Vivek ramaswamy

[RainbowsandUnicorns]

Lulz.

Tweet was deleted.
An example of "Censorship" on the platform the guy you have undying admiration for owns?

[zsn]

[randylahey]

[randylahey]

The tweet is still up

[jfish26]

Neat?

Vivek sure seems to be trying to corner the internet sleuth market.

[defixione]

Is there anything Vivek isn't an authority on?

[jfish26]

[KUTradition]

the aliens provided the Jews with the space lasers being used to spark all the forest fires

the evidence is all over the place if you’re intellectually honest and haven’t given into the fake news and liberal media

[RainbowsandUnicorns]

The tweet is still up

Help me out here.
Maybe I am misunderstanding and/or overthinking this and I am an idiot?
Maybe you're an idiot?
Maybe both?
Maybe neither?
You tell me.

You say "the tweet is still up".

You posted his tweet ON HERE at 6:23am.

This is what I see when I click on the tweet you provided.



Then at 12:09 you shared a post of something he tweeted at 6:36am.
Followed at 12:10 pm with your post stating "the tweets is still up".

In other words, I am asking why you are claiming something he tweeted before 6:23am that is "still up" - has a time of 6:36am on the tweet? Hmmmm.

[randylahey]

The tweet is still up

Help me out here.
Maybe I am misunderstanding and/or overthinking this and I am an idiot?
Maybe you're an idiot?
Maybe both?
Maybe neither?
You tell me.

You say "the tweet is still up".

You posted his tweet ON HERE at 6:23am.

This is what I see when I click on the tweet you provided.



Then at 12:09 you shared a post of something he tweeted at 6:36am.
Followed at 12:10 pm with your post stating "the tweets is still up".

In other words, I am asking why you are claiming something he tweeted before 6:23am that is "still up" - has a time of 6:36am on the tweet? Hmmmm.

Not calling you out specifically, but this conversation is pointless bickering. A lot of you on here do this, pointless bickering. With no substance

So vivek probably did some minor editing of the original tweet, deleted and reuploaded it. So what? Who cares

Same message is still up. Original link isn't. Moot point

[Sparko]

Pointless bickerer would be someone who cut and pasted a pointless tweet by a rightwing nut

[Overlander]

Pointless bickerer would be someone who cut and pasted a pointless tweet by a rightwing nut

“Pointless Bickerer” should be on Randy’s tombstone

[RainbowsandUnicorns]

The tweet is still up

Help me out here.
Maybe I am misunderstanding and/or overthinking this and I am an idiot?
Maybe you're an idiot?
Maybe both?
Maybe neither?
You tell me.

You say "the tweet is still up".

You posted his tweet ON HERE at 6:23am.

This is what I see when I click on the tweet you provided.



Then at 12:09 you shared a post of something he tweeted at 6:36am.
Followed at 12:10 pm with your post stating "the tweets is still up".

In other words, I am asking why you are claiming something he tweeted before 6:23am that is "still up" - has a time of 6:36am on the tweet? Hmmmm.

Not calling you out specifically, but this conversation is pointless bickering. A lot of you on here do this, pointless bickering. With no substance

So vivek probably did some minor editing of the original tweet, deleted and reuploaded it. So what? Who cares

Same message is still up. Original link isn't. Moot point

"Pointless bickering with no substance"? From me? Maybe "pointless" to you but it's not "pointless" to me when you (and anyone else, and I myself) make a mistake. What more substance do you need?

Remember, in regards to something being "pointless with no substance", it's YOU who continues to post tweets and Instagram posts without adding any of your own input regarding the tweet and Instagram post. Much of it without your doing any research into what has been tweeted or posted on Instagram nor knowing who the heck the person is who tweeted and/or posted it - and if they have any legitimacy and integrity.

Yes Vivek, in the following order, very well may have deleted, edited, then "reuploaded" his tweet.
You're asking "who cares"? Obviously I care and YOU must care as well. You felt the need to share his tweet and then respond to my post on here. Right? Forgive me, YOU may not care but I'm curious as to why he or someone else felt the need to delete his original tweet, what he may have edited, and why.

"Moot point" to YOU. Sorry, not a "moot point" to me when you continuously choose to inundate us with your tweets and Instagram stuff and then make posts that are mistakes (tiny, medium size, or huge) that you pass off as being factual on here.
Perhaps unlike you, my hope is people call me out and correct me when I make mistakes.


Moving on..... Did you watch any of the hearing/s? I watched a little bit of it live. I found it pretty interesting.

[randylahey]

Pointless bickerer would be someone who cut and pasted a pointless tweet by a rightwing nut

Vivek, someone running for office because he wants his country to remain free and prosperous

Aka a right-wing nutjob. Geez you guys are lost

[jfish26]

Pointless bickerer would be someone who cut and pasted a pointless tweet by a rightwing nut

Vivek, someone running for office because he wants his country to remain free and prosperous

Aka a right-wing nutjob. Geez you guys are lost

As usual you misidentify the point.

Maybe Vivek is actually running for those reasons. Or maybe not.

But his nutjobness comes from the HOW. The WHY is irrelevant.

[KUTradition]

https://nytimes.com/2023/05/05/us/polit ... swamy.html

sounds like ramalamadingdong has about the same level of constitutional understanding that randy does

that is to say: not much

[KUTradition]

and he’s a rapper to boot!!!

[RainbowsandUnicorns]

Pointless bickerer would be someone who cut and pasted a pointless tweet by a rightwing nut

Vivek, someone running for office because he wants his country to remain free and prosperous

Aka a right-wing nutjob. Geez you guys are lost

Yes, right-wing nutjob.

He's running for "office" for a lot more reasons than he wants his country to remain free and prosperous - as vivek2024.com attests to.

Not that he ever had it but he definitely lost my vote when I noticed the very first thing he claims on his campaign website under "TRUTH." is.....

1. God is real.

Maybe. Maybe not. I challenge him to prove HIS truth.

[twocoach]

Pointless bickerer would be someone who cut and pasted a pointless tweet by a rightwing nut

Vivek, someone running for office because he wants his country to remain free and prosperous

Aka a right-wing nutjob. Geez you guys are lost

It's his methods, not his reasoning, that make him a right-wing nut job.

[twocoach]

Pointless bickerer would be someone who cut and pasted a pointless tweet by a rightwing nut

Vivek, someone running for office because he wants his country to remain free and prosperous

Aka a right-wing nutjob. Geez you guys are lost

Yes, right-wing nutjob.

He's running for "office" for a lot more reasons than he wants his country to remain free and prosperous - as vivek2024.com attests to.

Not that he ever had it but he definitely lost my vote when I noticed the very first thing he claims on his campaign website under "TRUTH." is.....

1. God is real.

Maybe. Maybe not. I challenge him to prove HIS truth.

His list is just right-wing buzzword bingo and is all either debatable or just flat out corny.

"Parents determine the education of their children." is one of the most ignorant statements that could be made.