2024

[KUTradition]

jfc

[Shirley]

Verified = cast by a white person

If it must be verified, then it can be easily thrown out. Like in Texas.

It's a mechanism by which they can claim to not count votes they don't want to count.

How do you verify a secret ballot?

Every "legal" vote

You’ll have to forgive us for not being okay with having another election stolen.

[Mjl]

Stolen? Do explain

[TDub]

Verified = cast by a white person

If it must be verified, then it can be easily thrown out. Like in Texas.

It's a mechanism by which they can claim to not count votes they don't want to count.

How do you verify a secret ballot?

Every "legal" vote

You’ll have to forgive us for not being okay with having another election stolen.

youre such a damn pussy. definition of the modern republican.

Its like you all are trying to outdo each other.

One side is crying and whining over every little thing....used the wrong pronoun, everyone is racist if they don't agree with me. We don't want to work...its too hard.

the other side complains and whines about every damn thing in life from the comfort of their AC. This shithead we put all our efforts into didnt win.....it was stolen! These guys don't like us woe as me. Well show them...we'll ship innocent immigrants across the country to show how serious we are. Covid was a farce..Im not wearing your fucking mask.....instead I will restrict the reproductive rights of half the nation.


Such. A. Fucking. Joke.

Get it together America. This is absolutely embarrassing. All of it.

[twocoach]

Verified = cast by a white person

If it must be verified, then it can be easily thrown out. Like in Texas.

It's a mechanism by which they can claim to not count votes they don't want to count.

How do you verify a secret ballot?

Every "legal" vote

You’ll have to forgive us for not being okay with having another election stolen.

I don't know if this is funny or sad. I don't know if I should just blow off everything you say at this point because you are clearly basing your reality on nonsense that confirms your desired outcome or if I should keep an eye on everything you say because it's a window into all the kooks out there. It's clear you have chosen to simply live in an alternate reality where there are no facts that can enter if they do not meet your acceptance criteria.

[JKLivin]

Verified = cast by a white person

If it must be verified, then it can be easily thrown out. Like in Texas.

It's a mechanism by which they can claim to not count votes they don't want to count.

How do you verify a secret ballot?

Every "legal" vote

You’ll have to forgive us for not being okay with having another election stolen.

youre such a damn pussy. definition of the modern republican.

Its like you all are trying to outdo each other.

One side is crying and whining over every little thing....used the wrong pronoun, everyone is racist if they don't agree with me. We don't want to work...its too hard.

the other side complains and whines about every damn thing in life from the comfort of their AC. This shithead we put all our efforts into didnt win.....it was stolen! These guys don't like us woe as me. Well show them...we'll ship innocent immigrants across the country to show how serious we are. Covid was a farce..Im not wearing your fucking mask.....instead I will restrict the reproductive rights of half the nation.


Such. A. Fucking. Joke.

Get it together America. This is absolutely embarrassing. All of it.

I annoy you to no end, yet you feel compelled to read and respond to all of my posts. Talk about embarrassing.

[JKLivin]

Verified = cast by a white person

If it must be verified, then it can be easily thrown out. Like in Texas.

It's a mechanism by which they can claim to not count votes they don't want to count.

How do you verify a secret ballot?

Every "legal" vote

You’ll have to forgive us for not being okay with having another election stolen.

I don't know if this is funny or sad. I don't know if I should just blow off everything you say at this point because you are clearly basing your reality on nonsense that confirms your desired outcome or if I should keep an eye on everything you say because it's a window into all the kooks out there. It's clear you have chosen to simply live in an alternate reality where there are no facts that can enter if they do not meet your acceptance criteria.

Yup, that’s definitely it. You’re right and we’re wrong. Thanks for talking some sense into me.

[jfish26]

Underlying story (free to read per the link) is a named-source, closely-reported one about Trump’s plans to dramatically increase executive power should he win reelection.

[twocoach]

You’ll have to forgive us for not being okay with having another election stolen.

I don't know if this is funny or sad. I don't know if I should just blow off everything you say at this point because you are clearly basing your reality on nonsense that confirms your desired outcome or if I should keep an eye on everything you say because it's a window into all the kooks out there. It's clear you have chosen to simply live in an alternate reality where there are no facts that can enter if they do not meet your acceptance criteria.

Yup, that’s definitely it. You’re right and we’re wrong. Thanks for talking some sense into me.

There is zero evidence to support the notion that the election results were stolen. None. You have provided no evidence to prove that any sort of activity happened that changed who won.

Countless amounts of evidence has been provided to the contrary however. Votes have been hand counted in states in questioned and audited by numerous officials. There is simply nothing to support your claim.

[jfish26]

I don't know if this is funny or sad. I don't know if I should just blow off everything you say at this point because you are clearly basing your reality on nonsense that confirms your desired outcome or if I should keep an eye on everything you say because it's a window into all the kooks out there. It's clear you have chosen to simply live in an alternate reality where there are no facts that can enter if they do not meet your acceptance criteria.

Yup, that’s definitely it. You’re right and we’re wrong. Thanks for talking some sense into me.

There is zero evidence to support the notion that the election results were stolen. None. You have provided no evidence to prove that any sort of activity happened that changed who won.

Countless amounts of evidence has been provided to the contrary however. Votes have been hand counted in states in questioned and audited by numerous officials. There is simply nothing to support your claim.

There is lots of room for reasonable disagreement on all sorts of policy matters.

There is not room for reasonable disagreement on the reliability of the 2020 election results.

[KUTradition]

c’mon, guys…psych’s opinion is every bit as good as objective facts

[DCHawk1]

Underlying story (free to read per the link) is a named-source, closely-reported one about Trump’s plans to dramatically increase executive power should he win reelection.

Gross.

[KUTradition]

nah, he’s really a good guy

[JKLivin]

I don't know if this is funny or sad. I don't know if I should just blow off everything you say at this point because you are clearly basing your reality on nonsense that confirms your desired outcome or if I should keep an eye on everything you say because it's a window into all the kooks out there. It's clear you have chosen to simply live in an alternate reality where there are no facts that can enter if they do not meet your acceptance criteria.

Yup, that’s definitely it. You’re right and we’re wrong. Thanks for talking some sense into me.

There is zero evidence to support the notion that the election results were stolen. None. You have provided no evidence to prove that any sort of activity happened that changed who won.

Countless amounts of evidence has been provided to the contrary however. Votes have been hand counted in states in questioned and audited by numerous officials. There is simply nothing to support your claim.

I can provide evidence, but be honest - you're not going to accept it. You and the rest of the liberal hivemind have set up an impossible standard: prove that the election was stolen, but you can only use sources that are aligned with and are a tool of the entities that stole the election. Not gonna happen. But you not only know that, you're perfectly happy with it.

[KUTradition]

just stop

aside from dumb, you’re looking sillier with every post

republican-appointed judges (at least 38), among others, have determined the election results were correct

(more than 60 judges in total have rebuked stolen election claims)

[KUTradition]

i could provide evidence…

clown

[twocoach]

Yup, that’s definitely it. You’re right and we’re wrong. Thanks for talking some sense into me.

There is zero evidence to support the notion that the election results were stolen. None. You have provided no evidence to prove that any sort of activity happened that changed who won.

Countless amounts of evidence has been provided to the contrary however. Votes have been hand counted in states in questioned and audited by numerous officials. There is simply nothing to support your claim.

I can provide evidence, but be honest - you're not going to accept it. You and the rest of the liberal hivemind have set up an impossible standard: prove that the election was stolen, but you can only use sources that are aligned with and are a tool of the entities that stole the election. Not gonna happen. But you not only know that, you're perfectly happy with it.

I would be happy to at least consider your evidence if you provide it. Try me.

[jfish26]

There is zero evidence to support the notion that the election results were stolen. None. You have provided no evidence to prove that any sort of activity happened that changed who won.

Countless amounts of evidence has been provided to the contrary however. Votes have been hand counted in states in questioned and audited by numerous officials. There is simply nothing to support your claim.

I can provide evidence, but be honest - you're not going to accept it. You and the rest of the liberal hivemind have set up an impossible standard: prove that the election was stolen, but you can only use sources that are aligned with and are a tool of the entities that stole the election. Not gonna happen. But you not only know that, you're perfectly happy with it.

I would be happy to at least consider your evidence if you provide it. Try me.

Any reasonable person would always be willing to consider new evidence.

But I'd have to imagine that the parties who would benefit from that evidence being real would be using that evidence to their benefit.

Good evidence wouldn't be used to sow doubt and misinformation online in service of a long-con goal; it would be used to win in (favorable!) courts.

But when you can't get (favorable!) courts to back you, your evidence probably stinks!

[twocoach]

Underlying story (free to read per the link) is a named-source, closely-reported one about Trump’s plans to dramatically increase executive power should he win reelection.

So much for "smaller government".

[jfish26]

Underlying story (free to read per the link) is a named-source, closely-reported one about Trump’s plans to dramatically increase executive power should he win reelection.

So much for "smaller government".

Well it is smaller. Which is sort of the problem! The whole play would be to consolidate power in fewer (and less accountable) places. Autocracy in increasingly-tattered "conservative" clothes.