seizing guns" is guaranteed to lead to a civil war. So no, not valid

Yeah, right. All the big talkers are gonna go to war against their own country and get immediately wiped off the map? No. There would be some protests and whining but those people aren't going to war against a far superior opponent.

No soldier is going to want to risk their life to kill their own countrymen either. And you can't immediately wipe millions of gun owners off the map without destroying the whole country

But don't you see the problem here? Absolutely NO ONE serious is talking about anything remotely CLOSE to this.

But you - a rube - being manipulated as you have been into stirring shit like this, stir other people's shit. And that's what leads to paranoia and "misunderstandings" and "accidents" and so on.

Just fucking STOP. There was not "almost" a civil war over the last election. There's not GOING to be a "civil war" over gun control.

You are being exploited.

[jfish26]

Why do people like Tim Pool all wear hats all the time?
It's like 80% of them wear hats.

Oooooh, pick me! Pick me!

[MICHHAWK]

and to think, a ksu fan got banned from this site for being proud of his school.

[twocoach]

Any plan that includes "seizing guns" is guaranteed to lead to a civil war. So no, not valid

Yeah, right. All the big talkers are gonna go to war against their own country and get immediately wiped off the map? No. There would be some protests and whining but those people aren't going to war against a far superior opponent.

No soldier is going to want to risk their life to kill their own countrymen either. And you can't immediately wipe millions of gun owners off the map without destroying the whole country

There wouldn't be millions willing to take up arms against the country.

[pdub]

This is the poli bored.
It's a shit show.
Do your thing ( also tmcats isn't banned - he can return in just over 2 weeks ).

I just lost it temporarily because I watched a video of an officer ( and good on him ) doing his job and gun nuts are out there saying 'thoughts and prayers' and 'look at the hero' while, in the video, the officer walks right past a dead 9 year old on the ground. Forgive me, but I simply cannot imagine what those parents are going through now. It's personal, I'll admit it.

And now instead of, 'god we really should do something about this gun problem, those are children' it's 'i dare you to come take my guns!'

If that's your first thought when people are trying to figure out solutions, fuck you to your fucking shitty rotten ass worthless core.
- pdub out of polibored

[twocoach]

Yeah, right. All the big talkers are gonna go to war against their own country and get immediately wiped off the map? No. There would be some protests and whining but those people aren't going to war against a far superior opponent.

No soldier is going to want to risk their life to kill their own countrymen either. And you can't immediately wipe millions of gun owners off the map without destroying the whole country

But don't you see the problem here? Absolutely NO ONE serious is talking about anything remotely CLOSE to this.

But you - a rube - being manipulated as you have been into stirring shit like this, stir other people's shit. And that's what leads to paranoia and "misunderstandings" and "accidents" and so on.

Just fucking STOP. There was not "almost" a civil war over the last election. There's not GOING to be a "civil war" over gun control.

You are being exploited.

The narrative that so many people care this much about it that they are willing to die is necessary to sell the importance of the battle for their freedom so that the power players can continue to exploit them for their money. It sells guns and ammo for people to believe they are arming themselves to defend against their own country because that was part of the intent of the amendment in the Constitution.

"I'm a Constitution loving Patriot" is a lot easier to sell as a positive character trait rather than "my balls tingle when I shoot big guns".

No one is going to tey to take everyone's guns and no one is raising arms against the army.

This same conversation dissolves into the same stupidity over and over and over again despite the rights claim that they are interested in "reasonable discussion" over changes. The country is littered with failed bills of reasonable changes that the right killed on the vine.

[randylahey]

Theres a lot of things we can do that don't involve breaking the fundamentals of this country and taking guns away from law abiding citizens

[TDub]

Why do people like Tim Pool all wear hats all the time?
It's like 80% of them wear hats.

Id wager that I wear a hat probably 85% of my waking hours and 95% of my outside the house hours.


Though almost never those weird little non functional beanie things these guys seem to love

[jfish26]

No soldier is going to want to risk their life to kill their own countrymen either. And you can't immediately wipe millions of gun owners off the map without destroying the whole country

But don't you see the problem here? Absolutely NO ONE serious is talking about anything remotely CLOSE to this.

But you - a rube - being manipulated as you have been into stirring shit like this, stir other people's shit. And that's what leads to paranoia and "misunderstandings" and "accidents" and so on.

Just fucking STOP. There was not "almost" a civil war over the last election. There's not GOING to be a "civil war" over gun control.

You are being exploited.

The narrative that so many people care this much about it that they are willing to die is necessary to sell the importance of the battle for their freedom so that the power players can continue to exploit them for their money. It sells guns and ammo for people to believe they are arming themselves to defend against their own country because that was part of the intent of the amendment in the Constitution.

"I'm a Constitution loving Patriot" is a lot easier to sell as a positive character trait rather than "my balls tingle when I shoot big guns".

No one is going to tey to take everyone's guns and no one is raising arms against the army.

This same conversation dissolves into the same stupidity over and over and over again despite the rights claim that they are interested in "reasonable discussion" over changes. The country is littered with failed bills of reasonable changes that the right killed on the vine.

What's sad is that the message isn't, "this is how you prove you're a Constitution loving Patriot." It's, "if you don't do this, it proves you're a Constitution hating libtard."

[jfish26]

Theres a lot of things we can do that don't involve breaking the fundamentals of this country and taking guns away from law abiding citizens

True or false: banning AR-15s and the like would "break the fundamentals of this country."

True or false. No slippery slope stuff, etc.

True, or false.

[randylahey]

True. The point of the 2 amendment is to defend against a tyrannical government

A tyrannical government exists, and has been wanting to do away with the 2a for decades. An ar is an effective tool for self defense

[Shirley]

“Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller (ruling) support(s) the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons.”
Antonin Scalia, Heller

[randylahey]

Shall not be infringed upon

[jfish26]

True. The point of the 2 amendment is to defend against a tyrannical government

A tyrannical government exists, and has been wanting to do away with the 2a for decades. An ar is an effective tool for self defense

I didn't say "True (if), or false (but)."

Is it true, or is it false, that banning private purchases of assault rifles would "break the fundamentals of this country."

The answer cannot be "true," because that is absurd. Life would go right on as usual (indeed, for thousands, it would go on longer).

The answer must then be "false." But of course, you can't admit that, because you cannot admit that you are - when it really comes down to it - saying that the freedom to own a plaything is worth the cost in blood.

[jfish26]

Shall not be infringed upon

Real Constitution lovers would quote the Constitution accurately, at least.