I guess the sugar daddy explanation is legit enough.
So then the issue becomes, just how representative to a democracy politicians with billionaire spouses can really be.
Also…
I guess the sugar daddy explanation is legit enough.
so, by that logic, marrying into wealth should disqualify someone from holding office?ousdahl wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 1:58 pmI guess the sugar daddy explanation is legit enough.
So then the issue becomes, just how representative to a democracy politicians with billionaire spouses can really be.
Also…
The notion that politicians are supposed to "represent their constituents" as an actual "they're like me" is ridiculous. The current GOP is trying that path and it has resulted in a bunch of incompetent morons being put into Congress.ousdahl wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 1:58 pmI guess the sugar daddy explanation is legit enough.
So then the issue becomes, just how representative to a democracy politicians with billionaire spouses can really be.
Also…
A bailout or not? Did the federal government bailout Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank?
You tell him, I'm not going to.
Can we bring back Celebrity Deathmatch just for a one time claymation battle between her and Kari Lake, for the veep spot on Trump 2024’s ticket?Feral wrote: ↑Thu May 18, 2023 9:21 am Although the Libs are trying to create the impression that republicans have no policy ideas or programs to offer other than more tax cuts for the rich while suppressing women's rights and advancing a nation-wide effort to suppress the votes of minorities and people unlikely to vote for them, i.e., no effort to engage in issues the majority of the American electorate cares about, this should put the lie to that slanderous meme, instantaneously: