my brother in Christ, then what do we even have to bicker about here?KUTradition wrote: ↑Wed May 31, 2023 9:02 am and just so we’re clear, i’m not happy with the way the western allies have handled their support
aren't sanctions often criticized on a number of levels, tho? They may negatively affect the lives of ordinary people, more so than they negatively affect the adversarial state's war efforts. And, I don't have the article in front of me right now, but I swear I saw headlines like, "European sanctions on Russian oil means not that Europe is no longer buying Russian oil, but more that Europe is buying Russian oil but now at a markup after it's funneled through places like India instead. Or was it Saudi Arabia? Or both? Or was that just more Russian propaganda? I'll have to google that one.
i’m personally of the opinion that all sanctions possible should’ve come down like a hammer from the get-go. i don’t know how feasible that would’ve been, but that’s my feeling
talk dirty to Qusdahl!
and, as i’ve said before both here and in other threads, i’m not comfortable with our level of military spending to the detriment of other priorities (namely, environment, healthcare, and education).
oh, so I guess you DON'T like the idea of China or Russia trying to militarily corner us on some global level?
at the same time, though, the US getting out of the MIC business would leave a vacuum, with no guarantees on who would fill it. i prefer the world order with the US on top, rather than run the risk of it being china or russia
cuz apparently they don't like the idea of us doing it to them, either...not that the US possesses the collective awareness to realize that.
and, I don't mean that as trying to be some apologist for Russia, nor China!
But, now I'm really wondering about this vacuum you speak of.