Charges
-
RainbowsandUnicorns
- Contributor
- Posts: 12521
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
Re: Charges
Gutter wrote: Fri Nov 8th 2:16pm
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
Re: Charges
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Frank Wilhoit
Frank Wilhoit
-
randylahey
- Posts: 8971
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm
Re: Charges
Violation of campaign finance laws is a crime.
Though, perjury is worse and that seemed to be ignored for a different Prez.
Talking precedence moreso than whatabouting.
Though, perjury is worse and that seemed to be ignored for a different Prez.
Talking precedence moreso than whatabouting.
Re: Charges
Well, well, well.. This isn't very good news for the leader of the Trump Cult:
Meadows, other top Trump aides ordered to testify in Jan. 6 probe as judge rejects claims of executive privilege
A federal judge has rejected former President Donald Trump's claims of executive privilege and has ordered Mark Meadows and other former top aides to testify before a federal grand jury investigating Trump's efforts to overturn the election leading up to the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, multiple sources familiar with the matter tell ABC News.
...In a sealed order last week, Judge Beryl Howell rejected Trump's claim of executive privilege for Meadows and a number of others, including Trump's former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe, his former national security adviser Robert O'Brien, former top aide Stephen Miller, and former deputy chief of staff and social media director Dan Scavino, according to sources familiar with the matter.
Former Trump aides Nick Luna and John McEntee, along with former top DHS official Ken Cuccinelli, were also included in the order, the sources said.
[...]
Meadows, other top Trump aides ordered to testify in Jan. 6 probe as judge rejects claims of executive privilege
A federal judge has rejected former President Donald Trump's claims of executive privilege and has ordered Mark Meadows and other former top aides to testify before a federal grand jury investigating Trump's efforts to overturn the election leading up to the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, multiple sources familiar with the matter tell ABC News.
...In a sealed order last week, Judge Beryl Howell rejected Trump's claim of executive privilege for Meadows and a number of others, including Trump's former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe, his former national security adviser Robert O'Brien, former top aide Stephen Miller, and former deputy chief of staff and social media director Dan Scavino, according to sources familiar with the matter.
Former Trump aides Nick Luna and John McEntee, along with former top DHS official Ken Cuccinelli, were also included in the order, the sources said.
[...]
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Frank Wilhoit
Frank Wilhoit
Re: Charges
Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg receives threatening letter with white powder
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Frank Wilhoit
Frank Wilhoit
Re: Charges
Pretty classic numbers play. Doesn't take all that much Law & Order watching to see the strategy here.Feral wrote: ↑Fri Mar 24, 2023 3:49 pm Well, well, well.. This isn't very good news for the leader of the Trump Cult:
Meadows, other top Trump aides ordered to testify in Jan. 6 probe as judge rejects claims of executive privilege
A federal judge has rejected former President Donald Trump's claims of executive privilege and has ordered Mark Meadows and other former top aides to testify before a federal grand jury investigating Trump's efforts to overturn the election leading up to the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, multiple sources familiar with the matter tell ABC News.
...In a sealed order last week, Judge Beryl Howell rejected Trump's claim of executive privilege for Meadows and a number of others, including Trump's former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe, his former national security adviser Robert O'Brien, former top aide Stephen Miller, and former deputy chief of staff and social media director Dan Scavino, according to sources familiar with the matter.
Former Trump aides Nick Luna and John McEntee, along with former top DHS official Ken Cuccinelli, were also included in the order, the sources said.
[...]
Re: Charges
So much winning!
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Frank Wilhoit
Frank Wilhoit
-
NewtonHawk11
- Posts: 12826
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:48 am
- Location: Kansas
Re: Charges
Welp, here we go.
“I don’t remember anything he said, but it was a very memorable speech.” Julian Wright on a speech Michael Jordan gave to a group he was in
"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
-
randylahey
- Posts: 8971
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm
Re: Charges
Its bad news. Not for Trump supporters. But for the country in general. Legally targeting political opponents is a horrible precedent to set
Re: Charges
Lock her up! Lock her up!randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Mar 30, 2023 6:13 pm Its bad news. Not for Trump supporters. But for the country in general. Legally targeting political opponents is a horrible precedent to set
So politicians who break the law - you think nothing should happen to them?
Re: Charges
"Targeting"? The world had ringside seats to his illegal behavior. It's just investigating clearly committed crimes. Frankly, it should be criminally negligent not to investigate them.randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Mar 30, 2023 6:13 pm Its bad news. Not for Trump supporters. But for the country in general. Legally targeting political opponents is a horrible precedent to set
Re: Charges
It's a good night to stay home.
Re: Charges
I mean - this charge in particular is pretty weak. Not necessarily legally, but campaign finance violation... meh.
But the idea that we shouldn't charge someone with crimes because they're politicians, as a whole, is nuts.
But the idea that we shouldn't charge someone with crimes because they're politicians, as a whole, is nuts.
Re: Charges
It's OK when DDD does it.Mjl wrote: ↑Thu Mar 30, 2023 6:30 pmLock her up! Lock her up!randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Mar 30, 2023 6:13 pm Its bad news. Not for Trump supporters. But for the country in general. Legally targeting political opponents is a horrible precedent to set
So politicians who break the law - you think nothing should happen to them?
Defense. Rebounds.
Re: Charges
Trump must be at peace having been indicted by a grand jury he thinks so much of:
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Frank Wilhoit
Frank Wilhoit
Re: Charges
I wonder if he will get to maintain his hair in prison?