jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 25, 2023 3:32 pm
KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Apr 25, 2023 2:10 pm
https://www.wfla.com/technology-en/a-13 ... op-it/amp/
Heather and Ken McConney, the boy’s parents, told NBC News that they believe the kidnapping was preventable. It came after a series of missed opportunities over the span of nearly a month, where, they said, Twitter and law enforcement failed to effectively intervene despite an abundance of information posted online. They’re demanding answers.
nah…free speech, man
Social media platform liability (on things like this) is an extremely nuanced subject. I'm not sure there are "right" answers.
I definitely DO know that one of the key reasons social media companies would NOT want to be considered quasi-public "places" is that they do NOT want liability for what happens to members of the public who "gather" there.
i’m sure that even under the best circumstances of monitoring and protection, that some things would fall through the cracks…it’s inevitable
in this particular situation it seems like twitter dragged its feet throughout, even after the correct handle was provided (layton pd seems to have screwed the pooch here)
twitter users finding and flagging the account before twitter itself does, after musk claims that combatting these kinds of things was priority #1, is what i find so problematic
but for me this also ties into the larger issue of access to social media platforms by minors, the risks involved and the potential damage that can be done (be it directly from other users, or from a more general mental health/personal image perspective)
imo, no 12 year old NEEDS a cell phone. but, i’m not a parent
(i didn’t get my first cell until age 19)